She wrote that she believed the 7-2 Roe v Wade ruling that established those federal abortion rights had “usurped the will of the American people”
Fuck you Amy. If you don’t want an abortion, don’t have one. But stay the fuck out of other people’s personal decisions.
I feel like making the President above the law was usurping the will of the people but you fucking did it anyway
‘People’ as established by Citizens United.
Mitt? Is that you?
“We’ve got binders full of women!”
If so, tell him to go iron his shirt
Even more strangely, she seems to think that stomping on rights is okay, even if most of the country was against that? The will of the people doesn’t matter now, but it did back then?
>“I want Americans to understand the law – and that it’s not just an opinion poll about whether the supreme court thinks something is good or … bad,” Barrett said. “What the court is trying to do is see what the American people have decided.”
Weird. I thought the court’s job was to determine the constitutionality of laws as accurately as possible.
Fuck these spineless twats. Their rulings are worthy of adorning toilet paper.
Calling them spineless suggests that they aren’t part of the attack on democracy.
Complicit is the word theyre searching for. Accomplices would also suffice. Co-conspirator might be giving them a bit more agency than they deserve, though.
Ask that bitch her opinion on women having fewer rights than men in this country, then tell her to sit down and shut up like good breeding stock
Oh, the fucking irony.
Gotta salvage her cred as a hateful conservative hypocrite.
But it is an opinion poll, just one with a small sample size. Having a law degree may be a factor but it’s still opinion-based.
