• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    On the same day this came out, University of Florida scientists announced a possible new treatment for cancer - not a type of cancer, ALL cancers. It works by stimulating the immune system to kill the tumor, and it’s based on a treatment for glioblastoma that had highly successful human trials last year. Hard to believe these same two developments both came out of the nutbin of Florida.

    • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      You got me for a second there.

      I thought you would make a “the onion” joke of florida plan’s to send cancer patient to work the fields as a “treatment” for cancer.

      I’m surprised (and kinda of relieved?) that your comment is actually about a new scientific discovery.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Oh yeah it’s very exciting. In 2024 a vaccine that targeted glioblastoma, an especially nasty brain cancer with an almost zero survival rate. The vaccine mimics certain aspects of tumor cells, triggering a fast, vigorous immune response that attacks the actual tumor. Encouraged by the results, they’ve somehow generalized the vaccine over the past year to stimulate an immune response to cancer cells in general. Immunological therapy is totally different from chemo or radiation, and a generalized approach is vastly different from what the whole field has been doing for decades. Very promising.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      That happens like all the time, but they never work (yet!). Cancer is so agressive, dividing so fast, and thus adapting through mutations that nothing really works fully.

      But maybe it will kill some of them, and let’s not stop trying! Fuck cancer.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        It’s mRNA based, if I recall.

        This makes it, essentially, endlessly flexible. We can now take a sample, sequence it, find the mutations, simulate what the protein looks like when folded, generate* the correct complimentary protein for that target and write the actual amino acid sequence directly into mRNA and give it to the patient.

        This is currently incredibly expensive because it’s being done manually by labs full of PhDs. But every part of this process is being rapidly improved and made cheaper.

        mRNA based medicines have amazing promise. For example they had the COVID vaccine designed less than 12 hours after sequencing the virus.

        *using a diffusion model, like AI image generators but they produce amino acid sequences that generate arbitrarily shaped proteins

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          mRNA based stuff is indeed incredible, no more randomly just trying things out, it’s really the future IMO.

          But for cancer it will just be a tool in the toolbox , I mean you gotta get those samples and cancer change maybe a thousand times a minute, which strain is the “bad” one? Etc. etc. etc.

          One theoretical way to stop cancer altogether would be to remove the possibility for telomere lengthening (remove the production of telomerase) and “manually” allow the growth of only stem cell from time to time.

          But that’s a long time from now if ever it can be done.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Oh yeah, cancer is incredibility complex. I’m not remotely qualified to predict how this will be used.

            I’m on the tech side of things and the ability to read and write arbitrary amino acid sequences along with machine learning models trained to predict (ex: AlphaFold) and generate (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45051-2) protein structures is absolutely mindblowing.

            It’s like we’ve been working on computers by striking flint at their CPU and listening to the traces vibrate in order to interpret the output and now someone has figured out how to plug in a keyboard and monitor.

            We’re barely scratching the surface with these techniques and we’ve found multiple ways to make an AIDS vaccine and we’re discovering new ways to beat cancer. The rapid development of the COVID vaccine, thanks to mRNA, likely saved millions or tens of millions of people and prevented a global depression.

            It’s such an incredible time for human advancement, it’s a shame we’re all drowning in social media fueled toxicity and people don’t see it.

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Yeah totally agree!

              I sometimes feel like I learned a lifetime of things, just to get it all thrown under the bus in the last 5-10 years, biological science is advancing so fast right now it’s mind blowing.

              mRNA also might treat allergies and take on parts of the deadliest disease too, aging.

              Interesting times!

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean, that’s one way to look at it.

      The more accurate way to look at is that the American right hates migrants and people of color so much that they would force their children into hard labor just to make sure nobody who sounds or looks different receives any kind of benefit.

      • Poojabber@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not their children… other peoples children. You know… the poors… those kids can work long hours for low pay and since they are poor, they will be stupid enough to be happy about it. The people voting for this do not need to worry about it affecting their kids… or think they dont…

      • stringere@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        the American right hates migrants and people of color so much that they would force their other people’s children

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      This country has, throughout its entire history, relied heavily on immigrants to make up the shortfalls in its labor force. A full stoppage of immigration is going to collapse the United States economy. Sooner than later.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Farms have historically used their children as free labor back when they were mostly family owned. That’s why most schools here have a three month summer break. Now they want the factory farms to have that same perk, just with other people’s children.

  • regdog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Newsweek states on their own website that this article is unfairly leaning left. What a strange editorial decision.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s I think a dollop on the brassero program that details a past program where they’d ship high schoolers to farms for the summer in an attempt to reduce migratory workers. The program failed immediately. Conservatives are insane in the literal definition of the word.

    • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I haven’t listened to the dollop in a minute but I’m pretty sure that same episode is literally about the first wave of illegal immigration propaganda in the US, talks about how the borders changed in the 1930s.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    7 days ago

    Republican state Senator Jay Collins, the bill’s sponsor, said the measure was about parental rights: “We should let them say what’s best for their kids at 16- to 17-year-olds, that’s what we’re saying by this.”

    Anyone who puts forth a measure aimed at “parental rights”, it’s always something that’s aimed at parents’ right to treat their children like property

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      It would also have scrapped required 30-minute meal breaks

      It’s a parent’s right to make sure their child works an 8 hour shift with no breaks! Breaks are socialism!

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          So let’s make the jobs nobody wants to do even worse while we deport the few remaining people willing to do them.

          Then try and get notoriously hard working and focused teenagers to do it.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      Every one of these is always “Parent’s Rights Act” and the text is like “murdering your gay/trans 10-year-old is now totally legal”.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 days ago

        “My kids are in need of a proper traditional upbringing, which means locking them in a box and tenderizing them like veal, until they’re old enough to be sold at auction.”

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    lol do American politicians seriously try to frame child labor laws as taking away parents rights?

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      When I was a kid, my mom was outraged that somebody made the statement, “children aren’t their parent’s property.”
      So, yeah

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      part of the conservative ideology is that children are property and should be molested, not heard.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      In ancent rome there was a law,that went something like “you cannot sell your son into slavery a third time”. Americans would see that as a violation of parental rights

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Third? The fuck did someone do to cause that?! Was there some dude who sold his son into slavery and then said son got out of slavery at least three times so the Romans had to pass a law to keep that from happening again? Why do I get the feeling Crassus was involved.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Of course! Especially those from the party that wants crops to be picked, but doesn’t want anyone who would actually do it to exist or survive in our country. And because the term “child labor” in general is unpalatable to most people. For good reason…

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Currently every politician making a name for themselves will frame anything they can in any way they can. Words have little meaning lately so you just say whatever the fuck you want and worry about the angle later.

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Actually surprising that the Republicans didn’t just push it through as they have a majority, but one can be happy about every news story like that