• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      yeah.

      If I hear some one use the other term, my plan is to confront them about using “pedo” language. If they insist, I’ll shift to questioning their support for a pedo.

      There is a cognitive dissonance that’s been set up where their love and obedience to Trump is tied in with an alleged “hate” of ‘pedos’. I mean it’s obviously bullshit but you can skewer someone who can’t disambiguate the two using this approach and create a situation in their mind they can’t handle.

  • Heikki2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    People, we can not waste time focusing on the fact that President of the United States, Donald Trump, was best friends with the world’s most notorious pedophile, Jeffery Epstiens, for 15 plus year and is currently trying to cover up the fact that he was most sertently a client if one looks at even the most broad meaning of “wonderful secrets”.

    We must focus on the more important things like… checks notes

    Bringing back real sugar in Coke

    The auto pen “scandal”

    Hillary Clinton’s Emails despite Trum admins actually sharing OPSEC details with a reporter

    You know the important stuff of the things that really matter to the people

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 days ago

    Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen.

    Seems to me they’re more into Cricket, but what do I know?

    … oh, he means the other Indians. Huh.

    • atticus88th@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m still confused because it seemed like a few years ago they wanted to be called Indians but for years everyone was being corrected to call them Native Americans. Can I just call them by their tribe name or is this an insult now too?

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not too confusing. Call a person by what they want to be called. I think it’s more respectful to call them native Americans.

        I’d also say in this case the brand name Indians, Chiefs, and any other should be handed over to the tribes, and then licensed out however they see fit.

        I also think they should have 2 senators, a US rep and an electoral college vote.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Ah, but generic names like “Indians” and “Chiefs” dont really belong to one tribe, do they? We do have teams that are named after tribes specifically, like the Blackhawks. (Although Wikipedia says the team was named after an army regiment, which was named after the tribe.) And if you get into college sports, you have a lot more.

          People may find those less objectionable because there is a tribe or a group of people who the team can say they represent, and get some culturally appropriate context to the team name. But calling a team “Indians” seems analogous to calling a team the “Asians” or the “Europeans”.

          The systemic oppression of the native population also has something to do with it. Nobody complains about the Padres and their Friar logo, or the handsomely Nordic logo for the Vikings. But that could be because they didn’t get treated the same way.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            While I agree that there are details that would need to be worked out, it’s not as impossible as you’re making it sound.

            I’m sure the existing tribes have some form of leadership. Put them in a room together and have them work it out.

            I disagree that others groups need to be addressed at the same time. Let’s focus on fixing one issue on its own instead of trying to fix every issue at once. That’s scope creep, and it’s never a good thing.

            Lastly, your example of teams being named “Asians” or “Europeans” is not the same, else we would have those names.

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        My understanding is Native is generally fine, many have reclaimed “Indian” for themselves but results may vary. If you do know a person’s affiliation then that’s obviously fine too.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      That article doesn’t say what you think it says. The family of the man pictured in the logo wanted to keep it because it was it of the most widely seen images of a Native American. The family themselves don’t seem to care about the name much. Other groups do though.

      I was never a big fan about the wholesale elimination of native-inspired team names, because I always felt the iconography was more offensive. There could have been tasteful ways for Cleveland to keep the “Indians” name, but it was clear years ago that Chief Wahoo had to go. Same for Chief Nokahoma (who I think the Braves retired in rhe 80s), and every team with a Tomohawk in their logo.

      The Redskins were always a different case. The logo wasn’t quite so offensive, but try naming a team the Spics, Honkeys, or Japs and see how people like that. The name had to go. They could have named the team after the Blackfeet tribe, somehow, and kept the logo. But once they abandoned native names, the logo had to go.

      It’s too bad the Washington Generals was already taken, that would have been awesome. In retrospect, they should have kept Washington Football Team…

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Everyone would actually remember they are from D.C. and not the state of Washington if you called them that.

      Edit for fun fact: Washington D.C. is more than 300km closer to the equator, than it is to the capital of Washington.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Child rapist grasps for distraction from his role in a sex trafficking ring.

  • kinsnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    i’ll have to agree they need to return to their old name. Washington Football Team was great, they should return to that

  • Wazowski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why didn’t he command them to rename themselves to “Donald trump definitely didn’t rape kids?”

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    He probably wants to force them to sell the team back to Dan Snyder, too. Trump and Snyder do seem to be men cut from the same cloth.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Snyder only sexually harassed adult cheerleaders, though, so he’s not quite in Tump’s league