I wonder if the contents of the files can be called as evidence for the defense.

Remember when people used to laugh at international dictators for making up bullshit kangaroo court cases against their political rivals?

Anyway, how’s those pedo-files coming along?

They probably can’t completely patched in their training, but using a pipeline which reviews the prompt and response for specific malicious attack vectors has proved very successful if adding some latency and processing expense.

You can, however, only run these when you detect a potentially malicious known exploit. If the prompt contains any semantic similarity to grandma telling a story or how would my grandma have done x, for example, you can add the extra pipeline step to mitigate against the attack.

Fuck it and find out

Fuck me have they not patched the grandma exploit yet? I have a book from last year which references that one

I bet you’re wondering how I got here. Funny story actually. It all started…

Ok, here’s the fucking thing. They said it’s a national security risk. Then they said there’s no files. Now they’re voting against releasing no files? Pick a fucking stance jfc…