• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    4 months ago

    Roosevelt did great things for Americans while still being capitalist. The needle can be moved left without violent revolution.

    “Both sides bad” is weak sauce.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      4 months ago

      Quick reminder that there were other things going on in the 20s and 30s. You know, the height of socialism in the West, a strong labor movement willing to burn down factories, stuff like that. The New Deal didn’t come because leftists played nice.

    • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, the new deal only came to be after violent protests, and was largely a betrayal of labor groups because it gave a much watered down version of what was actually demanded, all while Roosevelt broke the strike he promised to support while campaigning. Read “Labor’s Giant Step Forward” by Art Preis if you want a more detailed accpunt

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      In addition to the points raised by some of the other comments I’d remind you of one uncomfortable truth. The business plot was attempted fascist takeover of America. That was thankfully put down because remarkably there was one honorable ex-marine they tried to involve the plot. That’s Smedley Butler. In the wake of that that attempted fascist coup basically nobody was punished. In large part because Roosevelt told them as long as they kept their mouth shut and didn’t block the New Deal he wouldn’t go after them. That’s basically the only reason it got through. Truncated as it was even then. Because most of the richest and most powerful people in the country we’re looking down the barrel of a gun otherwise.

    • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      Have fun wasting your time doing this. If they only fucked over Burnie once I might agree with you.

      • Korne127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well, they will still try. They won’t give it up. But it’s not possible to win it against them, like the Tea Party won against less extreme establishment Republicans

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you had to go back almost a hundred years to find any kind of example, I’m just going to gesture broadly at the next hundred years and rest my case.

    • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Both sides are functionally the same when it comes to the world. There’s barely a difference between domestic policy between the two American parties. One uses sweet nothing’s to try assuage your fears and the other uses Force and strongman techniques.

      Yeah the FDR Reformation came directly from FDR and we pushed through at his behest. According to my understanding of these politics at a time if The president hadn’t been FDR we would not have gotten those Reformations. Besides they hardly matter nowadays when they’re practically entirely Stripped Away. The last surviving one is social security and they’re pretty gung-ho about getting rid of that too.

        • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Couldn’t be bothered to read. Ad hominem attack. Excellent representation of the American voter.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            People who type the words “both sides” and then post don’t deserve to have their comments read.

            • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              People who are unable to read are one of the reason the United States is in the toilet.

              People who use fallacies so they don’t have to engage with the objective facts of an argument they’re not able to impeach are another reason the world is falling to facism

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      can it be done again without another series of protests and pain the current era of capitalism?

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      With unintelligent comments like yours and all the discussions happening below meme threads, conflicts and violence is where we are heading to. I encourage you to learn more about the things you are talking about.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Both sides are varying degrees of the same ideology, give all the money to the economic elite so they bribe both parties into maintaining that policy above all other considerations.

      One side shrugs and calls it free market forces(D) as you suffer under that policy goal, the other points and laughs at you and says you deserve it®. That is the extent of our “freedom” under American democracy.

      • svtdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        One side appoints Justices that voted against Citizens United and one appoints Justices that voted for it. That’s a huge distinction.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep.

      All the keyboard warriors talking about revolution need to either pick up and gun and do it or get off their asses and help primary bad Dems to send a message and start the reformation process.

      No one who made it out of high school should be saying “both sides” because it’s a profoundly stupid and unproductive thing to say. Did we have masked squads disappearing people before January? Did our allies all hate us? Were we threatening fucking Canada? Were we paying tariff taxes?

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    4 months ago

    What is the point of this meme? I feel like the only thing this can produce is people to not try to reform and improve the democratic party and take it over (like the tea party took over the republicans). Kind of like these “give up climate change it can’t be stopped” posts that just benefits the big fossil fuels companies

    • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s the point, I’ve noticed a lot of the loudest, most active posters on Lemmy ultimately want one thing, which is progressives not to vote. Weird how that’s what the conservatives have relied on for every presidential victory they’ve achieved in the past half century or more.

      • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 months ago

        Votes are earned not freely given. Your vote is your voice. Definitely vote at the local and state levels where your voice can be the loudest.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          And if you only want to give half a vote, give it to Trump and JD.

          (Because not voting is very similar to half a vote for the other guy.)

          • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            (Because not voting is very similar to half a vote for the other guy.)

            Not voting wasn’t a vote for Trump. Did not voting for Trump mean a vote for Harris?

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              4 months ago

              Did not voting for Trump mean a vote for Harris?

              It would mean you wouldn’t have minded a Harris victory. The comment even explicitly said “half a vote” to reflect this.

              This commentary is frequently also accompanied with blaming Harris voters for things that Trump is doing…

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What is the point of this meme?

      These memes communicate to Democrats and their supporters that we’re sick and tired of their mask-off conservative rule when they promise us the world and do nothing once elected. You want praise? You want votes? Then do something.

      Since, you know, not voting for them apparently isn’t enough to inspire meaningful change. Just once in my life I want to see Democrats fight harder for the working class and poor as they do against socialists and third parties.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You want praise? You want votes? Then do something.

        Time for you to educate yourself. Look up Dem’s economic stats compared to Republicans. Look up the Dem’s voting history.

        They aren’t doing EVERYTHING, but they do a lot more than the other viable option.

        If you want them to do more, then stop wasting your time doing what you’re doing and start focusing on getting people to primary Dems who aren’t doing what we want, because that’s how you get Democrat party reform.

        This meme is utter trash and only serves to fracture liberals and prevent the reform I just described.

        Just once I want liberals to come together and primary bad Dems to send a message instead of fucking whining and not voting or voting 3rd party so fascists can take over.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Just once I want liberals to come together and primary bad Dems

          They did.

          That bad candidate was Joe Biden.

          The Democratic Party just ignored it. Democratic primaries are a worthless exercise.

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        China produces ~65% of global smartphones. At worst US companies simply re-brand products from overseas OEMs, at best they’re using Chinese produced semiconductors and components to create original products.

        The rest of the consumer electronics market is pretty similar. If you believe modern China is communist then they are “doom-scrolling on their communist-produced smartphones” through a communist produced network infrastructure which you are, most likely, reading through a communist-produced screen.

        I would argue however that modern China largely split the difference between the USSR, which you are McCarthy-ing about, and the modern Russian Federation, which explicitly reformed into a liberal democracy with a capitalist market economy.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      You are correct. The OP has an agenda and that agenda is to fracture liberals.

      The answer is not to give up. The answer is not to vote for a worthless 3rd party with zero chance of winning. The answer is to reform the Democrat party and history has shown us, repeatedly, that it is completely possible. And it literally just happened with the Republican party in the last 2 decades.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is a right-wing troll talking point. Don’t listen to it.

    Go to the Democratic primaries and move the party left. And then, no matter who gets the nomination, vote Dem in the general election. This is exactly what the nazis did to move the GOP to the right and it worked great for them, and it’s something we can emulate.

    • iridebikes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, not listening to this defeatist garbage. The Democratic party has been changed before. It will be changed again. The party is not defined by some monolithic ideology. We need massive electoral reform in the US to ensure elections are actually fair. First past the post is problematic. House and Senate functions are problematic. We need a solution to the two party problem, but until then, our vehicle is the Democratic party. Best to make it do what we want it to rather than just give up because “they’re corporatists”.

      • Abigaelle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, not listening to this defeatist garbage.

        Defeatism is thinking the only option you have is playing by the rules the bourgeoisie instated, not “stop believing in a corrupt party”

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      no matter who gets the nomination, vote Dem in the general election

      Its never worked before, but lets just try that again.

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    What the fuck are you talking about I’ve heard it a million fucking times already. Its all anti-Harris lefties talk about.

    Having fun with the fascism we’ve got instead? Thanks for that BTW. Real good. Really makes me motivated to fight for my rights when my follow lefties keep empowering fascists through inaction in the most simplistic and basic fucking democratic function of going to a polling place and voting once every 4 years for the lib that’ll beat the fascist.

