Vibrators are fine but when I whip out the premium™️ silicone vagina / asshole combo with a high speed self lubricating vortex cervix and the 36GG BIG TIDDY™️ attachment with Alexa integration I’m ruining he mood 🙄
It’s because you aren’t using the cum collection tray attachment, it’s a game changer trust me
with Alexa integration
“I’m about to cum… Alexa play Despacito”
You misspelled El Sonidito.
vortex cervix
🤌🤌🤌
And they kick you out of the Walmart!
“Alexa, I’m close!”
I’ve dated a couple of girls who can’t get off without a vibrator.
It’s hard to get mad at that. They’ve got their thing and it works. If your dick or tongue can’t shake at 30 wiggles a second, why complain? So long as we both get off by the end of it, everyone has a good time.
What’s the problem?
Equally, I’ve hooked up with some guys who struggle to get off during sex itself (which may be because the grip one uses while masturbating may be firmer than what one experiences during sex).
Having slept with both women and men, I feel like the pressure to reach orgasm seems like it’s bad for everyone. One dude I knew felt super insecure about not getting off, which stemmed from a previous partner taking it personally. It’s certainly the case that for some men, it can feel uncomfortable to have sex and not reach orgasm. However, I think that everyone would have a better time if people decoupled satisfaction from orgasm.
If I wanted to be certain that I’d get off, then the use of a vibrator helps a lot. That’s not necessarily my goal though; some of the best sex I’ve ever had didn’t result in me reaching orgasm, and I find it frustrating when people don’t understand that this is possible (I find this problem more common with men). Of course, that’s just personal to me — some people may consider reaching orgasm to be an essential part of “good sex”, but that’s why good communication is the best skill one can develop for better sex.
The stories you’ve lived are the ones that seem more meaningful. For a guy, climax is a given, and sometimes the whole point just for maintenance purposes. The wholesome joy of a thing is made impure by ulterior motives. It took me a while to see it from the other side.
If your dick or tongue can’t shake at 30 wiggles a second, why complain?
I would imagine for the same reason that women complain about men who cant cum without their pornhub deathgrip…
Agree. People dont like being replaced with meaningless objects. People can also rationalize and become used to nearly anything.
Sometimes you just don’t have time. Like, brother… Come on… I’m almost 40. It’s not as easy to jackhammer my wife at the perfect angle for 25 straight minutes anymore. It’s better for everyone, her included, if she helps rub that shit out and we can both be asleep by 10pm. We have work tomorrow, and you know our daughter’s going to come pitter-pattering in here at 4:30am to say she’s hungry because she couldn’t be fucked to eat more than two beans and a half a chicken tender the night prior.
Should be able to elicit an orgasm with oral in far less than 40 minutes.
Sure, if your SO is into it. Many aren’t.
Also, it’s not one or the other, variety is good.
Well, people arent immutable, and romance and intimacy develops over time. I’d say a guy or girl who needs very specific conditions to orgasm has some intimacy issues. I’d imagine people might not want to be with people who have hangups like that.
Oh my bad, sorry, I meant to say everyone’s perfect the way they are, of course.
Alright then. You win comment of the day.
deleted by creator
Thanks for letting me know what that sounded like. Next time I’ll add an /s at the end so that the dim individuals among us (not you, of course…) can more easily recognize humor on a sub that’s devoted to it.
Try being a parent before judging one. Everything here rings true to someone with a young child and bills to pay.
Yup, I love them, but their whining can get real old.
I would have no issue with vibrator usage, since that’s a tool, not a person. But I don’t think I want anyone else dunking on my gf while I make the alley-oop.
From the emasculated male perspective, LeBron is the competitor, not your teammate.
While I comple agree with her, you’re right that metaphor is kind of … meh. Like I get what she’s trying to say it’s just that you can twist that metaphor in some uncomfortable ways.
Btw the magic wand is the answer if you don’t like the vibrator idea
Btw the magic wand is the answer if you don’t like the vibrator idea
The magic wand…vibrator?
