That’s like going full kamikaze, wrecking your opponent and somehow surviving the act.
So really only like half kamikaze
She had more balls than him
oh so you’ve seen the pics
I love how this gif loops
It loops perfectly! It took me a few laps to understand that it’s looping
What a woman.
Reminds me of the Paris woman who testified to her abuser. Was in tabloids. Called that monster out.
The strength it takes is awe inspiring.
I really loved how she was recognised pretty unanimously as the badass that she is. Society has a lot of deeply rooted problematic beliefs around sexual assault, but Gisèle Pélicot’s bravery was a definite step towards unravelling those icky attitudes.
“The shame needs to switch sides.”
Gisèle Pélicot ?
Thank you.
How do you attack future girlfriends? I would love to know who my future girlfriends are going to be I need this technology.
You can see who he has been liking and viewing on social media. That would be my best guess.
So… what did you say that link was?
I knew where the link was going without clicking it. I still clicked and enjoyed.
2008 called for you but they didn’t leave a msg.
They should know I only communicate through MSN Messenger these days. Good thing it’ll be around forever!
Never going to give you up…
The youths don’t even know how to guard against edging.
Badass
and then everyone clapped
Nothing ever happens.
A weird way to say you believe everything on the internet.
Good analysis of the “nothing ever happens” Team Apathy trend.
It’s not that nothing ever happens, it’s that attention-spans are now a commodity and when you read so many headlines meant to capture that attention span like, “SCIENTISTS HORRIFIED BY STRUCTURES DISCOVERED UNDER MARS” or “EYEBALL PLANET FOUND IN SPACE” (both actual headlines I saw recently) and then it turns out to be just normal stories about science or the like, you start to feel like nothing is real, and if nothing is real then nothing really happens.
If you turn off your media feed and just seek out news on the things you’re interested in without letting the algorithm drag you around by the ballsack, you will be smarter and appreciate the amazing, terrifying fantastic and fascinating things that happen every day.
This is the way. Take your bodily autonomy back ladies. They can’t hurt you as much if you make your vulnerabilities into a weapon
Link or it didn’t happen
I believe in you pug Jesus.
🙏
Just as the old adage goes - what would PugJesus do?
What’s wrong with people? He doubled down on his sex crime???
To be clear, both of these things are sex crimes, so don’t draw any major lessons from either side, aside from “don’t fuck with people.”
… publishing your own nudes is a sex crime?
Every morning I human traffic myself to work.
Then i slave away
To an audience that isn’t interested in seeing them, yeah. They require consent, otherwise it’s a sex crime not dissimilar to flashing. I can’t remember the specific term. Non-consensual something or other.
Edit: I still can’t remember but the word “brandishing” keeps hopping to the forefront of my mind, and brandishing tits sounds hilarious
While violation of social media ToS is possible, I find it difficult to believe that a court would regard the sex crime angle of publishing one’s own photos online seriously. Otherwise anyone linking to their OF without asking for permission to send the link first would be a sex criminal.
If the intent is to shock or harm, or it can be argued that way, it’s usually best to avoid. If you care to read up, you’re welcome to it.
To win an IIED claim, you need to prove the sender’s behavior was extreme and outrageous, they acted with intent to cause you severe emotional distress or with reckless disregard for that possibility, and that you suffered severe emotional distress as a result.
Another legal ground is invasion of privacy, specifically a claim for “intrusion upon seclusion.” This recognizes that individuals have a right to be left alone in their private affairs. Your direct messages, email inbox, and text message threads are considered private spaces. When someone intentionally intrudes by sending offensive material, it can be viewed as a highly offensive invasion of your privacy.
It would seem a very difficult argument to apply in this case.
But not impossible. It’s just an unnecessary risk.
Well, enjoy never leaving the house.
Username checks out.
21
Tagging people to let them know they exist is not forcing them on anyone.
I really don’t care to argue the point. Read up, if you care to argue it in court
That link is talking about sending images. I am saying that tagging is not sending images.
I really don’t see a meaningful distinction, but even less do I care to argue the point
You gonna put someone in jail if they tell you nude photos exist? Lmao
It varies by country, but in south Africa for example, you don’t have to prove emotional distress, the law is clear in stating that exposing someone to genitalia, anus or female breast without consent (provided it is deliberate) is an offense.
So you’re right, but in some countries, you’re more right than others.
Breasts as well? That’s surprising. How accepted are trans people in South Africa? Because there might be some confusing times ahead.
I know you’re making a bad faith argument, but I will answer anyway.
Trans people are accepted in south Africa, and offered many legal protections, including official recognition status of their preferred gender (there are certain prerequisites required to change your gender, but I don’t know what those are, I just know people who have done so). Should someone undergo gender re-assignment, and have the gender changed on their ID, it would or would not be an offense based on what gender they have transitioned to at the time the incident had occurred.
South African law is pretty forward thinking in many aspects regarding discrimination, primarily because of how racial discrimination has massively featured in our history.
Do infants consent to breast feeding? I’m sorry, I know you didn’t write the law
I don’t write the law, but for the sake of answering, consent is implicit in this case. Sexual offences must be sexual in nature, and breastfeeding is not sexual. So any mother breastfeeding her child in public would be exempt from prosecution of such a sexual offence. Many traditional ceremonies are also conducted in traditional attire whereby the woman are topless. This is also not regarded as sexual and anyone attending such an event must implicitly consent here as well.
Our law makes many provisions for the reasonable man. So if you happen to stumble upon a nude beach (official status or otherwise), and be exposed to a female breasts, it would not be unlawful as people on this beach reasonably expected the people there to have consented. You could be charged with other offences such as public indecency if official nude beach status is not granted at that beach, but it would not be a sexual offence. Also, the prosecutors would likely be hesitant to waste the courts time on that, and drop the case. So the cops would likely just ask you to cover up if a complaint is received.
Our law is pretty good in that regards, it’s our police and investigative side that is over worked and under skilled, mixed with loads of socio economic issues, that result in overloaded courts and high crime rates that we have.
No, the lesson is not to be filth and blackmail your partner(s).
I sincerely doubt it’s a crime to upload your own nudes to OnlyFans and then tell your abusive ex-partner’s family, “hey, this is a link to the nude pictures your child threatened to post online if I broke up with them”. My grandma has accidentally shared worse things with me than that
I read your link below and do not understand what you mean by sex crime for sharing your own nude images (with adults). The link mentions a law for your own nude images being shared without consent, but that and everything else just guides a path to sue in civil court.