    I really wanna go fight ICE in hand to hand combat and get shot in the fucking face knowing this probably could have been prevented.

    Also if you are going to complain that I’m not bagging on the centrist/liberal dems for losing because they refused to budge left: I fucking hate them too, you can both suck shit directly out of my asshole.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Progressives do vote for centrists. Centrists do not return the favor and vote for progressives. Harris didn’t lose because the left staying home; the left held their nose and voted for her, even though that loyalty is a one-way street. She lost because she was such a dog shit candidate that she couldn’t drive enough people who aren’t highly politically engaged to the polls. The only reason she lost the election was because of her own poor decisions. Stop blaming the left for the failures of centrist democrats.

      • Redfugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        She lost because Dems stayed home, low turnout in key Democratic areas. No matter how bad you think she was as a candidate you’re not going to convince me that she was worse than the dog shit candidate that won, and that’s on the people that stayed home.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          She was objectively worse. Trump represented his base. Kamala didn’t. Trump is objectively the better politician. He gave his base exactly what they wanted. She refused to, preferring to pander to wealthy conservatives instead. You can argue she had better policies, but you cannot argue that she wasn’t an absolute dogshit candidate. She was simply bad at being a politician and had no business being at the top of the ticket.

          You need to separate quality of policies from quality of candidate. You’ll never make any progress as long as you keep conflating the two.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            She was objectively worse.

            Today I learned a prosecutor with a doctorate in law who has committed no crimes and ran a campaign primarily focused on unity and inclusion is objectively worse than a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who illegally attempted to overturn an election after inciting an insurrection and ran a campaign based on hate and fear.

            She refused to, preferring to pander to wealthy conservatives instead.

            She refused to lie through her fucking teeth to her base or make enemies of our fellow Americans to win an election. And she gave a podium to a prominent conservative that spoke out against Trump. Maybe not a great move, but not some betrayal.

            She also ran with virtually no preparation out of necessity.

            We can keep blaming Harris or we can start blaming stupid fucking Americans that jeopardized our democracy because she wasn’t the best candidate ever. Like, what kind of broken fucking brain thinks “well, she’s not that great, so let me gamble with a felon rapist traitor instead”?

            • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Reading comprehension. You’re confusing policies for candidate quality. Trump was a good politician with shitty policies. Kamala was a dog shit politician with ok policies.

              It’s pointless to blame the electorate because they’re not going anywhere. Or are you more of a Zionist type, who would prefer just killing the electorate if they don’t vote your way?

      • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m blaming anyone who choose not to vote for her who were center or left of center. Anyone. As stated: if you are to my right or to my left and you explicitly choose not to vote for Harris and could have, you can suck shit.

        If you discouraged people from voting for her: you can suck shit. If you constantly criticized her and barely talked about how fucking dangerous Trump is in general political discourse: you can suck shit.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Any American that isn’t braindead stupid knew what was on the line this election.

        And any American that knew what was on the line voted for Harris.

        You can blame Democrats all day, and they do shoulder some blame, but the majority of the blame falls on stupid fucking Americans that couldn’t rub some brain cells together, not a party that isn’t great at messaging.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          And what do you hope to accomplish by blaming the electorate? They’re not going anywhere. You can bitch about the voters all you want. But ultimately, if you fail to appeal to them, that just means you’re a bad politician. Complaining about voters is like complaining about the weather.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, there are a lot of stupid fucking idiots out there, including on Lemmy, that are going to do the same stupid fucking thing they did last time and either not vote or vote for a 3rd party candidate that cannot, under any circumstance, win. And we’ll descend even further into fascism.

      Lot of stupids. But as I scroll down these comments, the majority are calling this meme out for the stupid fucking bullshit that it is. So I still have a little hope. I’m sure that’ll get destroyed in the near future.

  • BillDaCatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    While I mostly agree with this, I have one significant hurdle I am unable to overcome. What other choice do I have?

