• kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    9 days ago

    And it’s not even working. Not one of the AI companies is profitable. So they’re putting the hope for profits some time in the future over sanity and safety.

    • apftwb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      “Fuck me Sam, I don’t have anymore ideas on how to turn a profit. We’ve tried everything. How about we just give the AI its own infrastructure and bank account with the instructions ‘make money’ and see what it does? I know that safety guy advised against it before, but he no long works here. I mean if it becomes a singularity event, at least it’s our singularity event to control”

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      8 days ago

      Steve Burke (of GN) described the absurdity pretty well, within the context of the currently uncertain Nvidia and OpenAI deal:

      Nvidia offered OpenAI $100B in investment, money that it didn’t have, as long as OpenAI gave that money back to Nvidia to lease GPUs that haven’t been made, to then put in data centres that haven’t been constructed, which will be powered by electricity that hasn’t come online, to then rent to users who haven’t subscribed, to provide them features that haven’t come to fruition.

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        And hope you’ve propped up the economy enough by the end of it that the government has to bail you out…sorry i meant provide a “backstop”.

    • Yliaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      What about all the user data they sell to third parties? I’d be interested in knowing how that contributes to this

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      In a way this is what’s most scary. Because they are desperate. Any safety concerns will be damned and they are all racing to be the first who makes a breakthrough in the direction of AGI.

      If we ever get there, this is not the way it should be done. I hope they remember that we need to have a world where they can spend their money.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      So what’s the problem? This looks self-correcting to me, if none of the AI companies are profitable then they’re going to go away. Short their stock and make a fortune.

          • TechnoCat@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            8 days ago

            Imagine your entire life is viewed through the lens of actions you can take in the stock market. What a sad life.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              The companies that continue with human staff where others are replacing theirs, for example. Outsourcers providing those staff.

              • XLE@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                I’m not sure what bubble you live in, but not everybody can be a Bay Area nepo baby like you, and not being one doesn’t make them less correct.

                • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  If you’re not investing anything in anything then this really isn’t your problem.

      • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        The problem is the cost of that correction is going to fall on us. Or did we forget that the flavor of capitalism we live under is the “Privatize the profits, socialize the losses” kind. We’re not the ones in the casino, but we’re the ones who will lose our shirts when they lose.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        So what’s the problem?

        “What’s the problem” with the entire American economy being moored to a bunch of companies all acting as flaky as Enron and friends during the dot-com crash?

        Edit: just realized FaceDeer is obsessed with AI stuff, so he’s probably here just to troll with questions he already knows the answers to.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s only self correcting if the powers that be are losing money, which they aren’t because they are either liquidating important assets to pad their pockets or just using economic magic to make trillions appear out of no where. They’ll only feel it when their company or the economy collapses, and at that point they make off with their ill gotten gains

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Where’s this infinite well of investment money coming from? “Economic magic” is pretty vague.

          • TechnoCat@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            Have you not heard of inflation? It is literally the creation of new monies that the government gives to banks to give loans.

          • Attacker94@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            I wrote it intentionally vague because the reality is that we don’t know exactly how they are doing it, but we don’t need to to be able to see that there is a positive feedback loop between ai companies, cloud service providers and compute hardware manufacturers. Likely what they are doing is simply lying about their books and since the regulators have been bought already, or are simply incompotent, there is no one to say otherwise.

      • thejml@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        In the mean time they’re soaking up all the RAM, SSD and silicon processing which makes basically everything with any of those cost a lot more (like the RAM I bought for $99, 4 yrs ago thats now $560). Not to mention the power requirements and costs being passed on to the consumers that don’t want it anyway.

        They’re also screwing up the environment in ways it won’t recover from.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Which is pouring money into the manufacturers of those things. If you’re convinced the AI companies are going to collapse then just wait a little and you’ll get all those things way cheaper than they were before.

          • thejml@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            At the moment, most of that “money” is just stock in the other company. And the type of RAM and “GPU”'s being manufactured are not ones that normal consumers will use. They’re very specialized for AI en masse.

            Another thing around that is that the major manufacturers being leveraged for that gear have stated that they are not increasing production in the near future because of this. It seems they’re mostly in a “wait and see, it might just be a bubble” mode as scale up takes a lot of time and only pays off with continued demand over a long period of time.

            I’d love if it was going to be flooding the market with cheaper tech, but thats not been shown to be the case. And it’s really not worth the environmental impact in either case.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              And the type of RAM and “GPU”'s being manufactured are not ones that normal consumers will use.

              They’re using the same foundries that would make those things. I’m not saying that there’ll be a flood of “used” equipment (though there would indeed be some of that too, other companies could set up data centers much more cheaply), I’m saying that the foundries will switch back to consumer products.

              The stock is worth a lot because it can be sold for a lot. If the manufacturers don’t think the AI companies will stick around they should be selling the stock they’re receiving from them. It’s money either way. What do you think they’re doing with that money?

          • Yliaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            thanks for pointing that out.

            I’m not sure how this benefits the big corporations then. Surely they don’t have a deathwish? And aren’t stupid/incompetent enough to not see that? Else they’d not have gotten this big, right?

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 days ago

    If anybody leaves an AI company with a fat paycheck, promises to “be honest about the real problems,” and then proceeds to regurgitate things the AI company CEOs say: be suspicious.

    Exhibit A is Anthropic millionaire Mrinank Sharma, who only mentioned (future) peril from AI and AI-made bioweapons, two fictional scenarios on the short list that Anthropic officially endorses. It’s a list of things that please Anthropic investors.

    Real-world stuff like AI psychosis, poisoning people’s air, or generating CSAM doesn’t get a mention from him. There’s no profit in acknowledging those things, so he won’t.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yep there is a deep attachment amongst AI boosters to certain doom and gloom scenarios that stem from their philosophical “think tanks” which use imaginary problems (e.g. “AGI ‘misalignment’ destroying the world through turning everything into paperclips”) to lobby and alter our laws to benefit their real bosses – anthropic, open ai, and friends.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    8 days ago

    “AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety”.

    Remove “AI” from that sentence and you’ll see that’s just more normal business practices that have been going on for decades.

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      The real question is: what profit? It’s a sink hole in a hope to maximize reach

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is a ball and cup game designed to create cashflow where there is none. The ‘profit’ is the assets, dividends and capital gains the shareholder class will syphon out before the bubble bursts.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is many companies right now.

    Mine is run from the top down (all executives) by people who use LLM’s for fucking everything.

    Everyone fucking hates them at this point. We all think they are fucking trash.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    “They are putting profits over sanity and safety”

    Soooooooo, just like every other business in the history of capitolism?

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I hate to hand it to airline manufacturers, but at least when they cut corners, they actually make money. The whole AI industry still hasn’t turned a profit yet…

  • Sims@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    So they only now figured out that all Corporations and their sick shareholders are shit evil and doesn’t care about anything else than profits ?! Wtf do they think activists are doing ?

    Imagine being a Demis Hasabi, or similar cunt, voluntarily giving/developing AI technology - the most extreme power in human history - to the most evil corporation in human history, run and owned by the most evil people in the world, placed in the most evil lying empire of all times ! Wow - that is a great idea… cough…

    Well, better late than never I guess. Even for normal naive, dumb slow-thinking AI researchers. Let’s hope they start waking up from their business/market psychosis, and do some open source work - real mutually beneficial work - for us all instead of boosting the psychopath Oligarchy that runs our little world.

  • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Publicly traded companies are legally required to put profits over sanity, safety, and everything else. It’s a truly insane system we’ve put together for ourselves.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    Talents leave

    Tell me a “journalist” has no concept of mass nouns without using those words.