• Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Certainly it looks like your trying to post a meme on Lemmy 👍🔥 Do you need help with that? Here’s my top memes brought to you by Raid Of Warfare get the new frog togs skin only $4.99.

    Would you like to open this in edge? 💪🤔

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Would you like to open this in edge? 💪🤔

      I spent time over the holidays setting up edge on a relative’s laptop.

      One where I could’t enable the play store.

      Long story short, he has to run two bash scripts and can use it through a VM with debian 12 with KDE, because I tried to install wine on there last year.

  • Hond@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I remember how the startmenu didnt suck on windows 7 and just worked. Good times. That was also the last time where you could find most of the options in one place.

    Like in 2015 i was weirded out how a multibillion dollar company wasnt able to just make a new app for settings with feature parity to the old thing for their major new OS release. 10 years later: lmao.

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 days ago

    Unrelated to that exact image but I’m gonna rant about other windows shit because I feel like it.

    Windows decided my page file needed to be 80 GB. I do not want it to be 90 GB. I go to the start menu and search up “page file” to see if there’s a settings menu. First result is a random file in an application’s directory that can’t be opened/displayed by any program on my PC, then a list of other unrelated files.

    So I open Control Panel, hoping to find it where I did before, and I click on System. What do you know, that menu no longer exists, and redirects to Windows Settings. Where do I go from here? Maybe the giant Installed RAM section because the page file is just a (overly simplified) method of extending your memory to your disk? No, of course not, that menu’s not actually a menu, it’s just a stat counter.

    Instead, I have to go to Device Specifications, then the section titled Related links, then click Advanced system settings. Oh whaddaya know? Now I’m in the settings menu that used to be behind the original System option in Control Panel!

    Now I’m in the Advanced tab of that menu. But where do I go from here? That’s right, Performance Options, and then another Advanced tab!!!

    Then I have to click the Change button, where Windows has… conveniently enabled System managed size so it could choose to set my page file to 80 GB.

    I edit, it, hit Ok, have to hit Apply in the other menu too, have to close out the no-longer-needed Settings and Control Panel windows that only served as a maze to get me here in the first place, and THEN I can restart my computer to reduce the size of the page file, even though it is currently not in use by any program, and all data is in RAM, and the file could reasonably be shrunk by the system at any time.

    After the restart, this process begins all over again, because this is my third attempt, and Windows automatically reverts back to managing the size itself, and sets it to 80 GB. I have 5 GB of storage space left on my disk.

    • toddestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      As I say, when you’re hunting around for something in Windows and you come across a dialog box that came straight from Windows XP… you’re getting close.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      I empathize with this slightly non-ideal situation.

      But can you imagine how insane it would be if you were told to do something like copy/paste swapoff /swap && truncate -s 8G /swap && swapon /swap into a terminal? TEXT? Like a caveman? The horror! The heresy! How can anyone be expected to do something so complicated! This is entirely unreasonable UX and the reason why Linux is straight up unusable.

      Btw here’s 15 bazillion commands in a .ps to perhaps disable some of the ads in your start menu until the next time your computer reboots.

      • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        I agree with the sentiment, and it would definitely make a lot of troubleshooting easier, but you do gotta remember that 99% of people are so non-technical they won’t read anything going into their terminal, or if they do, they won’t know what it means.

        You could just as easily replace that with sudo rm -rf /* and they’d run it just as quickly, and that’s my worry.

        IMO we should just have settings menus alongside commands for most things any normal user might have to encounter, since that’s just a more user-friendly interface in terms of preventing accidental bad command execution and also just letting people find things on their own without having to look up a command every time if they don’t want to learn a short book’s worth of terminal commands.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The kind of person who blindly runs commands also blindly runs any .exe or .bat they download from github which is not any better.

          Of course in an ideal world there’d be a perfect GUI for everything, and we’ve gotten a lot better at that in the last few years. But it’s not like windows is lacking in things that are only configurable through CLI or the registry (which is even more opaque). I’m not saying Linux is perfect, just pointing out the hypocrisy.

          • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            While true, copying and pasting is much easier to exploit, especially since websites can alter your clipboard. Not to mention that people are already more wary of downloadable executables, but less so for commands.

            For example, I’m not sure if you saw the newer attack vector a lot of scammers are using, but essentially they’ll have a 3-step process saying “Press Win + R” and “Press Ctrl + V” then “Hit Enter”, as a fake captcha, and the site automatically copies a malicious command to their clipboard, which then gets run when they paste.

            A similar attack vector could take place where a user copies a command that looks legitimate, hits paste and enter, and only then is it clear that the site copied a new command to their clipboard that isn’t the one on the site they thought they checked.

            I do agree that Windows is still pretty shit in this regard though. I just think we should seek to not emulate that as a requirement for users to edit certain settings if we can help it :)

            • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              The attack vector of convincing users to do stuff exists regardless of whether a niche GUI exists somewhere to do <the thing>. The only proper defense against social engineering is a) training and b) following the least privilege principle (which neither Windows or traditional Linux desktop’s permission model properly, as the current user in either case has full permissions to retrieve extremely sensitive credentials such as browser cookies without interaction).

              xkcd 1200

              Trying to defend against this from the perspective of de-normalizing the CLI is like defending against drunk driving by adding a bittering agent to Guiness beer exclusively.