    I can’t stand most Democrats. They suck! But they are a far cry better than voting Republican. And voting for a third party feels like wasting my vote.

    If there was a third party candidate that focused on climate change and social issues and had even the slightest chance of winning, I would vote for them in a second. Until then, I am stuck voting for the lesser of two evils.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      But they are a far cry better than voting Republican. And voting for a third party feels like wasting my vote.

      You just answered your own question.

      Democrats are FAR, FAR, FAR better than Republicans. We know this because the data shows they are better for our economy. We know this because their voting record shows that they regularly vote in favor of the middle and lower classes. We know this because they never attempted to violently overturn an election or send masked squads into our towns to abduct people off the street.

      No 3rd party is viable or will be viable anytime in the near future. It will take YEARS and YEARS for a 3rd party to start winning local/state elections and getting reps in the House and Senate. And that’s IF a 3rd party actually starts putting in the work, which none are doing.

      So if you want to be smart, and actually help protect our democracy, then you should vote Democrat in national elections and maybe vote 3rd party in local elections to help them gain some traction and see if they can do anything with it.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        We know this because the data shows they are better for our economy

        We know this because the data shows they are better for our economy rich people’s money.

        FTFY.

        They’re definitely not good for “our” money, meaning the 99% that works for a living, unless you’re of the opinion that outright ignoring food and rent becoming cost-prohibitive is somehow good for “our” money.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          We know this because the data shows they are better for our economy rich people’s money.

          Time for you to go back to high school econ. The healthier our economy, the more everyone benefits.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    They had their chance in 2016 to include Bernie Sanders, Democrats blew their chance by ditching Bernie.

    • theonetruedroid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bernie is too liberal for all those big donors who pump up the Democrats via Super PACs. He might get in the way of them profiting off the American people. Bernie would have been the best choice for this country at beating back the MAGA movement before it became what we have now.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Too liberal” for all the people who didn’t vote for him. Because he’s not as popular in real life as he is on the internet.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Downvotes from the people who don’t know Bernie lost in both the 2016 and 2020 primaries because not enough people voted for him.

          You are correct. As much as I like the guy, he is not as popular in reality as he is on the internet. But you can sure hurt a lot of feelings by pointing out that reality on the internet.

          • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I hold nothing against Bernie. He does have real integrity.

            The problem I have is the portion of his supporters that are essentially left-wing Trumpers. They don’t care about the truth. They don’t care about what’s best for the country. They make lies about electoral cheating.

            The only difference is that Trump is a fucking scumbag and Bernie has integrity. I say that because each time he lost in the primaries, he publicly endorsed the Democratic candidate. Because he’s not a fucking moron and knew how destructive Trump presidencies would be. I find it interesting that THIS is the one issue Bernie Bros disagree on with Bernie. All of a sudden, he should NOT be listened to? He has also never claimed to have been cheated.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bernie Sanders lost the primaries. This bullshit has to stop.

      Imagine being so immature that you throw a decade-long temper tantrum allowing a FELON PEDOPHILE to be president because you didn’t get your way once.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        The DNC are the ones who lost to the felon pedophile. Don’t let them blame the left in order to avoid taking accountability.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, Bernie was cheated out of winning the primaries by collusion between Hillary and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

        Never underestimate the ability of Democrats to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. They will find a way.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Welcome to America. There are A LOT of those immature fools throwing decade-long temper tantrums.

        These same fools simply don’t grasp that the guy lost primaries, both times, because not enough people were voting for him.

        Children.

  • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “We’d rather have a convicted felon pedophile be president because the Democrats don’t want to dismantle capitalism entirely and replace with… well we don’t know what with”.

    • Absolute fucking dumbasses.
    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, people generally want their politicians to help them.

      And wealth inequality is the single biggest issue in human society.

      We are at a point where if we want to help regular people, we need that to come at the expense of the rich.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You’re arguing against your own masturbatory fantasy.

      The left came out and voted for Harris. They held their nose and voted for the shit pile centrist, as they always do. We’ve seen with Mamdani that this loyalty is a one way street. Progressives hold their nose and vote for centrists, but centrists do not return the favor.