Even if the guy just plays basketball as a hobby, I’m walking.
Well putting it like that is kinda belittling. I hear it as “well, sorry, you ain’t no LeBron James.” Is that the joke?
Not the sentiment though. If the woman wants some fun with a vibrator, go to town! Tell me to jump, and I’ll ask how high. Get your partner to have fun, however they want; it is not that complicated.
She’s framing the guy as the assistant to the vibrator which is insulting at best. Although I think this is a comedian making a joke, so probably shouldnt take it so serious.
Yeah, its a decent joke TBH.
Isn’t it all about having pleasant fun together?
Yes, and for me the indirect feeling of the vibrator as part of sex is massive turn on. Also directly in certain positions. Or knowing she use it to get off by herself because being jealous of that would be like her being jealous of my hand.
It is an addition to the fun, like lingerie or lube or anything else.
We god fearing Christian folk don’t use any kind of lewd objects when engaging in activities designed to expand the kingdom. They will turn you from an upstanding citizen in to a degenerate back-alley harlot faster than you can say “forgive me father for I have sinned”. We get two minutes of dry missionary sex once a month with blindfolds on and only the smallest amount of movement possible to procreate. Anything more is shameful and should be outlawed post haste.
A faithful’s image of “expand the kingdom”…

Muscular Christianity (its real, look it up) is the basis of all modern toxic masculinity.
And to be why it’s fun…otherwise…why be there?
Wonder how she’d feel if instead of her needing a physical aid, it would be him needing a visual aid.
It’s like, if Mia Khalifa is on your team … Are you mad that she scored more points than you?
they are different senses, doesn’t really work as an analogy
a super tight fleshlight would probably work better, which can also vibrate
they are different senses, doesn’t really work as an analogy
It works just fine. Men tend to be more visually oriented, for women the physical part is often the limiting factor to reach a climax.
In both cases something external is added to get over the other party’s “inadequacies”.
Dont even need that, plenty of dudes have issues where they prefer porn and masturbation to intimacy with their partner.
i dont have a partner, but i am (trying) to get over a porn/masturbation addiction myself right now…it’s…way tougher than it feels like it should be, but then i guess really thinking back it’s an addiction i’v had nearly 15+ years now.
so i guess it’s no surprise some people have that issue continue while being in relationship
Its a much bigger societal problem than people want to admit. Good on you for admitting its an addiction, being aware of negative consequences is a big part of overcoming something. There are support groups for this stuff and it can help to have people who you can talk to that yoy might be embarrassed to talk to friends and family about.
If the guy has trouble reaching orgasm, sure. But in most straight relationships I’m familiar with it tends to go the other way, where the female partner needs more help to finish.
An e-bike wouldn’t do much for Jonas Vingegaard, but it can be a game changer for someone who struggles with gentle hills.
in most straight relationships I’m familiar with
So because it doesn’t happen to you, it doesn’t happen to anyone. Ok.
It’s probably a little bit rarer than the other way around, but male anorgasmia exists especially as men get older.
But as usual, male feelings and sexual problems are ridiculed and swept under the rug as unimportant.
That is emphatically not what I said.
I was just sharing my experience since it informed the way I interpreted the joke. I think it makes sense for her to talk about using a vibrator with partners since that’s probably something she has experienced.
Casting this joke as ‘male feelings being ridiculed’ is so strange. She’s talking about her own feelings, making light of the expectations her partners have set.
It’s not bigoted or mean spirited. The joke is fine.
Emasculated goes a bit far but I kinda get it. It doesnt bother me if a sexual encounter starts with a toy, but “let me grab my vibrator so I can finish” is a night that ends with me feeling like I’m not good enough and probably going to bed feeling bad about myself. It’s something thats turned a few dates into one night stands for me when I told them how it made me feel and they were dismissive of my feelings
If they can’t get off from PIV and want a vibration to get over the edge, that shouldn’t affect your feelings about adequacy. Unless you can vibrate your dick at 500rpm, it’s not you.
