ExLisper Site
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Gsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
3 months ago

Switzerland dug a hole the size of two soccer fields to install the world’s most powerful underground battery, able to output 1.2 GW within milliseconds.

www.ecoticias.com

external-link
message-square
103
link
fedilink
481
external-link

Switzerland dug a hole the size of two soccer fields to install the world’s most powerful underground battery, able to output 1.2 GW within milliseconds.

www.ecoticias.com

Gsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
3 months ago
message-square
103
link
fedilink
Switzerland dug a hole the size of two soccer fields to install the world’s most powerful underground battery, able to release 1.2 GW in milliseconds and store 2.1 GWh at a multibillion-dollar price tag
www.ecoticias.com
external-link
Switzerland’s giant underground battery could reshape Europe’s power grid with 1.2 GW released in milliseconds.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    3 months ago

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      great scott

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    3 months ago

    Goddammit, they are 0.01 Gigawatt short of time travel. 😋

    • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      It says “over 1.2” which means you know what some engineer gave the spec as.

  • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 months ago

    The article doesn’t explain the battery, making it a bullshit site if you ask me, here is what they are talking about:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery

    'The vanadium redox battery (VRB), also known as the vanadium flow battery (VFB) or vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB), is a type of rechargeable flow battery which employs vanadium ions as charge carriers.[5] The battery uses vanadium’s ability to exist in a solution in four different oxidation states to make a battery with a single electroactive element instead of two.[6]

    For several reasons, including their relative bulkiness, vanadium batteries are typically used for grid energy storage, i.e., attached to power plants/electrical grids.[7] ’

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think I understand any better what the battery is then I did before. As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don’t actually already understand.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        Here’s the short version.

        A normal battery is a sealed cell. It has a positive and negative electrode, with an electrolyte between them. Usually many layers of this. When you charge it, a chemical change happens. When you discharge it, that chemical change is undone.

        A redox flow battery uses fixed electrodes, but a liquid electrolyte that can be pumped and stored. This means you can increase overall storage capacity simply by adding more electrolyte tanks, without needing more electrodes. Think of it like a generator with a bigger gas tank.

        The whole vanadium thing is just one of the metals used in the battery. There’s a few kind of redox flow batteries using different chemistries

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Also there are hundreds of chemical combinations that produce electricity that we know about, and only a handful have been worked on for batteries. As reported in Harper’s Magazine many years back, that is not indexed to enshitified search engines, because fuck you (us, google, et al talking.)

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fry: I get it! So if the simplified bucket explanation gets full, you just add more buckets!

          • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes exactly. If you need more total capacity you add more tanks, if you need more instantaneous output power you add more electrodes. And thus you can scale either one without messing with the other.

        • jakobmn@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Thank you! That is a smart solution to inrease capacity!

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            The downside is that does batteries are not be energy dense. Perfect for grid storage but useless for car batteries (where the bulk of battery R&D money goes).

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah wikipedia is hit or miss, especially as technical people like to show off their fancy words and explain things in ways only technical people understand.

        But it’s Vanadium, and you can look that up elsewhere. The first large industrial vanadium battery (if I recall,) was some years back, I think in WA State.

        • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          If I really want to feel stupid, I go to the Wikipedia article for some simple maths concept I thought I understood

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah I think people who enjoy math and formulas and proofs also enjoy writing Wikipedia articles in the same way. I usually go to the Simple English Wikipedia for any math topics. And I got as far as calc 2 in college, so I’m no ignoramus.

          • Aniki@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            oh yeah, i read up yesterday what a polynomial is. hah.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          There is Wikipedia in Simple English, but they don’t cover all topics.

      • Aniki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        source: wikipedia (link above)

        As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don’t actually already understand.

        but it’s true, i have encountered exactly this phenomenon many times :/

    • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I heard this on a different situation I would have thought this is an AI hallucination.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 months ago

    1.21 Jiggowatts?! Is there a GIF?

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, only a GIF.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        Great Scott!

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        You pronounce the G the same way as in gigawatt.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          But what about the F? Is it pronounced like phhhh, or like ffffff?

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            ffffff which can be written fff and is pronounced white

        • Soulphite@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes, jiggawatt. Duh.

          Now where’s the Jif?

          • MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Boromir didn’t grow up in the kingdom of Jondor.

    • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      • grissino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        This meme is so appropriate in that scene, it tickles me 😀

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      What the hell is a jiggawatt?!

  • Imperious_melange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Cheers for putting the legwork in, they’re even cooler than I thought

    • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think that’s the same kind of battery technology as explained in this video. Most certainly not the same chemistry used, but same in principle

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I read some years back about I think the first big heavy industrial vanadium battery being built for some washington state company if I recall.

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The headline looks wrong, but it actually isn’t.

