White House ballroom project has become costlier and larger than originally anticipated

Donald Trump encouraged those working on the construction of his new White House ballroom project to disregard traditional permitting, zoning, and code requirements, according to a new report.

Since announcing the project in July, Trump’s ballroom has become larger, costlier and more destructive than initially thought – raising concerns about whether the president is following historical rules when it comes to a White House addition.

The ballroom’s capacity, initially thought to be 650, has been raised to 900. Its cost has nearly doubled from $200 million to $350 million. Its construction, which Trump initially said would not interfere with the integrity of the current White House, has led to the destruction of the East Wing.

  • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Stop clutching your pearls and buy guns.

    Americans and ignoring the obvious solutions- can’t think of a more on-brand way to handle this

    • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      The gestapo feels emboldened to do black bag raids because they are certain the targets aren’t armed.

  • tym@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    He’s not going anywhere anytime soon, and all the checks and balances have signalled he’s got nothing to worry about.

  • Socialjusticewarrior@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    White House ballroom project has become costlier and larger than originally anticipated

    Sweeeeet.

    Donald Trump encouraged those working on the construction of his new White House ballroom project to disregard traditional permitting, zoning, and code requirements, according to a new report.

    Meh, screw those nerd pencil pushers. Some are born to scrutinize, some are born to boogy. A ballroom is for boogying, not scrutinizing.

  • cazssiew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    ‘Historical’ rules? ‘Traditional’ requirements? The fuck is up with this word choice? This article’s making it sound like those are some quaint old family traditions.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    White House ballroom project has become costlier and larger than originally anticipated

    You don’t say! And nobody except everybody expected this?

    The only other unsurprising thing here is that they managed to balloon it like that while ignoring building permits and code, as many times those cause the ballooning in some way. Incompetence and corruption go far too with ballooning though

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Would be hilarious if the schematics of the ultra secret surveillance hardware in and around the wing get leaked to a foreign party.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Why?

      Why would it have to? I mean, in pretty sure its designed and built by foreign parties, at this point

  • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    Look on the bright side; hopefully it’ll catch on fire due to an electric short, or Canada, or something, during one of Trump’s shindigs and him and nine hundred of his “friends” will get trapped inside due to overcrowding and insufficient emergency exits and will burn to death in abject agony.

  • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes! Disregard the code! Don’t even think about the building code!

    And don’t worry, the ballroom certainly won’t fall down with you inside it, piggy!

    • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have never been horny before in my life, on account of being asexual, but the thought of this ballroom collapsing under shitty building practices while housing the top thousand richest bastards in society, is certainly making me feel something hormonal.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Never in your life? I always assumed asexual meant very rarely horny, not literally never. Is that common?

        • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Forty years old, still a virgin. Sex-repulsed. Doesn’t cause a problem in my life. Immune to most advertising. Watching people make the same stupid mistakes about birth control time and time again, and never understanding why. My line ends with me and that’s fine.

          Edit: why did people downvote my answer, and not the question asked of me? Does that mean I shouldn’t have answered, or that I should have answered in a sex-positive way, or do they straight-up think ace people aren’t real?

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s a spectrum, but there are people who are literally never horny. It’s not common though.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      We should be so lucky.

      It’ll probably collapse on a kindergarten tour group while piggy is in Europe meeting with Putin.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Skipping fire permitting on a ballroom is an amazingly stupid idea. Hopefully they don’t all burn alive in the giant dumpster they’re building. crosses fingers

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I just hope it collapses around him, taking his largest donors with him. That would be a nice bit of poetic justice.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Code requirements? Dude those are not just useless regulations. Those are for your safety and the soundness of the building. Only a complete moron signs off on a build that ignores building codes. But here we are.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I expect they’ll probably follow code anyway? Because you know as soon as dipshit is out of there, they’re going to have to inspect that thing for safety reasons. And the contractor probably doesn’t want the reputation of building absolute crap.

      On the other hand, if he’s as good as picking construction contractors as he is at picking lawyers or cabinet positions, well…

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’m sure it will be built by a contracting company incorporated just for this purpose. And after this, it will be dissolved. They’ll have no reputation to defend.