• lemmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 days ago

    Water is more of an issue than the military. The US relies heavily on California for food so that would be a bargaining chip.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 days ago

      Economics in general. California is responsible for a significant chunk of the entire US GDP as well as being one of the primary shipping hubs. My point was more along the lines that these other problems are tractable, you could for instance negotiate trade deals between the rest of the US and California. The military on the other hand is a much tougher problem akin to unscrambling an egg. There’s no obvious way to disentangle California from the greater US military.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 days ago

        Thankfully CA can fund its.own military once we no longer need to send charity to all the red states with dirt for an economy. Actually, our police forces in the state routinely spend more money than entire foreign militaries. I’m sure with a couple trade deals and strategic defense pacts that California can easily become it’s own country.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      We could do without almonds and wine. The US has more than enough soybeans and corn and wheat and potatoes go around. Nobody is going to starve without California’s agriculture.

      Why are you growing water intensive almonds in what should be a desert anyway?