I saw a video where he “introduced” someone to the FIFA president…
Trump was talking to them and said “you want to meet the president of soccer?” And before they can answer he yells at this jabroni to come over, never looks in his direction again, rambles a little about how impressive he is, and then just wanders off.
“I’m like you know what, I’m going go run for Congress. This is crazy because that’s kind of like discrimination! Like putting you in the back of the bus, or you know, ‘hey, you’re Jewish, go into the bathroom, here’s a ham sandwich.’ It’s like, illegal!”
To clarify, the video is still up on YouTube…
The “discrimination” is he thinks it should have millions of views. And instead it only has 35k.
It’s not just this specific issue:
After Newsom failed to sign the bill in October, he said, “Last year, I vetoed a substantially similar bill, stating that it would limit the ability of health plans to engage in practices that have been shown to ensure appropriate care while limiting unnecessary costs. That is still the case with this bill – despite my call for a more tailored solution. This bill’s expansive coverage mandate, in conjunction with a prohibition on UM, is too far-reaching.”
Newsome is a neoliberal, and he’ll always put profits over people.
Never forget as soon as trump took office again, Newsom had Charlie Kirk and Alex Jones on his podcast sucking up to them and saying Dems need to be more like MAGA.
He didn’t pivot back to anti-maga until maga refused to let him join.
Newsom isn’t fit to be president, but he’s not fit to hold any other political office either. We can’t afford to waste time with these shit birds
does it not then have the potential to water down enough districts to make them swing districts,
That’s how gerrymandering always works…
You want to get every district to where you’d barely win, and jam all the extra people who would vote against you into as few districts as possible that they will definitely win.
The obvious danger is if you gerrymander too much, and a wave shows up, you could potentially lose everything because you no longer have any “safe” districts.
I’ve been saying since the beginning that we’re better off letting them do all this redistricting ASAP, that way we can start the groundwork to win enough of those close districts to take the whole state government
Probably like Disney/Hulu
They’ll try a bundle deal to see if people pay for it, then if not slowly bleed shows from one service to another.
Maybe eventually combine them but they’ll try to keep paying for both as long as possible
I don’t think it was overestimating, more just not realizing that the term “blood libel” isn’t a widely recognized antisemitic concept
Yes…
I overestimated people by thinking if I explained what “blood libel” is, I didnt have to literally say “blood libel is___”
They’re implying the original tweet means threat to kids isn’t from the genocide, and instead it’s the bigoted (and false) stereotype that there are secret Jewish rituals that kill children as blood sacrifices.
When I said “bigoted (and false) stereotype…” You could substitute that for “blood libel”. I just pre-emptively explained it not everyone knew what it was.
And rather than ask questions, a bunch of confused people furrowed their brow and down voted.
But you asked questions, so now you know:
Blood libels often claim that Jews require human blood for the baking of matzos, an unleavened flatbread which is eaten during Passover. Earlier versions of the blood libel accused Jews of ritually re-enacting the crucifixion.[10] The accusations often assert that the blood of Christian children is especially coveted, and historically, blood libel claims have been made in order to account for the otherwise unexplained deaths of children.
but you seem to believe there is something else going on?
…
Whoever Rachel is, she was clearly referencing Gaza and the ongoing genocide.
Eve then (likely intentionally) misunderstood and acted like Rachel was talking about Jewish blood libel. Which is a bigoted belief going back millenia that part of traditional Jewish religious rituals include child sacrifice.
Evan then “dared her to explain why that would be antisemitic”.
My point is that is not as effective as clarifying what was going on and why it’s not…
But I can admit when I’m wrong, clearly I was overestimating people.
lol I’m Jewish buddy
…
And Jewish people support trump too, why couldn’t a self-proffessed Jewish person legitimately believe Nazi propaganda?
You know that was literally going on during the actual Holocaust too, right? Why wouldn’t it be possible in 2025 when multiple high profile people fit that description?
Especially after you just did it in two comments in a row?