Instructions unclear, phrenum is spasming at about 8hz
You can sort of emulate a vibrator with the bridge of your nose and humming really loud, just saying
This is a tough one without further context. Were you making diligent efforts to reciprocate pleasure and they gave even though you felt you were making inroads? Did you make it clear that you wanted to get them off without the vibrator and they were open to that but it wasn’t working?
I think the way you felt is fair. I think attentive partners want to reciprocate pleasure and ideally do it with just their presence if the situation allows. I wonder how they would have responded if you said you wanted to try without it or if they felt there would be deeper meaning (rather than pure hedonism) to not using the vibrator.
I never considered this would bother anyone. The vibrator gets used probably over half the time my partner and I have sex. Even when she cums from oral and we move to PIV then when I’m getting ready I’ll hand her the vibrator when I’m getting close because her climaxing again makes it hit a lot harder for me. Usually I’m inside of her actively while she uses it but on rare occasions when I go clean up she will stay back and finish for another time.
Jesus Christ that was descriptive. But yeah same here.
Yeah, very wordy. I feel weird.
No issues… Sometimes you gotta think of her sister to finish so fair is fair…
As long as my woman has an earth-shattering orgasm, I don’t care how she gets there.
Do you care of you’re not a meaningfull part of it?
It’s not about me.
So…no…or?
Do you think a vibrator being involved and being a meaningful part of an orgasm are mutually exclusive? Hint: They’re absolutely not.
What part are you playing, that is as equally meaningful as being the direct stimulus that is necessary for orgasm, that isn’t also present when one is the direct stimulus? Being what brings a woman to orgasm is about as meaningful as it gets when it to comes to sex, next to the intimacy.
If you believe the only reason to have sex is to reach an orgasm and that the only valuable contribution to it is being the one that does it, then sure, but there’s so much more to it than that.
Now, I wanna be clear. I’m not telling you how to have sex. I’m not saying the way you want to have it is wrong. If you want to be the one doing it and no vibrators involved, there’s nothing wrong with that. But acting like that’s the only way to have sex? No, there are so many more.
Yet you can’t specify any that aren’t covered by orgasm or intimacy?
Do you want me to talk about my sexual preferences?
I think being there while she does it is a turn on.
Is never being why she orgasms a turn on?
Watching her orgasm is. Plus cunnilingus usually works.
Then she doesn’t need the vibrator…
If she get multiple earth shattering orgasms, it’s even better.
I’m not emasculated by it, and very much enjoy it. Hitachi magic wands are so much fun. Thrusting rabbits are a delight.
But….
The ones that are realistic penis replicas….
I get a bit turned off looking down and seeing a veiny flesh-colored penis in my hand. Just kinda takes me out of the moment. If I were bi, I’m sure it’d be lovely. But it’s just not for me.
Do whatever gets the job done. So many unnecessary hangups.
If she needed me to kill a chicken for her to get off, I’d ring that poor little bastard’s neck (the chicken’s, just to be clear.)
My love life involves a lot of choking the chicken too.
She gets hers and he gets his. Wheres the problem?
Maybe ask her if you can do anything to replace the vibrator and when she says you can vibrate her clit with your dick at 50 Hz, you tell her to just use the vibrator.If men had to jerk themselves off after piv just to cum, women would not take that well, just saying.
Incorrect. I’d much rather the guy finish himself off than hump me raw trying to get off. Sometimes it’s just not happening, and that’s okay!
lol I remember once with my last partner when I could tell she wasn’t really into it anymore, and like fine I got the intimacy I’m here for already so I’m good, so I proposed stopping and then she kinda got offended/confused that I hadn’t finished and like (1) yeah that’s fine that’s not my main goal here, and (2) neither did you fucker wtf is this double standard, we were literally just here for a quickie and I wanted physical contact, not to cum