              As for clipboard highjacking, I am well aware, which is why any decent modern terminal emulator should a) strip escape codes by default and b) support bracketed-paste, to prevent immediate execution of a pasted command. If yours does not, please consider switching to a safer alternative (such as kitty).

        • kazerniel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          IMO we should just have settings menus alongside commands for most things any normal user might have to encounter, since that’s just a more user-friendly interface in terms of preventing accidental bad command execution and also just letting people find things on their own without having to look up a command every time if they don’t want to learn a short book’s worth of terminal commands.

          THIS. As a lifelong Windows user I’d rather deal with layers of shitty GUI, than having to memorise terminal commands and always pay attention not to mistype them lest I fuck my system up.

          I can’t switch to Linux yet due to lack of support from my essential programs, but even if it wasn’t for those, I’d still be annoyed if I had to use a terminal to change settings in my system.

    • bequirtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Had to go through this the other day. At the third consecutive “advanced settings” menu I wondered if this was some kind of sick joke

    • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      All this yes. If you’re actually looking for help, you have to also click “set” after changing the page file settings.

      • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes?

        If my page file is set to 80 GB by default but isn’t being used by applications because my actual RAM utilization is always under 80%, and they have a dedicated settings menu for it, you’d think they could make getting to that settings menu not take a minimum of 8 separate clicks (assuming you have memorized exactly where to go from the start, and never click the wrong button or link), 4 separate menus, 2 nested “Advanced” menus, and multiple fields and checkboxes to tick off and edit after all of that, just to say “Use less of my disk for the page file”. This could literally be a slider in Settings.

        The page file doesn’t cause major system instability if you adjust its size, unless you’re constantly using much more RAM than your system has, and the page file is manually set extremely small.

        It just helps keep your system more stable by offloading excess data that can’t be stored in RAM to your disk. My entire computer, even under heavy load, never needs more then 2-5 GB of space on top of my RAM, and that’s when I’m running games at max settings, my browser with 40 tabs open, and multiple instances of 3D design software in the background, hardly a common enough occurrence for Windows to justify going “eh, maybe they’ll actually need 80 GB, you never know”, and never letting me change it even after I restart.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Swap is also used to offload data in RAM that’s used infrequently to instead prioritise caching data that doesn’t need to be in RAM but is nevertheless used more frequently.

          If you’re playing Dark Souls and have a web browser open in the background, each time you die the game may need to re-load some level data or assets from disk (e.g. they relate to the area you respawn in, but not where you keep dying). If the computer can instead keep those in RAM, you can respawn faster. If it has to put Chrome on disk that may be a worthwhile tradeoff.

    • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m not saying that my Linux installation was super easy to set up, but once set up, I’ve had fewer problems than Windows.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        I just installed Linux the other week and it WAS super easy to set up for me. I was really surprised but everything just worked

        • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          The hardest part was getting my Windows-only games to play properly in Linux. Rocket League was relatively easy, but Skyrim was a real pain to get working. But now that Skyrim is working, it strangely feels either the same or slightly better than it does in Windows.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s been my experience too. I’ve been pleasantly surprised by how easy it is to game on Linux. There have been some games where I had some issues, but the same could be said for Windows too. I think the gaming specific aspect is roughly equal between the two operating systems.

        The nice thing about Linux though is that when it does go wrong, I am better equipped with the information and tools to be able to effectively troubleshoot and fix the problem. At least, in theory — I am still learning, so I often find myself wading through logs that I don’t understand, with little progress. It does at least feel more empowering though, to have the abstract option of being able to fix my problem, even if I am not able to grasp that opportunity in practice.

    • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Spotlight isn’t much better, ads creeping in, and in App Store, Apple TV, and tons of popups for apple subscriptions now

      • vane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I have disabled everything except calculator, calendar and settings in results from apps and it’s somehow usable. Can’t disable stupid buttons.

  • Alloi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    as a linux user (so, genetically superior in every way) i do not have this issue. hahaha…ah.

    … sudo app install … a friend?

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      sudo app install … a friend?

      sudo apt install fortune

      just run that once in a while for jokes. feed it into espeak if you want it to talk to you

      EDIT : ‘fortune | tee /dev/tty | espeak’

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    The Windows start menu is completely useless now. I know they pushed using the search to find apps, but I never used it that way except as a last resort.

    I’ve been on Mint for just over a year, now. I’ll never go back.

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I know this is the wrong audience, but you can type cmd into explorer and it will launch a terminal in that directory (I think this works with any command in your path)

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Another option: use windows+r and type the exact name of the executable, the first time, and then it will remember it next time.

      Also, can right click on the start menu and then click terminal

    • pizza_superstar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Indeed. Also, tried this when I saw it and was surprised that, not only did the Terminal app show up first, but I saw no ads in the start menu at all. Turns out the settings I set on my Windows 11 partition back in 2022 are still there, and I just don’t see stuff like this.

      Like yes, I prefer Linux and wish Windows 11 didn’t have so much crap like this, but… It’s so easy to turn most of it off and move on. Changed them once when I set up this machine and haven’t touched them since. Maybe I’m lucky, but I never had an update change back settings, either.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I remember the windows XP days when the operating system was just that, and not a system designed to track the user and extract as much value/money out of them as possible. It was simple enough that even my dad could use it, if I have to get my dad to use his laptop now he can barely even comprehend the start menu, and thus he mostly just sticks to his phone, I for one am moving to Linux soon as I backup all my files and never dealing with this shit again