Isn’t it a reference to making moonshine? That’s how I grew up understanding it.

Again…twisting someone’s words into something completely different than what was said to make whatever point you feel you need to make. Unserious.

All I asked was for clarification about HOW you imagine this mechanism of withholding votes in the numbers you’re talking about. It’s math, not attacking your social standing or worth.

Go and read about people who made serious inroads for their social causes like Harvey Milk or Barbara Gittings. That’s how you get to real social change. Hell, look at Sarah McBride. She sees the social systems for what they are, and is working inside them to affect the changes she wants to happen. Doing this argumentative bluster thing that you’re doing and just attacking people, or threatening to abstain from the existing voting system is going to do shit. That’s just the reality of it.

You seem to think I’m complaining about something, when my words obviously don’t do anything of the sort. You’re doing this “Royal We” and acting like you’re the representative for a larger group of people, which your are not. I’m simply pointing out the flaws in your statements and trying to understand what you’re trying to to say. As others have said, you’re not making a lot of sense.

First: I’m not “complaining about trans people” in any way. I’m pointing out the flaw in your logic, and attempting to understand what mechanism you believe you are attempting to enact here because it’s no making sense.

Second: trying to contort other people’s comments to turn yourself into a victim over falsehoods is the weakest of weak discourse, and makes you seem like an unserious person. I hope you don’t engage with people in person like that, because it’s a fast track to being ignored.

Hol’up…

Where did you get the idea that “trans people are numerous enough”? Numerous in what, exactly? To swing an election?

I’m so confused by all the stuff you’re posting around here. It seems you are VERY misinformed about your position in society as a member of a group, and how that affects US elections at large.

I’m not saying to hold back on your swings or anything, but the crazy vitriol you’re spouting off just seems to say you’re making some wild assumptions that will not play out…

Look…just going to be super honest here and say a Super Minority group of maybe 1-2% making electoral threats doesn’t math out, and in the bigger picture of things happening right now only amounts to extortion, and the Gay Community at large can explain to you why this doesn’t work in great detail.

The words you posted don’t even match the tenor of the article you’ve linked, so I’m feeling this is just a misguided way of putting some bluster out there. At best, you need to side with the people trying to protect you, but in the realm of all logic you’ve apparently decided to make a threat towards them if you don’t get exactly all the things you want on your checklist.

It’s like yelling “You better give me the money, or I’m going to rob this bank here” to the cops, but you’re standing in a Wendy’s parking lot, and you have no weapons.

Iceland 100%

Lol. Better do it in the next week, buddy.

Not when it’s pointing out another failure by Zuckyboy

This kinda sounds like the last GRDS hack maybe? Would need some proof to even say if this is new.

Lots of videos out there on this specific thing for some reason. Maybe Tablescaping is more popular than I thought?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31niB9ovETs

The easiest tell is the creators thinking anyone even knew who Eg Begkey Jr was anymore,.let alone cares what he thinks.

Literally what we are saying. I don’t think we are understanding what you’re trying to reinforce.

I’m not sure if you mean “trust” as in a handshake or not, but that’s not what we’re talking about about. At larger scales, everything is done in written contracts, strictly. Shit rolls DOWNhill if those are not airtight, and that’s when lawsuits kick off.

Not true. I’ve been involved in litigation with both AWS and Google over unsecured comms that were defined as being TLS secured in SLA/SLO contracts and found not to be. Not that anything nefarious was happening necessarily, but the expectation is clear.

Whether these asshats even check for such requirements with a Musk run company right now 🤷

It COULD possibly be that they are logging every exchange happening at the network fabric between the service layers, but nobody knows unless they intentionally take steps to investigate or accidentally prove it.

See here

Then if you want to lock that specific version, go to /etc/pacman.conf and add the base package name to the ignore list so it doesn’t just go and get updated on the next upgrade run.

Generally no, because most hosting companies would have something baked into SLA/SLO contracts, but all of this shit is done so illegally and shadily now, I wouldn’t put a hard “no” on that possibility.

Progressive? Just flipping through this stuff, she’s obviously not a Progressive. Anarchist, maybe. Never heard of her. Can’t say anything she’s writing about is landing whatsoever with me, so probably why. Lots of complaining and zero constructive ideas.

I’m not downvoting the general sentiment of the title here, just the content.

This is AWFUL writing. A lot of circular reasoning with no real points landed on the topic at hand, and ZERO exposition in expressing that idea whatsoever.

I looked up the “author”, and they’ve only been posting content for a few weeks, which leads me to believe this is a spam post. Only her “husband” posts content or appears in camera, which makes me think this is a fake account altogether.

How would this have been organically found when this writer is relatively unknown according to hits and traffic?

Also handy heard anything like that. Supporting info appreciated.