(TikTok screencap)

  • Carmakazi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tell crackheads that there’s 50 pounds of copper and two catalytic converters in these things.

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s one of these in a shopping center around me. I flip it off every time I see it.

    I mean, I deliberately drive near it, stop, roll down my window, put my arm out, and flip it off very intentionally.

    I don’t care if it knows me. I’ve made no secret of my hatred for authoritarianism throughout my life. I’ve gone to more protests than I can count. Besides, if authorities really wanted to do something to me, they’d readily make things up anyway. They don’t need an excuse, so I might as well express myself.

    This shit is dystopian as fuck and every time I see it or it blasts out its message about us being watched, it boils my blood.

    Fuck it all. This is not okay.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      . . .flip it off very intentionally.

      Heehee I’m kinda glad I’m not alone here. I walk my neighborhood and people install those STUPID cameras facing the sidewalk to catch EVERYONE walking by, that whistle at you, or say “you are being recorded!”

      I give it the finger without looking at it basically as a reflex now. I’ve never even flipped someone off in traffic, I’ve been told I have the patience of a saint.

      But surveillance capitalism and stupid paranoid suburbanites satisfying their nosy-neighbor compulsions is definitely a line.

      We’ve got those stupid towers all over the place here too. Construction sites, parking lots.

      Freaking absurd. I’m upset that it’s the best crime deterrent they can come up with, because I suppose skulky fellows lurking around dark parking lots aren’t preferable either.

  • null@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    WARNING CITIZEN! THIS AREA IS UNDER SURVEILLANCE! YOUR FACE HAS BEEN SCANNED AND ADDED TO A DATABASE!

  • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hate it. It’s so annoying. The stores in the area hate it because it pisses people off and they complain to the stores and them the stores are like we hate them as well but the cops put them there.

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      the stores are like we hate them as well but the cops put them there.

      If they’re on a store’s parkinglot, they’re trespassing if they’re there without the store’s consent. That means they can be removed.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Even if they are tenants to a lease, the doctrine of quiet enjoyment would prohibit a landlord from being able to freely agree to having police property sitting on the store’s parking lot if their lease covers the parking lot. It’s kinda like renting a house with a yard: your lease is for the house and the yard surrounding the house. A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant’s permission.

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant’s permission.

            On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

            In practice it happens. Unless the tenant has the resources or there’s a legal advocacy group dedicated to that specific issue, owners tend to be able to do whatever they want so long as they use the argument of ‘protecting my property’.

            The settlement and restitution just ends up something like the owner keeps their stuff there and maybe you get to terminate your lease tomorrow without being forced to pay out the whole eight remaining months of the lease. But that’s anecdotal.

            • Sunflier@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

              Trespass to land is a tort, which means there’s the potential for monetary damages.

          • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Regardless it’s the people working at the store who don’t like it. The owner class loves this shit and hate poor people.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m assuming the higher ups for one of the more corp stores allows them there. The people actually working the stores hate them.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I guess that kinda depends on the business structure. Are they fully owned and operated by the main corporation? Or are they licensees of the store’s name and brand? If it’s the first one, some humdrum middle manager could do what you said. If it’s the later, those surveillance things could be trespassing.

          • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Each store has to take care of a part of the lot, but this is all secondhand info from employees working in the stores. So I’d assume one of the stores is fine with the yapping tower thing on one of their spots, even if the other stores aren’t.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      is this the perfect example where men can finally understand why women chose the bear?

      edit: I’m greatly amused that six cucks disliked this comment.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I like it. “Which do you feel safer around, a cop or a crackhead?” Should upset the wife beaters.

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah we’ve got a bunch of these in our neighborhood. It’s a rundown area but this just makes it worse. I’d love nothing more than to mask up and smash this shit

      • Fluke@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        *Mask up and disassemble that shit for parts on the spot. Make it serve the people, rather than spy on them.

  • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I for one think it’s quite generous of the surveillance state to provide free off-grid solar systems for the taking

  • huppakee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    No worries, a few years of surveillance state and everybody becomes a crackhead one way or the other!

    • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mobile surveillance stations. Typically solar powered with a backup battery, and the inevitably monstrous result of surveillance capitalism.