• SirFasy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 days ago

    All hail The New California Republic. But in all seriousness, it wouldn’t surprise me if the United States has a balkanization event happen in the near future.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 days ago

      The US does not need balkanization.

      We have a single region that has been rebellious and trying to corrupt and destroy the rest of the union since the founding, because they cannot see any governmental or religious structure as legitimate unless it is founded on the principles of racism. This is their own words.

      Lincoln was wrong to readmit the south, we should have let Sherman finish then build a wall around them, while letting any slaves who wanted to escape do so.

      Either that or we need to restart reconstruction today with absolute brutality.

      Before they committed treason against the US alone, this time they allied with Russia to bring us down.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        We have a single region that has been rebellious and trying to corrupt and destroy the rest of the union since the founding

        Isn’t a ton of the current Trump administration rot coming from Silicon Valley?

        Isn’t Silicon Valley in California?

        Lincoln was wrong to readmit the south

        The South was under the Reconstruction plan, complete with Marshall Law and Freedman’s Bureaus and all sorts of additional federal oversight, untilThe Compromise of 1877 gave Rutherford B. Hayes the presidency at the cost of his soul.

        Lincoln didn’t simply readmit the South. He readmitted 9 million enslaved Americans as proper first class citizens. And the initial wave of democratization gave birth to a brief but generally optimistic egalitarian glimpse of a potential future.

        Lincoln’s big mistake was not putting Smedly Butler into his VP seat. Letting the country revert to Andrew Johnson was the big blunder. One that Grant had to spend two terms mopping up.

        But that’s all distant history. The modern fascist presidency is born out of Manhattan Island. The modern Texas/Florida/Ohio Axis of Evil is a product of Yale Business School. Stanford Alumni are fucking us up far more today than some Daughters of the Confederacy could have dreamed.

        This isn’t a North/South problem. It’s a turf war between extractive industry and the professional class.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, because if there’s two things we know silicon valley loves it’s the core issues of the Trump administrafion:

          1. Immigration restrictions

          2. Tariffs

          He was voted in purely about the south, who are not only fascists to the core (if what they consider to be Christo-fascists).

          The thing is: their religion, the southern Baptist church, was founded because they wanted a religion whose core dogma was that slavery was a commandment from God. Hence their basing the Sbc around the curse of Ham justifying slavery. The nazis themselves based the Nuremberg Laws off Jim crow, only without the 1 drop rule.

          This is 100% the south, the restriction of women’s rights, the anti-lgbt, racism, isolation ism.

          They’ve been sold that Russia is their best ally because it is the last True (read: white) Christian Nation fighting against the atheist and Muslim hordes who have infested Europe.

          Silicon valley doesn’t want any of this bullshit, they just want less regulation. This has been a nightmare for them, Europe is starting their own competitors and regulating the cloud providers.

          Silicon valley is smart, this whole thing has the backwards inbred balls-over-brains energy of the south.

          Show me one Manhattan anyone who thinks those tariffs are a good idea.

          Super popular in the south though, finally those rich northerners will have to pay them to do the work, instead of buying stuff from the dirty Mexicans.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            there’s two things we know silicon valley loves it’s the core issues of the Trump administrafion:

            Immigration restrictions
            
            Tariffs
            

            Go pick up a copy of The Network State

      • samuelazers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Reminds me of east and west germany, even still today, one side is poorer than the other, which fostered new radicalism.

        And also where i live, Quebec, poorer rural regions control the elections.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Exactly, the difference is in east Germany after the war they mostly dealt with the nazis.

          In the south they gave them a timeout for 10 years then let them take power again.

          • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Lol no they didn’t deal with the nazis in East Germany. They were pretty quickly persecuted if they came out, but as long as they stayed quiet and clamied they wanted socialism, nothing happened to them.

            And then after the fall of the east block, all of the nazis in eastern Germany no longer had to be quiet and there were also many nazis from the west who helped spread it even further while there was a power vacuum and nothing was done against it.

    • RabbitInTheWoodPile@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t get why Oregon and Washington haven’t jumped on that bandwagon. Imagine the entire west coast working together. All Western seaports.

  • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 days ago

    While I agree with telling Trump to go lick Elon’s balls, states are specifically forbidden from entering into trade agreements with foreign countries by the Constitution. To do this, California would need to be willing to secede from the Union. I’m okay with it.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      And it’s the same for the European union. European states can’t get trade agreements by themselves. So when you read “Italy is ready to talk with trump” is just sucking dick

    • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      California produces 10% of American agricultural needs. If they secede it would be way worse on the economy than these tariffs.

      • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think if California were to secede, Oregon and Washington probably would too. A lot of blue states that border Canada would also probably Jump ship. New York and Michigan might secede too. Those 5 states make up almost 30% of America’s economy and are the center of very lucrative industries like the movie industry, automotive industry, electronics and software industries, the global financial industry. Those 5 states would do just fine without the United States but the United states would be an unimportant backwater without them.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      The best I could tell from the article was that all he was doing was essentially lobbying foriegn countries to tailor their responses so that they hurt california less than other states. I can’t see any law blocking that. From what I could tell he wasn’t even offering anything real in exchange.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    6 days ago

    Unfortunately this runs into constitutional problems. While the spineless subhuman creatures in congress and the supreme court seem to have no problem with Trump and his administration ignoring the constitution I fully expect them to come down hard on any state that does so (at least in cases that go against Trump and his policies).

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      6 days ago

      Don’t have to care about being unconstitutional if you’re not part of the union.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s great in theory but just as unrealistic in practice for California as it always has been for Texas. The single biggest stumbling block for any state to leave the union for any reason is the military. Most of the other problems can be resolved within the borders of the state, but the disposition of existing and theoretical new military hardware, personnel, and bases will always be a sticking point even assuming the federal government and the other states are willing to let them leave.

        Any attempt to leave the US that has any hope of succeeding would be a very long and protracted process that would make Brexit look breakneck in comparison. We’re talking at least a couple decades at a minimum.

        It’s either that or another civil war and that has so many variables I’m not sure anyone has any hope of predicting how that would turn out.

        • lemmus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          6 days ago

          Water is more of an issue than the military. The US relies heavily on California for food so that would be a bargaining chip.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            6 days ago

            Economics in general. California is responsible for a significant chunk of the entire US GDP as well as being one of the primary shipping hubs. My point was more along the lines that these other problems are tractable, you could for instance negotiate trade deals between the rest of the US and California. The military on the other hand is a much tougher problem akin to unscrambling an egg. There’s no obvious way to disentangle California from the greater US military.

            • LordGimp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              6 days ago

              Thankfully CA can fund its.own military once we no longer need to send charity to all the red states with dirt for an economy. Actually, our police forces in the state routinely spend more money than entire foreign militaries. I’m sure with a couple trade deals and strategic defense pacts that California can easily become it’s own country.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            We could do without almonds and wine. The US has more than enough soybeans and corn and wheat and potatoes go around. Nobody is going to starve without California’s agriculture.

            Why are you growing water intensive almonds in what should be a desert anyway?

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        Leaving the union? Yep you guessed it, unconstitutional. Secession would absolutely cause a war

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah, if things were so bad that you were considering secession you might as well cut to the chase and just try to overthrow the US government because they would absolutely go after you hard

          P.s. for any government officials who read the above comment, I’m not advocating for overthrow of your stupid little clubhouse, I’m pointing out why secession is a bad idea. Also, quit wasting my tax dollars looking at stupid shit.

        • LordGimp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Would you rather be complicit with fascism or fight for something better?

          Also, you’re overlooking how much CA funds the rest of the nation. Flyover states do not function without funding from states like CA and TX. Take the west coast from the rest of the US and all that’s left struggles to qualify as third world lmfao

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      They could implement this by just not charging the duties at the ports in California and see who blinks first.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Federal and local government are likely both involved. With the doge cuts, who knows how many boots they actually have on the ground for this these days?

    • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      The Trump administration has demonstrated that the constitution doesn’t really matter. Why keep pretending like this is some sort of sacred immutable text? The spell has been lifted.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Just because Trump and his goons are ignoring it doesn’t mean his cronies in congress and the supreme court won’t still use it to attack anyone they want to.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          But without boots on the ground, enforcement won’t happen. If Trump mobilized military on his own nation, he will well and truly enter the final find out phase of his life. The social contract is wearing thin.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Wouldn’t take the military, he can call on federal marshals, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA, and probably even some of the local police would be willing to become his dogs. He could also in theory deploy one states national guard into a different state although that’s a little shakier legal ground. That’s assuming of course that the local officials would refuse to appear in court or a congressional summons voluntarily. There’s also other ways of exerting pressure like refusing to issue federal funds (although that’s far less effective against Democrat states since they contribute more federal funds than they receive, particularly California).

