• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      To keep it real for a moment, Jucika should be fired immediately for this. I’ve seen or had to deal with traumatic head injury patients getting cords wrapped around them, falling out of bed, wandering off, etc because of people like her in this comic. It is unacceptable. You take a 12 or 14 hour shift to watch a patient: you STAY AWAKE and WATCH THE PATIENT.

      • tetris11@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        similarly, if you ride shotgun with a driver who has to stay awake, then YOU STAY AWAKE WITH THEM AND TALK TO THEM

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        A possible interpretation if this is the only Jucika comic you’ve read.

        The pattern is: First frame: Man sees Jucika. Last frame: Man does incredibly generous thing for Jucika. And it’s always a man and it always happens almost instantly.

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Many that ive seen actually involve men annoying her or her somehow being inconvenienced by men. Ive seen a bunch that are about her interacting with other women, often involving men who are being annoying or creepy. The kind of interaction shown in this strip seems to be kind of rare by comparison.

          I also fail to see your outrage over it. Who says he did it because he thinks shes hot? He just seemed to feel badly for her cause she was tired at work and wanted to let her rest. Any inference over his intentions is just that, your own inference.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Pretty privilege undoubtedly exists, and it’s often invisible to the pereson who is providing it, though it is painfully obvious to anyone who has lived in states of being pretty and not pretty at varying times of their lives. Jucika fans seem to be particularly blind to it and that’s really what my outrage is about.

        • willprove@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 day ago

          We respect the elegance Jucika and do anything to please her every whim and comfort without expecting a goddang thing in return

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I’m not at all surprised at the level of disconnect there is among Jucika fans. I should probably stop reading and commenting on these like everyone else with a lick of human understanding would.

            I’m reminding of a comment on a video of Anne Margaret’s Bye Bye Birdie. Something along the lines of, “This is when woman had class and didn’t whore themselves out,” weirdly unaware that his own childhood lust for Anne Margaret was likely triggered by her shaking her large boobs inside her sweater.

            Edit: Here she is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsQabalLI0w It’s hella fun to watch and she’s a great performer, but obviously she is selling some sexuality.

            • Zensate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              What part of this is sexual to you?

              The ‘large boobs’ thing isn’t gonna fly either

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              Wtf are you talking about? She shook her (perfectly average-sized) boobs for like a split second, once, toward the end of that video.

              I get that people were more prudish in those days, but characterizing that video as a woman “shaking her large boobs inside her sweater” sounds like the talk of someone who thinks literally everything a woman does is sexual. We can’t even shimmy once in a 3-minute performance without someone thinking we’re “whoring ourselves.”

              • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I’m not saying Ann Margaret is whoring herself out any more or less than anyone else, just that sexuality is often part of performance, and those standards change over time. What I object is to people pretending like sexuality isn’t a factor in appeal, especially when these boomers are disparaging younger performers.

        • hakase@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, I usually enjoy Jucika but there’s no denying that the majority of strips are essentially “Pussy Pass: The Comic”.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      While the clear joke in a lot of Jucika comics is men doing irrational or silly things because Jucika’s attractive, describing it the way you do does it a disservice. It’s supposed to be playful, not puerile. That doesn’t mean you have to like it, but personally I find it silly and kind of annoying when people mischaracterise stuff they dislike - either their dislike is causing them to describe it badly, or their misunderstanding of it is causing them to dislike it, and neither is good :(

    • tacosanonymous@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not gonna gaslight you and say that isn’t a lot of the Jucika comics. I am gonna say that’s not all of them. A few of them are witty or wholesome.