• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      13 days ago

      yeah this is imperial washing. they setup a colony and left it with an antiquated system of measures, then cheated off their neighbor for a better one.

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yes, since the 60’ in the US the measurements are based on the metric system.

        In 1959 the inch was redefined to be exactly 25.4mm.

        So the US and any other country using the imperial system is just using metric but which weird conversion just to make things harder.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    13 days ago

    This meme wasn’t created to ridicule Americans, it was created to enrage the French, and to a lesser extent the Germans.

  • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    The ironic thing is that the imperial system comes from Britain. It’s just that US decided to keep it.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is offensively incorrect.

    Deer are closer to 1.75 bicycles tall.

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      One Imperial deer is 1.74832 bicycles. If you’re going to use a retarded system, you must also use retarded significant figures.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s 1 3/4 bicycles. Not the weird ass decriminalized number you seem to think it is. We do fractions in daily life not decimals.

        I saw a yearling buck eating grass along the driveway yesterday afternoon that had only one antler. I wondered if he was 1/2 a buck or a .50 buck since he had just the one spindly fork horn antler. Will all the does think he’s ugly and not breed with him? Will the other bucks laugh at him and refuse his challenges? He will probably end up in someone’s freezer later this fall anyway, so perhaps my story doesn’t really matter.

        But the story isn’t about changing anyone’s views on what is the “best” measuring system to use. It’s about the foolishness of it all. G20/G21 the machines no longer care, why do you?

        • dellish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Did Donald Trump just reply to me? That rambling story intertwining word salad, along with the misreading of DECIMALIZED has me convinced.

          Although I’m enjoying the thought of decriminalized numbers now.

          • Bluewing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            OK, more directly.

            Worrying about about which measurements systems are best and making fun of them is for fools. Use the units that best fits that task at hand. And shockingly enough, it ain’t always Millimeters, centimeters, kilometers or degrees Celsius. Maybe it’s pounds, feet, miles, or AU’s and Light years.

            The US is a metric country. The federal government passed a law in the early 1970’s to make it so. They just didn’t pass a law forcing the change at a set time and date. They decided, for better or worse, to let the change happen organically. And change it has. Go in any grocery store and look at the food on the shelf, it’s all clearly marked in US customary and grams/kilos. I know every pound of butter I buy is 454grams. My whisk(e)y/wine, (choose the spelling you prefer), comes in 750ml bottles. A bottle of soda comes in 2 liter bottles.My FDM printers use 1 kilo spools of filament. We are all looking for that same missing 10mm socket just like the rest of the world. And no one gives a rat’s arse about how many feet are in a mile. Except surveyor’s and civil engineers, a very small and specialized subset.

            Did you know there is a error in what the meter actually is? And it’s been there from the very beginning. One of the guys sent to make the original measurements decided that drinking wine in sunny Spain was better than climbing mountains and dealing with bad weather just to measure some silly distance. So he fudged it. The error has been known for quite a while and never corrected. It’s still there even after the switch from using a physical item to define a meter to how far light travels in a set time, (now THERE’S a silly random looking string of numbers). Not very scientific or accurate to ignore the error now is that? I thought the metric system was better than that.

            Again for the slow learners, G20/G21 the machines don’t care and no one else should care anymore either.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    It was an international group that met in France that created the metric system.

  • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    The British have a stupid mix of Imperial and metric. We usually measure distance in meters/centimeters but feet and inches are still used fairly regularly especially if you’re measuring the height of a person. Large distances are usually measured in miles unless you’re going for a run in which case you probably use km. Then you go for a drive and measure your speed in miles per hour, and your fuel efficiency in miles per gallon. Except you now need to fill up so you go to the petrol station where the prices are listed in pence per litre. Most other liquids are also measured in litres unless you’re buying milk or beer.

    Then if you’re weighing things you probably use metric, unless you’re weighing a person or you’re an old person cooking. Temperature is also measured in celcius unless you’re old.

    • Wörk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      Don’t forget to give your weight in stones and a horses height in hands…

      • knowone@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        And the size of your land in acres/hectares. And a lot of ingredients in cups (which has never been a set amount in the UK since its beginning). And distance sometimes in yards

        • joel_feila@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          At least area in acres does avoid the issue of 10 square unit. Does that a 10 by 10 square or a square with a Total area of 10?

    • jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      We even measure the same thing using different standards. The three tyre measurements are taken in mm, mm, and inches.

      I put it down to us being smarter than everyone else.

    • robocall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      I guess the silver lining for the British is they have more familiarity with both types of measurements than the purests.

    • Javi@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      Actually we use both. For example, body weight is (traditionally) stone and lbs, but parcel weight is usually kg.

      The same is true for length; height in feet, but stuff like room measurements in cm.

      I think the only area where we’re actually consistent is traveling distance? All signs and gauges are in Mph rather than Km/h. In fact the only time I can think of someone talking about distance in kilometres, is to do with sports (IE a 5k/10k running event).

      • meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Brits should never lecture someone on having a sane measurement system when even Americans are more consistent.

        Like say what you want but a pound is a pound whether it’s at the grocery store or on my bathroom scale.

        • Javi@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Do you think lbs change depending on what we’re measuring? A lb is a lb here too…

          I’d argue a comprehension of both metric and imperial is superior, as well as provides insight into which the inferior measurement is, but you do you mate.

  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    One problem metric solved was that each country had their own value for inch, mile, pound etcetera. This is partially fixed by everyone but the US going to metric. But I highly encourage everyone to ask “Okay, but is that a Swedish mile, nautical mile, Roman mile, or Chinese mile?” whenever miles comes up with Americans. Similar for inches, feet, and so on.

    • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      But I highly encourage everyone to ask “Okay, but is that a Swedish mile, nautical mile, Roman mile, or Chinese mile?” whenever miles comes up with Americans.

      I find it tedious when someone pretends not to understand a conversation just to make some academic point, don’t you?

    • joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      He jokes on you i only use kilofeet when talking about long distance. Now everyone is confused by saying 318 kft.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    American recipes are the worst. Two fingers of milk, a cup of sugar, one box of pre-packed cake mix, a glass of corn syrup…

    They’re allergic to actual measurements.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    That second phrase can be useful information…

    How many double-sized hamburgers is it? 600?

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago
      1. But don’t be fooled. Between brain, bones, and waste you’ll only get get 200 double quarter pounders out of them. A little more if you add beef or pork fat to make them juicy.

      ETA: I have no fucking clue what is going on with the formatting.

      • Rose@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        Easiest way to avoid formatting the list is to put a backslash before the dot:

        12345\. Blah blah...
        

        This was a common problem in Reddit in NaNoWriMo when people posted their daily wordcounts and what they had been doing.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        X. is what Lemmy uses for numbered lists. So
        `1. Stuff

        1. Stuff

        2. Stuff ` Becomes

        3. Stuff

        4. Stuff

        5. Stuff

        To avoid that you could write 400\. rather than 400.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Ha, yeah. I wasn’t thinking about it. It’ll just stay as a list starting with 400 then.

          You’re awesome for letting me know for next time.

  • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    To be fair it does help put into perspective how much of an animal (in this case deer) would make up as a burger

    I prefer measuring in football field turf rolls though