• mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    In the top one you will never actually kill an infinite number of people, just approach it linearly. The bottom one will kill an infinite amount of people in finite time.

    Edit: assuming constant speed of the train.

  • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    14 days ago

    Bottom.

    Killing one person for every real number implies there’s a way to count all real numbers one by one. This is a contradiction, because real numbers are uncountable. By principle of explosion, I’m Superman, which means I can stop the train by my super powers. QED

    • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Either that or the humans are so “infinitely packed” that they’re probably already dead squashed into each other.

      Now, if you put infinite people in a chamber, and then compress the chamber and then put an infinite amount of compressed chambers inside a chamber… Will we have Real People?

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    14 days ago

    I pull the lever, if the cart goes over the real numbers it will instantly kill an infinite amount of people and continue killing an infinite amount of people for every moment for the rest of existence.

    If I pull the lever a finite amount of people will die instantly and slowly over time tending twords infinity but due to the linear nature of movement it would never actually reach Infinity even if there are an infinite number of people tied to the track a finite amount is all that could ever die.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        I mean, in that case it’s not really a matter of the trolley killing them, per se. The number will tend towards infinity, until it suddenly spikes to real infinity as people starve.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Probably better than an infinite number of people waiting an infinite amount of time for there impending doom and then also an infinite number of people starving to death.

        you have to remember ℵ^0 in this case is included in ℵ^1 or at least the numerical value is, which is the only information given.

        I guess technically you could value one human soul above the other and technically this is philosophy? So I guess technically you should? but anyway everything that happens on ℵ^0 will also happen on ℵ^1 except more will always happen on ℵ^1 than ℵ^0 so whether there is unintended consequences or not doesn’t really matter. it’s always safer to pick the countable infinities.

        Unless there is something innately good about physically having more people exist no matter there condition. but you would have to ask a philosopher about that one, I’m paid to pull lever’s not philosophize.

  • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    14 days ago

    Bottom has infinite density and will collapse into a black hole killing everyone, and destroying the tram and lever.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Ah, so now Schwarzschild is driving the trolley!
      Or maybe he’s coming to stop the trolley!
      Or maybe Feynman is coming, to renormalize the infinities!
      I really don’t know anymore! Aleph nought, Aleph omega…
      go away, come again some other… perhaps infinite… day.

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    13 days ago

    The first one, because people will die at a slower rate.

    The second one, because the density will cause the trolley to slow down sooner, versus the first one where it will be able to pick up speed again between each person. Also, more time to save people down the rail with my handy rope cutting knife.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 days ago

    I mean, the bottom. The trolley simply would stop, get gunked up by all the guts and the sheer amount of bodies so close together. Checkmate tolley.

  • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    Top case is not the smallest infinite; going for prime number would save a lot of time for a lot of people before they die

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    In the top case has it been arbitrarily decided to include space in between the would-be victims? Or is the top a like number line comparison to the bottom? Because if thats the case it becomes relevant if there is one body for every real number unit of distance. (One body at 0.1 meter, and at 0.01 meter, at 0.001, etc)

    If so then there’s an infinite amount of victims on the first planck length of the bottom track. An infinite number of victims would contain every possible victim. Every single possible person on the first plank length. So on the next planck length would be every possible person again.

    Which would mean that the bottom track is actually choosing a universe of perpetual endless suffering and death for every single possible person. The top track would eventually cause infinite suffering but it would take infinite time to get there. The bottom track starts at infinite suffering and extends infinitely in this manner. Every possible version of every possible person dying, forever.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Imagine being the first one being killed on any of these tracks.

    The probability of that is…?

    Mathematicians tell me, please, because my mind is breaking.