“I’ve been saving for months to get the Corsair Dominator 64GB CL30 kit,” one beleagured PC builder wrote on Reddit. “It was about $280 when I looked,” said u/RaidriarT, “Fast forward today on PCPartPicker, they want $547 for the same kit? A nearly 100% increase in a couple months?”

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, I was aware RAM prices fluctuate.

        I’ve never been so unfortunate when buying larger RAM, or building a new system with a new DDR version.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They don’t real fluctuate, it’s more oscillating.

          Sometimes it’s “normal” but due to a wide range of issues that can change quickly and stay that way for months because everyone waits till prices go down. So as they go down, people stop waiting,

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nice article but the numbers are a lot lower here in the EU.

    While there is some pricing increase it’s currently more around 50% and not 100%.

    The selected kit is also extremely expensive (350€ was ~300€) - similar kits are available for a lot less (270€ was ~180€) - so I doubt that anyone was buying it in the first place.

    I also think it’s not completely AI related but more likely that this is another RAM price fixing scandal happening right now. Pretty much the same that we see today happend in 2017-2018.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Doesn’t Windows 11 in practice require even more memory than Windows 10 to operate with decent performance?

    Meanwhile my Linux gaming PC seems to actually use less memory than back when it was a Windows machine.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      My work laptop was upgraded to Windows 11 and performance has severely suffered.

      As someone who usually uses 3 monitors (sometimes 4) and does GIS, it’s an issue.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Constant surveillance will do that. Legit “telemetry” wouldn’t be using that much processing power.

      I’m thinking Recall is just Microsoft trying to cut costs on their servers processing all the surveillance, and force users to pay the costs of all the extra electricity and equipment needed.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I just got a 2x64GB 6000 kit before its price skyrocketed by like $130. I saw other kits going up, but had no clue I timed it so well.

    …Also, why does “AI” need so much CPU RAM?

    In actual server deployments, pretty much all inference work is done in VRAM (read: HBM/GDDR); they could get by with almost no system RAM. And honestly most businesses are too dumb to train anything that extensively. ASICs that would use, say, LPDDR are super rare, and stuff like Hybrid/IGP inference is the realm of a few random folks with homelabs… Like me.

    I think ‘AI’ might be an overly broad term for general server buildout.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Same memory production capacity can be allocated to ddr5 or to hbm and openai signed contracts with sk hynix and samsung, the two largest ram manufacturers in the world, and bought a significant percentage of next year’s production.

      DDR5 prices started spiking as that deals impact propagated through the supply chain. I bought a 2x32 6800 Cl30 kit for 195 euro 12 days ago. It was 330 euro 4 days later.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        …Is it that interchangeable?

        TBH I know little of memory fabs and HBM ICs, but I know (say) TSMC can’t just switch from a power-optimized process to a high frequency one at the drop of a hat.

        • tty5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Slightly different part, same process. The bigger bottleneck is packaging - HBM is 3d stacked.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah. Yeah. And its on the fab to do that.

            I always though it’d be cool for CPUs to switch to packaged RAM, too. Samsung apparently tried to do it with Wide I/O for mobile ARM stuff, but it never caught on.

            • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If I’m following what you mean by packaged RAM, Apple does that. It’s fast, but you can’t upgrade it.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                That’s (as I understand it) a misconception.

                Apple attaches their laptop RAM the same way all smartphones do. It’s a wide bus with LPDDR, which makes it an unusual configuration amongst laptops, but it’s technically conventional. And relatively cheap.

                AMD’s Strix Halo chips are the same. Apple could use LPCAMM to make the memory upgradable if they wanted, they just… don’t.

                When we talk ‘packaging’, we’re talking putting chips on advanced substrates with denser wires than one could possibly get on a motherboard (or a ‘mini’ motherboard which is kinda what Apple/smartphone RAM is packaged on), stuff silicon fabs have to do:

                https://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/services/advanced-packaging

                And HBM falls into this bucket. The way its hooked up to the processor is physically different than PC RAM sticks, or Apple’s RAM. This is mostly not done on consumer stuff because its very expensive, and most of TSMC’s advanced packaging production capacity is reserved for server stuff.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They can ALL be run on RAM, theoretically. I bought 128GB so I can run GLM 4.5 with the experts offloaded to CPU, with a custom trellis/K quant mix; but this is a ‘personal use’ tinkerer setup basically no one but hobbyists will touch.

        Qwen Next is good at that because its very low active parameter.

        …But they aren’t actually deployed that way. They’re basically always deployed on cloud GPU boxes that serve dozens/hundreds of people at once, in parallel.

        AFAIK the only major model actually developed for CPU inference is one of the esoteric Gemma releases, aimed at mobile. And the bitnet experiments, which aren’t very big so far.

        (In case it’s not obvious, this is my special interest, and I’m happy to ramble on about how to set up ‘niche gaming rig hybrid models’ for anyone interested).

