“Obama/Biden were good for Europe”

Were they though? I mean really?

They convinced the entire western world to depend on them for military protection as America has been doing since the end of WWII, knowing full well that when push comes to shove they are still under the American government, and they used that Hard power to gain soft power in everything from trade to economics to diplomacy, the USA has been slowly accumulating power all while convincing Europe to disarm.

Trump is no more against Europe than the rest of the presidents he’s just an idiot who showed the mice the cheese in the trap.

Gotta say, for all y’all mocked the good ol US of A, you sure put a lot of faith in it. Trust to a fault.

A government is a collection of people working together to maintain power.

It does not include everyone because they simply do not need everyone, given the trillions of dollars they have they could easily afford to pay for as many people as they need if that was the most efficient use of their money, given they can increase to the size of the population under one unified cause we can assume a fragmented group of people with there own agendas would be a less effective force than the majority of stable government’s

How about this:

Violence is never a good solution but a necessary one and one any functioning government will prevent its populous from using against themselves or else they would no longer function as a a government so the best we can ask for is a government that does the least harm and considering we have had a longer span of peace than any preceding civilisation then we can conclude a violent uprising would cause more harm than good so we should except the status quo given it’s net benefit to the collective, however there will inevitably be those who society is less beneficial too so much so that a revolution would be beneficial but the individual cannot rule the collective because that would be a dictator and no stable society could exist when one man has grievances against it can dismantle it so we must always weigh the the against the benefits heavily before considering any sort of rebellion while simultaneously keeping in mind the overwhelming likelihood that it will outright fail given the powerful by definition have more power than the weak and include the resulting loss in our calculation.

What do you think? To wordy or will it catch on?

Hell hath no furry like a pussy scorned.

Hmmm, free meal or risk my life to pay, now that is a difficult decision.

Tbf, how many plants are carnivorous monsters that dissolve your flesh

And how many animals can melt Rocks into Magic snap Rocks camouflage them and plan months in advanced

And how many developers can

export EDITOR=nano export VISUAL=nano

You should put your high school diploma and a stack of cash in your window.