Nope. That’s not an explanation for why all of the conflicts I listed including the war with ISIS in Iraq, which is still happening (sounds like a forever war to me) are not Trump’s fault.
You have not explained why none of those are Trump’s fault and yet the wars you are talking about are Biden’s fault. Please explain.
Okay the Trump is responsible for all of these wars and military conflicts since they happened under his watch:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nagorno-Karabakh_conflict
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamwina_Nsapu_rebellion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_in_Rakhine_State_(2016–present)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kasese_clashes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency_in_Chad_(2016–present)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Afghanistan–Pakistan_border_skirmish
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017–2020_Qatif_unrest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Marawi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglophone_Crisis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency_in_Cabo_Delgado
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Iraqi–Kurdish_conflict
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catatumbo_campaign
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Armenian–Azerbaijani_clashes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLA_insurgency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2018_Gaza–Israel_clashes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_India–Pakistan_border_skirmishes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_2019_Gaza–Israel_clashes
Oh yeah, and…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_insurgency_in_Iraq_(2017–present)
I believe you described all of that as “very peaceful” earlier.
Looking forward to the explanation for how ISIS in Iraq isn’t Trump’s fault even though somehow it’s Biden’s fault that Russia invaded Ukraine.
Neither of those were started by Biden. Why did you say they were?
Also, what progress? Russia just drone bombed the Chernobyl concrete dome.
Which wars in specific were the “forever wars” that Biden started that Trump then stopped? Which countries did Biden invade with the military he controls? Name them.
I said he is threatening to start them. Read before you respond.
Also, the president, despite what you and Trump think, is not the emperor of the world and cannot stop other countries from starting wars. Trump won’t be able to either if that’s what some other country decides to do. He doesn’t have magic powers like you seem to think he does.
I know that Biden didn’t start any wars and also that even if he did, they weren’t in Somalia. Or Panama. Or Greenland. Or Canada.
You’re really not good at being deceptive, so maybe you should stop trying.
He was bombing Somalia two weeks ago: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdrye506z1go
He has threatened to go to war with Panama, Greenland and fucking Canada.
Either you’re ignorant of what Trump is doing or you’re just lying. Neither is a good look.
Trump is literally threatening wars all over the planet right now. Are you really that ignorant about what is going on in your own country? What your own president is saying literally on a daily basis?
The something new being support for ruthless dictators? Is that the sort of new thing you think is good?
What does the number of votes have to do with her support of a ruthless dictator like Bashar Assad? All that proves is that Republicans are fine with her supporting a horrible ruthless dictator that tortured and murdered countless people. You can make this about her race and gender all you like, but all you’re doing is ignoring the quotes of her saying literal things and support of both him and Russia in that article. Not that I’m surprised that you’re ignoring her actual words that she said. It makes it much easier to defend her if you ignore them. Not honest, but easier.
Do you think that maybe being pro-Assad and praising Russia for backing him might make her a poor choice for the role she’s been handed?
Cool. How about the fact that she was very pro-Assad and praising Russia for backing him?
You can read the literal words she says in that article, but something tells me you won’t.
Yes, but it’s something he and Harry’s late racist grandmother would agree on. So there’s that.
The incarceration rate? The thing you said had to do with poverty? Are you not reading your own posts?
If it were largely to do with poverty, it would not be so radically higher for black women.
Easier to get a job if you’re white whether male or female, easier to get a loan, a home, anything that requires someone to approve what you’re doing. Also easier if you’re a black man. If you’re a black woman? Especially one with a “black” name? You’re often fucked. Many studies have shown this.
And then there’s the incarceration rate.
https://www.nbwji.org/post/extreme-sentences-disproportionately-impact-and-harm-black-women
It means that white women have a lot less to worry about right now.
White women will not have that level of worry until long after the black women are gone.
I didn’t ask for an argument, I asked for an explanation. Apparently you don’t have one.