Israelis are openly in public killing children as blood sacrifices
killing children with glee with the specific intent to appease god and maintain their divine grant to the land of Israel
That’s straight up Nazi shit you’re repeating, and whatever religion you are doesn’t change that shit.
No, because that’s not a blood sacrifice, and you’re still conflating Judaism with Israel, which is what Netenyahu and the woman from Twitter want to happen…
It’s pretty important, because if you don’t understand it fascist movements will keep abusing your ignorance to help their own propaganda, even tho you clearly disagree with it…
There’s also the huge risk of actual nazis who are intentionally doing what you’re doing and saying they’re commiting blood libel.
So now instead of talking about Israel committing genocide, nobody knows if your an actual Nazi or just spreading Nazi propaganda because you don’t know what the fuck is going on.
Like, does any of this make even a little sense?
You’re acting like that’s a common scenario…
There’s a few small slices of area in a minority of states where you might be legally allowed to pick, but that is not a guarantee there’s more than one option.
To my knowledge most of them are artificial monopolies anyways.
Like, in Perfectville your choice between any available provider is legally protected. However company A and company B made a handshake deal to draw a line down the area and not provide service on one side of the line.
https://competitiveenergy.org/consumer-tools/state-by-state-links/
Very few of those green states are for electricity
And if you just meant:
Non profit = good
Then I’m going to have to explain an entirely different thing…
And I’m not optimistic about our chances to be honest
That’s an insane conclusion to draw!
The people who assumed the person who mentioned blood libel… Was talking about blood libel…
Used such a leap in logic that you can’t even imagine how someone could make it?
Jesus…
Instead, I thought about the ongoing genocide in Gaza and countless children who have been killed.
Which is almost definitely what they were talking about.
Asking someone to explain what they mean is totally valid
And no where near as effective or clear as explaining the situation… Because someone posting in bad faith would let it hang, but some legitimate posters might just not see it till much later, or even at all considering blocks.
Which brings up we don’t know if OPs screenshot was taken immediately after the last reply before they immediately lept to:
they would never explain how. the ambiguity is the point. disgusting hypocrisy
Which makes it sound like they specifically did not understand what was happening.
But I get the feeling this is one of those complicated things no one actually thinks about and just goes off feelings rather than logic. So even if they’re right, they still don’t understand why they’re right.
What?
They’re implying the original tweet means threat to kids isn’t from the genocide, and instead it’s the bigoted (and false) stereotype that there are secret Jewish rituals that kill children as blood sacrifices.
It’s almost certainly an intentional misunderstanding, but if anyone seriously can’t parse that out without someone explaining it, they really need to work on their critical thinking skills.
Bullshit.
You really think companies in America with monoplies would lower prices just because their costs went down?
I wish I lived in an America like that…
Playing Russian roulette with 2 bullets is safer than playing with five…
But if someone called 2 bullet Russian roulette safe, most people could see how stupid that was.
“safely”…
You might not break any bones, but spinal/brain damage is almost guaranteed from an ejection. To the point pilots still die because they’re scared to eject and end up running out of time.
It’s literally a rocket that shoots you straight up, then after you start falling the chute gives another jolt.
20-30% of the time it fractures the pilots spine.
And the article quotes on pilot who said he’s an inch shorter after
I don’t think the suspect will claim it, but…
A law enforcement official said that police have not yet determined a motive, MS NOW reported.
But the suspect has been linked to statements that show support for an anarchist ideology, two people briefed on the arrest told the news outlet.
The cops/feds are 100% going to say it, and already basically are.
Meanwhile, vehicles for model year 2031 will apparently be $925 cheaper than otherwise.
That would be if prices were set on what it costs to produce, and not set to maximize profits…
We see it with EV discounts too, if people will pay 60k for an EV and the government knocks 5k off with a tax credit, they price the EV at 65k and corporations are essentially given tax payer money as a bonus because when the EV rebates go away, they drop the price.
Complete with the performative Carhartt over a suit…
You know the only thing more ridiculous than buying a toilet with a built in camera?
Buying a camera to attach to an existing toilet, that has a monthly device fee that costs more than a fucking toilet does.