

They need more regulating so they can’t be abused by trolls


They need more regulating so they can’t be abused by trolls


It is useful because it’s a protection against AI messing with our futures.
To illustrate the point re: transcriptions:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40326654/
The Unexpected Harms of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Reflections on Four Real-World Cases
Kerstin Denecke et al. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025.
Results: The incidents discussed include: Whisper’s harmful hallucinations; UNOS’s algorithm delaying transplants for black patients; the WHO’s S.A.R.A.H. chatbot providing inaccurate health information; and Character AI’s chatbot promoting disordered eating among teens.


If you buy into the story that “someday they’ll all be using it” you are doing the AI boosters’ job for them. It is not a foregone conclusion, and there is no reason to accept that future.


I can share my experience here.
I initially opted-out. I did not want a LLM in charge of summarizing something as important as a medication consultation. I’ve seen the kinds of errors it makes, the way parts of its training data make their way into your file without you having any knowledge or agency.
My provider then came back to me and said it was an error that the original form said you could opt out. Everyone had to sign it, it was HIPAA, it was nothing to worry about, etc.,
I tried explaining my reasons, but they didn’t care. I said that if they couldn’t budge, I would have to change providers. They gave me 90 days of my prescription. My primary care physician agreed to continue my prescription as long as I needed them to. And not long after, I was able to find another psychiatric provider who did not require an AI release.
Also, my primary care doctor asks if I will allow AI transcription every office visit. I feel bad that by saying no, she has to do more work typing. But I feel that the harms are too great, the risks are too much to say yes. While I have the choice, I want humans to be end-to-end responsible for what words are in my medical file, and not by pressing “yes” to agree with llm output.


They’ve been putting ads in Firefox for so long that’s hardly news. Not saying it is good.
Adblockers though.
Chrome recently killed theirs with Manifest v3.
Brave has always been shady.
I dont want an adblocker controlled by the browser and depend on them including a switch.


The same reason you can say fire truck but not fuck.


They also make an android app


AFAIK Mozilla never shipped an adblocker with preferential treatment carved out for themselves.


I could never get past the grind, but it definitely feels like you’re discarding a lot of adventurers


I loved playing trópico 4 good. Just trying to do the best for my little Sims and never squirreling money away to the swiss bank account.


Wait what point is that


It is hard to understand the graph because it is so hard to read.
If they wanted people to read it they could have made it easier. Us ahdh people have it hard enough as it is.


Remember when Newsweek had journalists employed?
Weird that this feels like it validates my dislike of five nights at freddies
I am also hoping to know


The graph is needlessly confusing. If you wanted to describe the ADHD storytelling process, a clearer graph would be easier to read.


I scanned through the next several minutes after this moment and didn’t hear them address the duplicate Outlooks again. So, I emailed the Artemis II communications team, who is definitely not busy today I’m sure, and asked: Can the astronauts check their email yet?
I’ll update if I hear back.


Then it should have been called ADHD storytelling and illustrating.


This could have been a straight line with the same nodes and edges. Maybe some 90 degree turns to stay in a square image format.
My hardware is old. Has hardware decoding for old formats.