• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    What cities really need to do is use this for driver behavior around cyclists. Drivers have to maintain safe passing distances, but they often don’t. And drivers often drive incredibly aggressively, sometimes deliberately driving cyclists off the road. Cyclists should be able to wear cameras and issue tickets to drivers that violate the law. They should get a portion of the ticket revenue for their trouble.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, I would extend that to basically any vehicle-based crimes. It’s crazy how often people in cars blatantly break laws in dangerous ways, and the only thing preventing death is pedestrians, cyclists, and other drivers keeping their heads on swivels.

      If a private corporation can take a picture of your license plate and send an automated ticket for speeding, why can’t I submit dashcam footage of a car blowing through a stop sign in a residential neighborhood.

      If i can report a truck driver for weaving through traffic to the DOT, why can’t I report a Nissan altima?

      I wouldn’t even care if it was like a lower-level offense compared to being ticketed by a driver.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d love to have that in my residential area. Nothing more infuriating than having a car parked across a sidewalk forcing the pedestrian to go into the street to get by.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, I’m sure officers pay the tickets themselves or the department with their pensions and suuuuurely not the taxpayers.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    basically if you take a photo of the violation it will go to the department that issues citations and it will be evaluated to determine if one should be sent. Way more scrutiny than the automated camera ones.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      You mean they’ll check to see who the car belong to, and if they’re one of the people that is above the law.

    • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I would trust the output of an automated system (excluding AI) more than the output of a human, so the difference in scrutiny makes sense. Although I’m not sure how good the automated system is, so I can’t say definitively that’s the case.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t think anything like traffic tickets or such should be 100% automated. I don’t mind an automated filtering mechanism but I think every citation should be written out and signed by someone with all the required trainings and such and they should have viewed and verified that in their opinion a violation occured.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    If the citizens cannot rely on the government to enforce their laws the citizens will rise up and protect themselves.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    People with good Photoshop skills are about to have a great way to get back to the people they don’t like

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh man. Was kind of hoping the headline meant they were handing out official ticketing capability to every ordinary person.

    Would have loved to see that in action.