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I suspect RAM may become increasingly useful with the shift from pure chat LLM to connected agents, MCP, and catching results and data for scaling things like public Internet search and services.

      When I think of database system server software, a lot of performance gains are from keeping used data in RAM. With the expanding of LLM systems and it’s concerns, backing data, connective ness, and need for optimisation, a shift to caching and keeping in RAM seems to suggest itself. It’s already wasteful/big and operates on a lot of data, so it seems plausible that would not be a small cache.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      why does “AI” need so much CPU RAM

      It doesn’t really, though CPU inference is possible/slow at 256+gb. The problem is that they are making HBM (AI) ram instead of ddr4/5.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing is, the “people” propping it up, are massive tech companies with collectively trillions of dollars to burn on this thing that is making their stock prices soar.

      They have no incentive as the primary investors doing the circular buying to stop. The big problem here is the stock market provides awful incentives to everyone.

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This bubble is largely self dependent with all invested parties incentivised to prop it up. Completely different type of situation.

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              No. The housing crash really started to go off when regular people could not pay their bills. These arent regular folks here. These are mega corporations.

                • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Are you like… just not reading the parts where I explain how these are massively different situations?

                  2 things can be bubbles while being massively different in the forces at play.

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Wow I just checked the laptop kit I bought a month ago it is 50% more E: it’s fucking over 100% more now wow it was a 64gb sodimm kit I got for 280AUD and now it is 700AUD fucking hell

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think the bubble bursting will slow AI that much, it’ll just be a round of hot potatoe over, the losers will lose their money and others will come in hoping to be profitable since they can skip a bunch of R&D costs.

      AI is overhyped, but just like the internet after the dotcom bubble burst, it’s not going anywhere.

      Plus I suspect that this time will be a dollar collapse rather than stock market collapse, which would mean prices would go up even more.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It always does. I remember buying my DDR4 RAM 200€, and two months later the same kit was 550€. Some month later it was back at 220€.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Old computer blew up, had to buy a new one. Nice 128gb ddr5. Just mobo, mem, cpu. Cpu is a rhyzen 9 9700

    The memory was well over 40% of the cost, wtf?

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Indeed awful. AFAIU, it is stockpiling HBM memory ahead of next generation “GPUs”, rather than existing product volume. I’m especially disgusted that prices in non-tariff countries are higher than in US. If this were to last, gddr5/6 computer ram would start to make sense. NVIDIA has been behind starving memory supplies for competing platforms (usually AMD) in the past.

    This pricing is both huge inflation, but also huge drop in sales, because we have to wait for it to get sensible.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The non tariff nations getting hit with higher then us prices just shows how little they think of customers. They assume we will pay, they feel entitled to our money. The products have stagnanted, the prices are made up and clearly based on nothing but good old fashion “fuck you pay me” logic. My guess is they are assuming “AI” companies will just buy whatever they make.

      If people keep buying however they will keep doing this. If the market drops out from them (AI bubble bursting at the same time people cut back on buying new systems) then they will likely ask for bailouts (your money again).

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Apple specifically is provably charging countries without tariffs: https://iphone-worldwide.com/

        Have the world subsidize US sales, just because they’re used to paying a little more. Not surprised that other goods would use same strategy.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Its just naked greed, the sooner the world can move away from america and these companies the better.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Genuine question here, for a “normal” computer user, say somebody who :

    • browses the Web
    • listens to music, play videos, etc
    • sometimes plays video games, even 2025 AAAs and already has a GPU relatively recent and midrange, say something from e.g. 2020
    • even codes something of a normal size, let’s say up to Firefox size (which is huge)

    … which task does require more than say 32Go?

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      For normal use like that 16GB is generally just fine. Some games can use enough that you’ll need to close Firefox and other RAM hungry programs though.

      As far as needing more than that, people who do heavy design work or edit videos and that kind of thing generally do. For example 32GB running Fusion in Davinci Resolve can be a bit limiting sometimes with higher resolution or 10 bit footage.

    • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      If by normal you average, they don’t even really need 16gb.
      Creative work can gobble up ram, heavy ass multitasking does as well.
      So it’s more in the digitally productive professional or hobbyist cases where you need such amounts as a person.

      For development high amounts of rams can be useful for all sorts of stuff, it’s not just compiling, but also testing, though 32 is often enough.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      For a normal user, 16G is still enough.

      But for a power user like me, a Dev, with multiple IDE open, multiple browsers, a database manager with a dockerized DB, I’m basically at 96-98% RAM all the time.

      But even then, if you use a local AI, prepare to loose multiple Gigs to it.
      I already used more than 30 Gigs on one LLM (dolphin-mixtral:8x7B for the curious), when I tried testing it, and a more reasonable Mistral:7B still took me like 4Gigs just to run.

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t know but I am constantly hitting the RAM limit with 16Gb of RAM with around 20-30 open tabs and other apps, both on Linux and Windows

  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I bought 16gb of ddr4 for 110eu back in 2018. Welcome back to the DDR wars, with NAND soon to follow.