In case you’re still lost as to what the heck is going on, a Scientology Run is when people film themselves charging into a Church of Scientology building to see how far they can get before being caught and booted out. It’s a notoriously secretive religion, so it turns the whole place into an action-movie set piece where the protagonist is trying to infiltrate a compound while fending off its legion of foot soldiers, clad in terrifying white button-ups with black vests.

  • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    9 days ago

    On the one hand, this is very funny. On the other hand, however, it’s still very funny, but also maybe we shouldn’t turn running full speed into a house of religion, no matter how hokey that religion may be, into a trend? Yes, the whole enterprise is shady at best, and they believe in some weird space alien magic. They also have a history of harassing former members and anyone who dares to pull back the veil on the secretive organization’s scare tactics.

    Fuck off with this whitewashing. Scientology isn’t “hokey” or “shady”. It’s outright evil.

  • brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    9 days ago

    This isn’t a genz novelty, there were a lot of activism in the early 4chan days against Scientology. The whole guy fawks mask and anonymous thing started there.

    • aldhissla@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      9 days ago

      Came here for this. We had Project Chanology in my day. As long as there’s Scientology, the youth will continue to milk them for lulz.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 days ago

        lol yeah, those were the days - the LA scene for that was interesting, and it also gave me my first real taste of opsec, because the CoS goons would absolutely dox and harass you and people close to you if you weren’t careful.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 days ago

          The little known trivia here is that the ‘Anonymous Mask’ wasn’t intended to be serious. It was first used to troll the CoS.

          It came from the Epic Fail guy meme, the purpose was to call Scientology lame while also protecting their identities.

          It wasn’t until the regular media started reporting on Project Chanology that it become the symbol that the public thinks of when they hear ‘the group Anonymous’.

          Later, during Occupy Wall Street, it was used a bit less Ironically because it was already known from the Project Chanology days and also because people still needed to hide their face or risk federal prosecution (i.e. Lulzsec).

          Seeing the new generation of Internet trolls starting their career by taking up the Chanology fight… well, we will watch their career with great interest.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Of all the brainrot fads I’ve seen come and go over the past few decades, I think this is the one I like the most. Anything that pisses off the CoS gets my seal of approval.

  • lama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    8 days ago

    But maybe a better use of Scientology infiltration tactics would be an investigative piece rather than a viral speed run.

    The irony of the journalist writing this and missing that this is their job

      • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I read that as “fucked them in the balls with no lube” and I really liked the way it sounded.

    • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s pretty common mentality among a lot of adults that the fucked up world will just have to be fixed by the kids. It’s fucking absurd.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    9 days ago

    Seems to me if you did some research, came up with a cover story and dressed the part, you could walk in and get pretty far before being caught. Just pretend you’re on your mission year, and wear a nametag.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      Seems to me if you did some research, came up with a cover story and dressed the part, you could walk in and get pretty far before being caught.

      That’s how you get organ farmed.

    • bedwyr@piefed.caBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      Until they figure out you are an imposter and kidnap you. These people are rather known for retaliating against members that quit at least, and have been accused of kidnapping multiple times.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I guess I’m fine with these stupid tiktok prank videos as long as everyone involved is an asshole!

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 days ago

    but also maybe we shouldn’t turn running full speed into a house of religion, no matter how hokey that religion may be, into a trend?

    No. The whole thing was started by a bad sci-fi author who felt he could make a lot of money by inventing a fake religion. It’s just a scam to rip off gullible people. Hopefully, enough mockery will make prospective joiners think twice before they get taken for all their money.

    “You don’t get rich writing science fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a religion.'” - L Ron Hubbard

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      who felt he could make a lot of money by inventing a fake religion. It’s just a scam to rip off gullible people. Hopefully, enough mockery will make prospective joiners think twice before they get taken for all their money.

      which is different than any other religion how? Everyone wants an angle to power or money.

      Before I get the “so edgy” nonsense: At least lets remove tax exempt status from all religions. People can gather and listen to what ever crap they want but it should not be aided by government in any way.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 days ago

    it’s trespassing with the added benefit of a dice roll on the building security’s understanding of castle doctrine.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 days ago

      Or even just getting hit in the head by a well-meaning person who reasonably thinks they’re trying to prevent a maniac from killing someone in the building.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 days ago

    Can they try Mormon temples next? Please? That would be so fucking funny.

    I am crying at the mental image of a bunch of retirees in white suits and white dresses trying to politely shepherd a bunch of teenagers with phones out of their crystal-covered collection of big living rooms.

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      It would be difficult, idk anything about Scientology but I’ve spent time in Mormon temple. Scientology buildings are more like offices I think and the temple has tons of locked doors

  • Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 days ago

    I dunno. These are cracking me up for some reason and even though this article is a bit shallow, I think a decent point was made at the end: power charging religious buildings is kinda bad taste I think - even if Scientology is full of complete asshole weirdos.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sounds like something a religious person would say to feel like their religion is more sensible.

          • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 days ago

            Give it a few more generations, and it’ll look like Mormonism (originally an obviously scammy personality cult with a problematic founder, but now a respectable pillar of conservative society). Another century or two and it’ll be like Lutheranism or Episcopalianism: so much part of the background that people don’t even notice the weird stuff in its doctrines.

        • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s pretty well documented that L. Ron Hubbard founded Scientology to serve as a financial tool. Hence the financial controversies and the IRS battles from the 70s-90s

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              9 days ago

              There’s a clear difference between an organisation intentionally created as a cult in living memory and one which, as far as we all know, arose organically from the sincere beliefs of people.

              It doesn’t make the beliefs of one more true or something, it’s just a useful categorisation.

              • architect@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                You just said the difference is time and the fact no one can remember the religions founding. Which is no clear difference at all.

                • FishFace@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Well that’s not quite what I said. But either way, I think it’s pretty clear. What are some examples you think lie in the grey area?

        • Fusselwurm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          One worships God (imaginary person), the other worships a human (real person).

          inb4 “but Jesus was a man” yes. But he’s dead, and whatever remains is not “real” anymore

          • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Cults often worship gods too.

            My point is there is literally no difference other than how many people follow it. If it’s big enough, it’s a religion.

            Christianity is a cult. And a bad one.

        • architect@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s whether the person you’re talking to just happens to be a part of that religion or not, typically.

          They are all cults to me. Some just have better pr.

    • iegod@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 days ago

      On the other hand, all religions are complete weirdos and not a single one of them deserves special status or protections.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 days ago

          Control. Generally speaking a religion and a cult are differentiated by how much they demand or control in members lives. Scientology, Mormons, and even a lot of Southern Baptists are generally cults or really cult like. For comparison Anglicans, Quakers, and progressive Neo-Pagans are on average not cults even if they are insane and playing with the dynamics at times.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            The hallmarks of cults is: separation from friends or family, a person or ruling body that delivers the one and true version, punishment for rule breaking, and a difficulty separating. Also, it almost always devolves into sex slavery and/or arranged unions.

            Those things give you control of course, but they are the basic guidelines of cult like behaviour.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yeah there are probably dozens of definitions of cult with tonnes of overlap but without complete agreement. Just a notable example is there are some cults which pop up wherein they don’t necessarily have a ruling body since it’s basically a cavalcade of idiots feeding into each other.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 days ago

              Depended on region and what period of the medieval era, for example Iceland around 1000 absolutely not, but in France during the crusades absolutely was. Remember the medieval era lasted about a thousand years and was spread across Europe so there’s lots of nuance.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      No. No it’s not at all.

      Religion is in bad taste. And before you come at me, go witness a few religious atrocities first. Like Gaza.