      Harris lost because she couldn’t drive enough politically unaligned, low-engagement voters to the polls. The average person who isn’t that involved in politics simply didn’t think it was credible that Harris would improve their lives in any way.

      Aside from a few performative tankies, the message I kept reading on lemmy was “I’m going to vote for Harris, but her dog shit policies are going to cost her the election.” And those progressive voices were ignored. Their desperate warnings were drowned out by people like yourself, sticking their fingers in their ears and going, “BLAH BLAH BLAH CAN’T HEAR YOU, VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO! IT’S YOUR FAULT IF THE FASCISTS WIN, I HOLD NO RESPONSIBILITY HERE!”

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Harris lost because she couldn’t drive enough politically unaligned, low-engagement voters to the polls.

        If those low engagement voters couldn’t make it to the polls to protect our democracy and prevent a felon rapist traitor from becoming President, then the problem lies primarily with those fucking fools, not Kamala Harris.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why do you expect anyone to care about democracy. Only the wealthiest 10% of the population lives in a democracy. 90% of the population has zero actual democratic power. You don’t live in a democracy.

          And Kamala, a candidate who was annointed, not elected, could credibly run on a platform of democracy.

        • Abigaelle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          The inside strategy is far simpler

          I love how it’s the fault of the voters and not the fault of the democrats for being shit, centrists, and genocide enjoyers

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not true. It can be reformed the same way the republican party was deformed. By gutting it from the inside out and replacing all the dead weight.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      the dead weight is… most of it though. A lot of people just joined because it was the only alternative to republicans. And now its pretty much dead.

  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s no way to win political power in the United States without the Democratic Party or the Republican Party.

    Socialists and progressives will always have an easier time infiltrating the neoliberal Democratic Party over the fascist Republican Party.

    The longer the fascists are in power the harder it will be remove them from power because they will change the rules to maintain power.

    The optimal strategy remains to vote for neoliberals when the alternative is fascists because that is how to create time for socialists and progressives to primary neoliberals in the Democratic Party and win general elections.

    This meme is a continuation of the accelerationism we saw during the 2024 election. It supports the fascist cause by attempting to sabotage leftist’s best strategy and thus is pro-fascist. The user is prone to self-sabotage as they publicly admitted to not voting for Harris in 2024.

    If a fascist drinks at your bar and you don’t throw them out it’s a fascist bar. If a fascist meme ends up in your community and you don’t throw it your a fascist community.

    I am reporting this meme. And you all should too. I’m sick of self-described leftists backstabing me and every other minority group they pretend to care about because they’re mad about the 2016 election. I’m a trans, atheist, Jew. I’m close enough to the death camps for my liking thanks. You don’t have to like the Democrats, I don’t, but we do need to vote for them.

    I refuse to go quietly. I refuse to tolerate memes that shrug at my right to exist and throw fuel to the fire in the hopes that the fascists kill everyone faster. That’s not a real political position. It’s black pilled bullshit and it can fuck off.

    Hope that helps people stop tolerating this bullshit going forward.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Thank you for putting that out there. I still cannot see making any other choice when it came time to vote. The too-close death camps you refer to were a very predictable consequence of this administration. I’m just a straight white guy but I really prefer to not add death camps to the world, or to disappear peaceful productive people from their communities, or to significantly harm the lives of millions of young, old, poor, or disabled people. That includes the ones starving overseas because of recent changes.

      “But genocide!” we expect to hear in response. And if any dear readers are already thinking that, I want you to take this one fact away from my comment:

      The deeply flawed US voting system — the one which forces the two party system on us — is damned near impossible to change via normal legislation and votes.

      It’s THE thing. It is that mechanism that lets the red/blue capitalist american machine continue to vacuum up the vast majority of american votes. Go look up just how much agreement there has to be to amend the constitution. And we’re going to ask the people already in charge to get together and agree to kneecap their future political power. You see the issue.

