reupload because i mixed up sigterm and sigkill like a dumb fuck

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    7 days ago

    Reverse meme when it’s time to install the updates.

    Windows in that case is “I MUST REBOOT IMMEDIATELY PREPARE TO LOSE ALL UNSAVED DATA IN 3. 2. 1…”

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      When I switched to win 10, I actually gave them more money to get the pro version for access to the group policy editor so I could control updates and never have to deal with my PC telling me it’s time to restart on its own. Because I was stupid.

      When it came time to switch to Win 11, I did the much more sensible thing and installed Fedora instead. I started with cinnamon and even though I ended up disliking it also, it was still way better than the windows experience.

    • Trail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not quite. I will RESUME FROM THIS FUCKING “MODERN SLEEP” shit, even though you the user want to turn this shit right off, do it without any warning watsoever, close all your fucking windows and good luck if you have lost work or not.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        “Oh, you need to give a presentation in 3 minutes? Too bad. I decided it’s time to update now, and you WILL spend 45 minutes installing updates before the computer will boot.”

  • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    This but deleting a folder:

    • Are you sure you want to delete this
    • Delete too large to fit in garbage bin, so are you really sure
    • Couldn’t delete stuff (for no clear reason)
    • Even as admin file locks were hard blocking without any easy way to unblock

    Meanwhile on Linux with sudo rm -rf, it’s just gone as demanded.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Partially true. The difference is that in Linux, when you delete a file, you’re just removing the directory entry (potentially just one of many entries that point to the same data). The filesystem doesn’t actually remove the data and reclaim space until all open handles are closed and no remaining directory entries point to the data.

      Any running processes that have the file open are able to continue to read and write that data via the handle despite the directory entry being removed, until the handle is closed.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think a file delete just removing an adress and not the actual data is common to all OSes. That’s why to safely erase data from a disk it is recommended to fully overwrite the disk with random data, potentially multiple times.

        • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          If you delete a still opened file on Linux then the file will disappear for all processes which didn’t already open it, all programs that did already open it can still read and write to it and the file on disk will never be overwritten (as in, used for other files) as long as there’s still a process with the file open.

          Simplifying how it works: The file you see is a link to the actual file(inode), when a program opens a file using this link they get a copy of the link. As long as one link/copy of it still exist the file won’t be deleted. When a program closes all its links get cleaned up so on shutdown all files which only have processes referring to them get marked as deleted.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          that’s a different thing. if you delete a file that is still opened by a process, the space will not get freed up until that process also closed the file. until that point the filesystem still keeps track of the file, it is just not present in any directories anymore.

  • Get_Off_My_WLAN@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    I had to update a Windows 11 work laptop after not touching it for nearly a year. I click ‘shut down’ from the start menu and nothing happens. What? Try it again. Nothing again.

    I have to hold down the power button before the screen shows a “slide to shut down” screen now. How did Microslop fuck up the ‘shut down’ so badly.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I love how the design is so bad now we’re missing the days when shutting down the computer required the “Start” button.

    • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      the alt f4 shutdown window present since win95/nt4 tends to work better than the latest slop menu they made

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    also true for boot (not from suspended state), in my experience.

    windows: wait, let me display the windows logo for 10 seconds, then show a spinny circle, then show the lock screen, then when you try to enter your password, it loads your user profile for another 5 minutes before it shows your desktop icons

    linux: click the power button -> 1.5 seconds later i see the lock screen. enter password and it’s just there.

    • punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve found it to be very dependent on the distro and the hardware it’s running on. Back when I was playing around with distros I definitely tried some that felt like you snapped your fingers and had a desktop. But I settled on Fedora and that takes longer to boot for me than Windows. Not that I mind, 30 seconds once a week or so just isn’t important to me.

      • BlueKey@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Are you perhaps on Wifi? I noticed that Fedora is has configured Systemd to wait for online network before continuing starting the login services.

        • punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          No, this is on a wired machine. I have another one on wireless also running Fedora and I’d say that one is slower to boot, however it’s also on a Ryzen 3600 where my main PC is a 5700X so that’s kinda expected anyway.

    • myotheraccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Back when i still had windows as a second boot option, it was soooo annoyingly slow to boot (like 3 minutes or so). I thought it’s because I installed it on a HDD, not SSD (and that was indeed part of the reason). One day when my internet broke though, I realized it was actually super fast to boot suddenly. It just spent half the time downloading stuff from the internet before, during boot. From then on I just pulled the ethernet cable before booting windows. Fucking joke of an operating system

  • eighty@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s tragic the level of immediate relief I feel every time I shutdown on Linux after years on Windows.

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Reboot

    Windows: save all your woooork. What apps you had open? How would I know?

    Linux: it’s all saved in ram, don’t worry. It’ll be like you never rebooted

  • Demdaru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Gonna make Lemmy pissed off, but installed on my machine Nobara, Cachy and Mint at some point. All of them had comparable if not worse boot and shutdown times to Windows 10. xD ( And worse performance in games but that’s due to having old Nvidia GPU xD )

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s not a request, it’s a warning. The machine will be without power soon, and it’s up to the machine whether it wants to prepare for that or not

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I find my system usually has to wait 90 seconds to kill KDE plasma when I use it without a login manager and then try to shut down…

  • lbfgs@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I had a systemd bug delay shutdown for 2 mins every time for a very long time on Debian. Never managed to fix it, Fedora did not have the same issue fortunately.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I fought one of those on NixOS for 2 months but on boot two whole minutes.

      I had been poking at it for ages in my spare time, because i can only stand so many reboot tests, and once you were up, it was fine.

      On day work issued us Claude code licenses. Maximum effort, maximum model, claude, my startup -> login it taking forever please go find out what’s going on.

      3 reboots later and some very deep seeded issue with a version conflict in PAM that was pissing wayland/kde off in a way that there wasn’t really any error waiting for a timeout.