You gotta have some mechanism to let low performers go.
That’s called “firing for cause.”
Of course, that actually has accountability attached to it. Misusing layoffs for that purpose is an end-run around that accountability, which is why sociopathic corporations prefer it.
Implementing additional forms of wankery in the “Metaverse”.
If a company does layoffs, they should not be allowed to hire any staff in the same or similar roles for 12 months.
Either that, or the laid-off workers should get right of first refusal for the positions. (Along with some additional incentive for the company not to game it.)
Right, and that’s what’s going to have to change: a bigger focus on things like in-person tests (including in-person bluebook essays), oral presentations/thesis defenses instead of other project deliverables, etc.
Before you can punish for using LLMs, you need to be able to reliably detect the use of LLMs, including guarding against false positives.
You can tell they’re using an LLM if they have a computer out during the pen-and-paper test.
Since Dodge v. Ford Motor Co (1919), if not earlier.
See also: https://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate-accountability-history-corporations-us/
How old counts as “classic?” I’ve been using plain ol’ “up to 10%” in my '90…
A lot of the people in my neighborhood are actually pretty friendly, in an idealized-small-town sort of way. But I live in one of those “scary” “inner-city” neighborhoods with The Blacks™ and The Gays™ and whatnot, so it’s a little different for me.
Meanwhile, my Boomer parents, who live out in the suburbs, complain that their subdivision has gone completely to Hell. Funny, that.
Do you? Or do you remember when they falsely claimed to mind their own goddamn business?
Well, you sure sound upset, and you’re downvoting both me and the other guy who replied to you, so…
I buy used/refurbished phones a generation or so out-of-date, and recently upgraded from a Pixel 7 to a Pixel 8. Amazon sells “unlocked” phones, but does not distinguish between carrier-unlocked and OEM (bootloader)-unlocked. Whatever phone you get, you’ll want to immediately do the “enabling OEM unlocking” step (enable Developer Options and make sure that “OEM unlocking” exists as an option and isn’t grayed out) before the return period expires.
It took me two tries to get an actually-unlockable phone this time around, and I’ve still got the unsuitable one sitting here on my desk waiting to get packed and shipped back to Amazon.
Also, I’ve been actually screwed by it a year or so ago, when I got a Pixel 7 for my dad, with the idea of preserving the option to install something like GrapheneOS or LineageOS at a later date. When that later date came (after the return window had closed), we discovered that his “unlocked” phone wasn’t actually OEM-unlockable and now he’s stuck on the stock ROM.
I don’t mind it being a rule, but I do mind it being a secret. It needs to be mentioned in the sidebar (probably as an addendum to rule #2).
You’re the one who’s upset about it.
Eh, there were other filaments that worked well enough, I think (carbonized string or something, maybe?). It’s the vacuum that’s the real trick to keeping it from burning out too quick.
Does this community not allow videos? I tried posting a link to it directly yesterday, but Automod removed it instantly.
One of @FauxLiving@lemmy.world’s comments linked to a bug report about it. Turns out the real reason is that Krita uses a plugin architecture that allows additional file types to be supported, so it can’t actually know the complete list of MIME types to put in the .desktop file at application install time.
Krita makes it possible for plugins to extend Krita with additional file format support. Those plugins come with a desktop file that tell the desktop that krita can load those file types. Of course Krita’s main desktop file cannot have the full list of supported file types, because that’s implemented by plugins. Most of those plugins are shipped with Krita, but that is not necessary. People can create extra import/export plugins that still need desktop files so your desktop can know that Krita can load this file format.
I’m not completely convinced that’s a good reason (compared to, say, having each plugin installation modify a single krita.desktop file or something), but I think it manages to upgrade it from “indefensible.”
Why don’t you file the bug report, since you apparently feel so strongly about it? Instead, you’re not even complaining but meta-complaining, which is even worse!
us ugly people
[X] doubt
Yeah, I was gonna say, that sounds more being paid an hourly rate (at sub-livable wage, BTW) and $0 commission.