      Sure, the media is complicit and most voters are ignorant of the fact that there are better systems in place around the world. It’s true that a lot can be done outside of elected positions. But when it comes to the actual voting ballot, since the system self-corrects (in a bad way) for significant third parties, the expected consequences of each choice were something like:

      1. Status quo, including any US resources being used for genocide and other shit.
      2. Genocide Max plan, with 4 free years of Death Camp Prime
      3. Flip a coin between 1 & 2 above (stay home or vote for a third party hoping it will get them recognition and funding)
      4. Revolution and replace the system, like right now!

      And I want to add a caveat that I’m not trying to blame the people who chose #3 above. Before the election I would disagree with that choice, but now in retrospect we know those people weren’t the reason Trump and Republicans won. I guess it remains to be seen how much of it was the genuine love for Trump the maniacs in this place have, and how much of it was election rigging and cheating BS.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Harris wanted to end the war. So option 1 is better than your argument has advertised. Harris was a huge improvement over Biden in that regard. But I digress.

        Every vote counts. The tighter the margins the better. We need the Democrats to do better, as in run better candidates, in order to win, but if they ever do that, there better be a leftist voting block who helped them get into office. Otherwise the Democrats will not feel safe enough to shift left.

        Leftists need to be voting in record numbers to shift the Democratic Party to the left. Part of the way we do that is to vote for Democrats consistently. This should be a mechanical choice of who to vote for in the general. It’s hard to do that when posts disparaging fixing the Democratic Party as impossible or so hard it’s not worth trying are going unchallenged on the internet, including Lemmy.

        Fixing the Democratic Party and this country will take time and a lot of work. Part of that work involves voting for Democrats.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          This should be a mechanical choice of who to vote for in the general.

          This is a very easy point for others to attack, but I want to reiterate its importance and how it relates to what I already said.

          GIVEN all the stuff I explained about how the nigh-impossible-to-change voting system enforces the two-party system especially at the federal level, the reasonable pragmatic conclusion is that you always vote blue in the general because it is the only way to vote against the actual far right nazi party, and you work to get progressives elected to local offices and in national Democratic primaries.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    It may not be worth the effort to reform it, but claiming that it “can’t” be reformed is asinine. A political party is not some higher order being, timeless and unchanging, nor even one with a fundamental permanent set of core tenants that all else springs from. It’s a group of people with a bit of bureaucracy that influence and decide somewhat collectively on their shared goals. Of course that can change fundamentally.

    In fact it has changed fundamentally in the not too distant past. Look at the Democratic party (and the Republican party) of the Jim Crow era compared to today. They essentially flipped to the other side of the political spectrum. It’s absolutely not easy to change a party fundamentally and not quick to do so, either. Old minds are not easily swayed with the times. The primary way to change party ideals is through new minds and perspectives joining the party and the old ones leaving it. Generational change is slow AF but it does definitely happen. Concerted effort for young people with new ideals to join the party is the best way to induce this change. Again though, that is a lot of effort and takes times. The bigger he ship, the harder to steer. There are alternatives, all of which also take a ton of effort, probably a lot more effort really, but might be faster if it works out.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Most people use “can’t” for things that are impractical, not just strictly impossible. But yes, let’s argue about phrasing rather than the issue. That ought to fix everything.

    • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know why we keep having to have this talk about why reformism doesn’t work. Rosa Luxembourg addressed this pretty well.

      We aren’t likely to get Reformations, the problems with the Democratic party are baked directly in to the institution.

      Anything offered as Reformation is a token to ensure that the masses don’t revolt at least until the Reformation can be clawrd back by the powers that be.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Want to watch the Democrat party change?

        Start primarying left and right.

        It’ll change.

        We’ve watched conservative voters change the Republican party to the traitor party they are today in less than 2 decades. It’s completely possible.

        • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          The Democrat Elites thought of that which is why they use super delegates which ensure that a candidate cannot be too radical.

          Not only that the situation surrounding both parties is entirely different. People saw Donald Trump initially as a harmless moron. People in the DNC see radicals and progressives as an enemy to be contained

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yup.

