• orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    8 days ago

    Unfortunately this runs into constitutional problems. While the spineless subhuman creatures in congress and the supreme court seem to have no problem with Trump and his administration ignoring the constitution I fully expect them to come down hard on any state that does so (at least in cases that go against Trump and his policies).

    • joostjakob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      It looks like they’re just going to lobby trading partners to please direct (actual) retaliatory sanctions towards products from red states, not their state. In general, I like that idea. But maybe now any excemptions for blue state products should come with a promise to actually fight the incipient fascist government…

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      8 days ago

      Don’t have to care about being unconstitutional if you’re not part of the union.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s great in theory but just as unrealistic in practice for California as it always has been for Texas. The single biggest stumbling block for any state to leave the union for any reason is the military. Most of the other problems can be resolved within the borders of the state, but the disposition of existing and theoretical new military hardware, personnel, and bases will always be a sticking point even assuming the federal government and the other states are willing to let them leave.

        Any attempt to leave the US that has any hope of succeeding would be a very long and protracted process that would make Brexit look breakneck in comparison. We’re talking at least a couple decades at a minimum.

        It’s either that or another civil war and that has so many variables I’m not sure anyone has any hope of predicting how that would turn out.

        • lemmus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          8 days ago

          Water is more of an issue than the military. The US relies heavily on California for food so that would be a bargaining chip.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            8 days ago

            Economics in general. California is responsible for a significant chunk of the entire US GDP as well as being one of the primary shipping hubs. My point was more along the lines that these other problems are tractable, you could for instance negotiate trade deals between the rest of the US and California. The military on the other hand is a much tougher problem akin to unscrambling an egg. There’s no obvious way to disentangle California from the greater US military.

            • LordGimp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              7 days ago

              Thankfully CA can fund its.own military once we no longer need to send charity to all the red states with dirt for an economy. Actually, our police forces in the state routinely spend more money than entire foreign militaries. I’m sure with a couple trade deals and strategic defense pacts that California can easily become it’s own country.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            We could do without almonds and wine. The US has more than enough soybeans and corn and wheat and potatoes go around. Nobody is going to starve without California’s agriculture.

            Why are you growing water intensive almonds in what should be a desert anyway?

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        Leaving the union? Yep you guessed it, unconstitutional. Secession would absolutely cause a war

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, if things were so bad that you were considering secession you might as well cut to the chase and just try to overthrow the US government because they would absolutely go after you hard

          P.s. for any government officials who read the above comment, I’m not advocating for overthrow of your stupid little clubhouse, I’m pointing out why secession is a bad idea. Also, quit wasting my tax dollars looking at stupid shit.

        • LordGimp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Would you rather be complicit with fascism or fight for something better?

          Also, you’re overlooking how much CA funds the rest of the nation. Flyover states do not function without funding from states like CA and TX. Take the west coast from the rest of the US and all that’s left struggles to qualify as third world lmfao

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      They could implement this by just not charging the duties at the ports in California and see who blinks first.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          Federal and local government are likely both involved. With the doge cuts, who knows how many boots they actually have on the ground for this these days?

    • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      The Trump administration has demonstrated that the constitution doesn’t really matter. Why keep pretending like this is some sort of sacred immutable text? The spell has been lifted.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Just because Trump and his goons are ignoring it doesn’t mean his cronies in congress and the supreme court won’t still use it to attack anyone they want to.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          But without boots on the ground, enforcement won’t happen. If Trump mobilized military on his own nation, he will well and truly enter the final find out phase of his life. The social contract is wearing thin.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Wouldn’t take the military, he can call on federal marshals, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA, and probably even some of the local police would be willing to become his dogs. He could also in theory deploy one states national guard into a different state although that’s a little shakier legal ground. That’s assuming of course that the local officials would refuse to appear in court or a congressional summons voluntarily. There’s also other ways of exerting pressure like refusing to issue federal funds (although that’s far less effective against Democrat states since they contribute more federal funds than they receive, particularly California).

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              National Guard is military. Using federal law enforcement might be on the table but they’re woefully underequipped to deal with California as a whole.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        yes, without any shared understanding around whether we enforce all laws or just some, law books are just reems of scratchy toilet paper. So are everyones holy books, and any international agreements we have.

        Trump doesnt care about laws and law enforcement has openly hated the public for a long time. Their oaths to serve the law are a vanity that they jettison whenever its convenient.

        And Biden/Harris violating god knows how many genocide and arms laws for zionist $ and then losing the election and support across every voting demographic didnt help matters. I wish I could go back in time to the day Obama picked Biden as his running mate and shake Obama until he picks someone else.

    • eric5949@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      They did it during the pandemic, the union is quite literally dissolving before our very eyes.