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              National Guard is military. Using federal law enforcement might be on the table but they’re woefully underequipped to deal with California as a whole.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        yes, without any shared understanding around whether we enforce all laws or just some, law books are just reems of scratchy toilet paper. So are everyones holy books, and any international agreements we have.

        Trump doesnt care about laws and law enforcement has openly hated the public for a long time. Their oaths to serve the law are a vanity that they jettison whenever its convenient.

        And Biden/Harris violating god knows how many genocide and arms laws for zionist $ and then losing the election and support across every voting demographic didnt help matters. I wish I could go back in time to the day Obama picked Biden as his running mate and shake Obama until he picks someone else.

    • joostjakob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It looks like they’re just going to lobby trading partners to please direct (actual) retaliatory sanctions towards products from red states, not their state. In general, I like that idea. But maybe now any excemptions for blue state products should come with a promise to actually fight the incipient fascist government…

    • eric5949@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      They did it during the pandemic, the union is quite literally dissolving before our very eyes.

  • samuelazers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    As i read this, i am remembered of Newsom meeting Trump, after he refused to help with Californian wildfires.

  • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    Would be fun to watch companies from other states bypass the tariffs by buying California products.

    Then of course, Trump will propose tariffs on a State.

  • mesa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    It would be ironic if businesses come back to California because of the tariffs.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s really not legally possible, meaning your either having a revolution, a civil war, or the USA has no ability to stop you as it’s effectively over.

      Unless CA has military bases that would fully side with them, as in all the ones in CA and they would need other states, THEN a war could be possible, but that is very unlikely, currently there’s no military that could beat the US military, so it’s not even worth going over unless the US dissolves.

      • BussyCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        The civil war only happens if the U.S. attacks after a secession, but the state that single most funds the U.S. military is California, if you include Washington and Oregon in the secession you now end up with 19ish% of the countries budget and a sizable percentage of the military bases. With the American civil war there was somewhat defined lines of north vs south but this would be fights inside their own states.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s actually not far off from how things shook out economically in the Civil War. The North had roughly 5x the manpower, firepower, and money of the South. The South was never going to “win” the Civil War, due to that disadvantage. For them, “winning” would have been making the war costly enough to the North that the North gave up.

        • seejur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          And the sentiment of half the East Coast (the one that matters) would be sympathetic to the secessionists

  • deepfuckingdumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is based on a quote “look at new opportunities to expand trade” and a tweet “California is here and ready to talk.” How definitive do those two things sound? How definitive does Newsweek’s title sound?

    Newsweek is a gossip rag.

    • Sprawl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Newsweek is pretty close to a tabloid these days. They are a tad better than the NY Post, but not by much.

  • PurpleSkull@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hope this falls through. Any trade deals that allow the US to circumvent Trumps policies and thus keep his regime going is bad. The big crash needs to happen before people are motivated to fight back. The slow frog boil is what led us here to begin with.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    lol i’m considering a move to Tijuana so i can commute to San Diego… if California can nix the chicken tax then i’m moving.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Trump has got another great idea. A tax of 1.5 million dollars for each ship made in China that will dock at any American port, or 1 million if the ship is not made in china but the shipper fleet has a majority of Chinese ships.

    So, off before they did like California, Panama, Louisiana, new York, those stops will increase the price of shipping by 4.5 million dollars.

    Trump thinks that in this way, in a couple weeks, shipyards will reopen in the states and everyone will buy American ships. Because it takes a couple days to build an oil tanker

    Result:

    They’ll just unload the goods in Canada or Mexico then use trains/trucks. For oil and coal and wheat and other stuff that can’t be easily transported by land without ax existing infrastructure, that’s an additional 20% cost on top of tariffs. Inflation go go go

    • Lanske@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah Trump wants the US to be a great shipbuilder again… but for that you need materials (steel), workers who want to do that sort of job( he’s deporting a lot of people) and skill to manufacture ships…

      He thinks by taxing countries or companies, they will go to the US, but they won’t, and if they do it takes time and a lot of investment…

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    Kudos to California. The neo-Nazi filled MAGA is all about state rights and I hope they tell California to secede.

  • Rene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    EU is already trying to specifically target products from red states with tariffs.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s not going to work in practice. The US economy is even more tangled under the hood than it is internationally.

      Might as well say you’re taking a called shot on someone’s left ventrical, because you don’t want to hurt any other part of their body.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    Thank goodness now we are talking. Time for California to move past the Orange Turd.