      There are so many Americans that don’t grasp that this change can happen. Or understand the concept but outright refuse to have patience. And like you said, it’s A LOT less effort, a LOT less time, and WAY more possible to primary and change the Democrat party than to cross our fingers for a random 3rd party to start actually doing something and winning some elections and getting reps in the House and Senate.

      I’ve been alive for a while. I watched conservative voters change the Republican party to the fascist traitor party it is today. You can absolutely change political parties.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Problem is this - Dems are not a political party, they’re a fundraising organization.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I know you’re just being reductive, but that’s a silly statement. They are objectively a political party. They also fundraise. They’re not mutually exclusive.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So let me guess. The solution is to vote for a 3rd party that has absolutely no presence in our federal government at all, hoping that magically one of their reps can become president and save the country, despite having absolutely no support within the federal government, at all? And we’ll just all agree to pretend like they won’t become susceptible to corporate interests as well so they can actually accrue enough money to start winning elections.

    Ok, so enough of that stupid bullshit. Let’s hop on back to reality.

    In reality, we have to vote Democrat for the time being because WE JUST FOUND OUT WHAT FUCKING HAPPENS IF WE DON’T. Meanwhile, we hope that a 3rd party can get off its fucking ass and start winning local/state elections so they can start getting MORE THAN ZERO representatives in the House and Senate, so that someday they can actually have a real shot at running a candidate for president.

    This meme is grade school level dogshit. It only serves to split the vote more on 3rd party candidates that can’t win and ensure Republican control of our government for even longer. We don’t live in fantasy land. 3rd parties can’t recite magical incantations and gain control of our federal government. There’s a really fucking long process for a road to the presidency for a 3rd party, and in the meantime, we fucking vote Democrat because HAVE WE FUCKING LEARNED NOTHING?

    • No, at the moment, we have to vote defensively. But we had to vote defensively in 2000 and couldn’t and it got us here.

      And to be fair there’s a trillion-dollar far-right propaganda machine that sucks up the majority of viewership. So yes, in fact, a lot of influence is assuring we’ve learned nothing and will continue to do so until our own necks are in the mire.

      It may be too late now. But it may have been too late in 2016. It may have been too late in 2000.

      Fascist autocratic dissolution of the society is not the only great filter we are facing. An overwhelming amount of work must me done to reverse the FUBAR, and the people are not yet ready for it. Nor are they ready for the horrors of war, famine and pestilence (transmissible diseases like measles), all whose hounds have vaulted their slips.

    • Abigaelle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      WE JUST FOUND OUT WHAT FUCKING HAPPENS IF WE DON’T.

      No, you just found out what happens when your only choices are either nazis or capitalistic corrupt “let’s debate nazis” centrists

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think progressives could easily run in Republican primaries and just start harping on labor and unions since no one else in that party does and tons of Union members vote Republican. What the worst that could happen? Collusion of the national party against the most popular left leaning or presidential candidate in the US, oh wait, the DNC already did that.

  • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think it can be ship of theseus’d, just replace all the key people in the party and keep the name.

    FDR was a democrat, if it could go from that to what it is now, it can be turned back into a socialist party.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Parties can absolutely change with enough pressure.

      I’ve been alive long enough to watch the Republican party almost completely change. Yeah, they were always stupid assholes. But they were not even close to THIS crazy and traitorous. Their base changed them. The liberal base can change the Democrat party.

      The Democrat party is ESTABLISHED. No 3rd party is even remotely close to being established. It is not the time yet to vote for a 3rd party and won’t be until a 3rd party actually gets serious and starts winning smaller elections.

    • Mniot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      This exactly. It’s nonsense to say that the party can’t change because it has changed.

    • Abigaelle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think it can be ship of theseus’d, just replace all the key people in the party and keep the name.

      At this point it’s easier to just nuke it

  • Bud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s not the democratic party, it’s the US itself that is rotten. The dem are just another manifestation of the issue.