    The article specifies:

    • Total capacity: 2.1GWh
    • Peak output: 1.2GW
    • Ramp up time: a few milliseconds

    That’s what the “within milliseconds” in the title refers to.

    Every power generator has a ramp up time. Think the time it takes to start the engine in a diesel generator, until it spins up and is able to output peak power.

    Nuclear reactors can hare ramp-up times of hours, in some conditions even days.

    This thing here can go from zero to peak output within almost no time, which makes it perfect to balance the sometimes erratic and unpredictable generation fluctuations of renewable energy production.

    For comparison, coal or gas power generators usually have large flywheels that, once spinning, react almost instantly to power fluctuations in the network by converting their motion to electricity or the other way round. If these coal or gas generators aren’t running, they can’t be used to balance the fluctuations in the network, so battery solutions like the one in OP are required to actively manage the network stability.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thanks, I edited the headline to make it clearer, but this community is overrun with confidently incorrect folks.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        …this community - oh, you mean social media! Yes, quite true.

    • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s like a huge capacitor on my hobby electronics brain.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s pretty much the job, except a billion times as large.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Perfect power source for a Death Star! The planet goes from zero to smithereens in milliseconds!

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      FYI. Hydro power has similar capacity and start up times

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not quite - only the biggest hydro stations can generate a gigawatt or more, and their startup time is like 10 minutes.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          This project is only 500 MW here

          https://www.pv-magazine.de/2024/09/20/flexbase-plant-500-megawatt-redox-flow-speicher-in-der-schweiz/

          And other places say 800 MW

          Both of which are comparable to large hydro.

          Modern pumped hydro has a ramp up in the 10s of seconds range.

          Anyway. Same ballpark in terms of power.

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I must have got the 1.2GW from some comment.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s in the title so you are not mistaken. The problem is that various statistics have been reported and we don’t know what is correct.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, the downside of hydro though is that you need to have a fitting space to build it. You can’t just excavate a random field somewhere and plonk a hydro dam right there.

        In most places all easy spots for hydro are already taken.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Very true. You can build a pool on top of a mountain and pump/discharge water but it is super expensive for limited capacity.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I thought that issue was considered solved by smart inverters now?

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    We don’t know soccer fields around these parts…

    • AbsoluteAggressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Anything but the Imperial System huh?

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s 1,435 US rods square, or 1,333.6 imperial rods, simple.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          How much is that in chicken?

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            US Leghorns or British broilers? Just multiply by 3.21 and add 27. Simple.

            • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              *3.14159

              • frongt@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Sure, if you assume a spherical chicken.

                • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          So that is like 1,435 dick lengths end to end? /s

  • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wow, that’s almost 10% of a single datacenter

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    One point twenty one gigawatts?!

  • metermatic26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    • ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

  • ExLisperA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    able to output 1.2 GW within milliseconds

    By exploding?

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      When I flip the light switch in my room, I drain 6 nuclear reactors.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, that’s a bit too much a bit too fast, isn’t it?

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        1.2GWh within milliseconds would be exploding.

        Read the headline again, it only talks about GW not GWh. That means it can output 1.2GWh per hour, but it can ramp up to 1.2GW within milliseconds. And it likely can only keep that output for a very short time, which is exactly what you need to balance the fluctuations of renewable energy production.

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    this will be by far the largest vanadium flow battery in the world, especially outside china

    • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Flow batteries eat lithium batteries on paper and they are so scalable too!

    • Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wow its much bigger than Chinas.

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh wow! Switzerland! How did you get so big!?

  • darkmogool@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    How big is a soccer field?

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      About half of this hole

      • darkmogool@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Correct!

    • Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’d be 691077 regular sized hamburgers laid next to each other in a rigid grid pattern, 797502 if laid in a hexagonal pattern, 891720 if squished.

      • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        How many gallons per football field is that?

        And when I say football I men real one

      • darkmogool@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well…How big are regular sized hamburgers?

        • hateisreality@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          1/3 to half the size of your appetite.

          • darkmogool@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            hmm… that’s more like a variable than a cpnstant

            • Aniki@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              actually, it’s a parameter

              • darkmogool@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                fair…

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • darkmogool@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        because we metric users are eeeeevil

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They are not standard sized.

      • darkmogool@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This makes the comparison even more stupid xD

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Asked for comments, they kept saying “Rest assured there is no death ray plans”

    (/j)

    • Imperious_melange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        They already destroyed the world by distorting out timeline when that weasel got into the collider when it was running, just a week before harambe.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Swiss are on the frontline of climate change seeing that it is destroying their mountains which in turn are destroying their villages. Sad times.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.71K users / day
  • 8.56K users / week
  • 14.3K users / month
  • 26.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 87.4K subscribers
  • 8.55K Posts
  • 176K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.16
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org