If it’s America, just shoot. No need for questions at this point.
We shot and thought it was self explanatory.
Other nations need to follow your lead.
I said it right after Venezuela, it was a one time thing.
No country would fire first on America, because what’s the worst that could happen if they didn’t?
Now that ‘they abduct you and your family and take you to America’ is an option, countries are going to shoot first and risk war.
We’re going to see UN stuff move over to Europe as well, leaders aren’t going to want to risk setting foot here.
Good. Someone needs to stand up to Trump.
deleted by creator
Good for them! If you have an armed military coming in to steal your land, you have no other choice but to fight to the death.
Trump wanted to start as many wars as possible as quickly as possible, and his regime is making sure it happens FAST.
Just adding: because he is a a MEGA PEDO WHO RAPED CHILDREN AND THIS IS ALL BECAUSE HE WANTS PEOPLE TO FORGET ABOUT THE EPSTIEN FILES
Also because it’s far easier to justify suspending democratic processes by pointing at an ongoing military crisis and making emergency laws.
This is idiotic. Denmark gave US right to freely access it’s military bases. They signed new treaty in 2023 and further approved US military bases on their soil in 2025! How will they know US is invading them when US has legal right to access their military installations and can request the use private land in Denmark? They will shoot first and ask if they were Americans later?
What is idiotic is the bullshit that the paedo in chief is trying to pull.
It doesn’t matter what Denmark signed 3 years ago now that the other side is threatening an invasion.
Stop everything until either the orange child rapist is killed, dies, is forcibly ousted, or (lol) common sense prevails. Until then any us soldier or worker should be classed as a threat and any unnecessary us personnel should leave. The end.
If any us person in Greenland has to ask themself “am I necessary?”, then they aren’t. And should leave.
If the us population doesn’t like it then they should do something about the russian stooge they’ve enabled to be president (twice).They voted to permit US military bases on Danish soil in 2025, AFTER Trump started talking about taking over Greenland. So Trump made idiotic demand and they rolled over. Now they are trying to play tough. It’s just pathetic.
Stop everything until either the orange child rapist is killed, dies, is forcibly ousted, or (lol) common sense prevails. Until then any us soldier or worker should be classed as a threat and any unnecessary us personnel should leave. The end.
Yeah, they could unilaterally pull out of those treaties but they didn’t. Until they do talking about “shooting first” is just idiotic.
You’d be surprised to learn that Denmark is not really The Netherlands. What the unrelated country had done in 2025 likely has no relation to what Denmark is experiencing.
Fuck, Danish…
As my excuse, English is confusing and it’s not my first language. My point still applies to the whole EU though. They have huge leverage over US but are too divided and cowardly to use it.
It doesn’t matter. They’ve gone from “We might bully you” to “We have the right to take anything we want from any other country”
And as with any bully you should stand up to them and never back down. It matters fuck all about contracts and treaties and agreements.If my next door neighbour said in passing he was going to attack my house, then stated he had the right to attack me in my house you better believe that as soon as I see that neighbour coming anywhere near me then I’m attacking first.
If you want to cower behind ‘agreements’ then you can. See how that works out for you.If my next door neighbour said in passing he was going to attack my house, then stated he had the right to attack me in my house you better believe that as soon as I see that neighbour coming anywhere near me then I’m attacking first.
More appropriate analogy would be that you gave your neighbor a key to your home and now you’re saying that when he breaks into your home you will beat him up him but he can keep the key and can enter whenever he wants.
“Breaks in” is the important part. Since he has a key your statement is an empty threat but let’s you feel in control.
Again, it doesn’t matter.
I could carve a decree in stone that is witnessed by Satan himself that that any neighbour could break in to my house if they want to. It would still be shitty behaviour on their part if they did it, and they should not be shocked if I fight back.
Jesus fucking Christ.
They have to request the use of private land and obviously most of Greenland and Denmark is not a US military base.
But US can freely access their military bases. And US has their own military bases in Greenland. So who Greenland is going to shoot exactly? The airplanes flying to US bases in Greenland? The soldiers legally entering Danish military bases?
Also:
“When requested, the Danish Executive Agent shall make reasonable efforts to facilitate temporary access to and use of private land and facilities (including roads, ports, and airfields), and public land and facilities (including roads, ports, and airfields) that are not a part of an Agreed Facility and Area, including those owned or controlled by Denmark or by local authorities, by U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, and Danish contractors for use in support of U.S. forces. U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, or Danish contractors shall not bear the cost of such facilitation”
US can request access and Denmark has to facilitate it if possible. They can’t just deny it because they don’t feel like it. That’s the 2023 agreement.
“U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, Danish contractors, dependents, and others as mutually agreed are authorized unimpeded access to and use of Agreed Facilities and Areas for visits; training; exercises; maneuvers; transit; support and related activities; refueling of aircraft; bunkering of vessels; landing and recovery of aircraft; temporary maintenance of vehicles, vessels, and aircraft; accommodation of personnel; communications; staging and deploying of forces and materiel; pre-positioning of equipment, supplies, and materiel; security assistance and cooperation activities; joint and combined training activities; humanitarian and disaster relief activities; contingency operations; construction in support of mutually agreed activities”
agreements with the US don’t mean shit anymore, the US has shown that. everything is null.
So we should just declare all international laws null? Yeah, that’s a great idea.
no, all agreements with the US can be ignored, since the US has already decided and shown it will do whatever it wants regardless of existing agreements / laws
It’s generally agreed across the entire world that if you enter a contract with someone and that person breaks the terms of said contract, you are no longer beholden to those terms.
Please show me the part of US-Denmark agreement that says US will stop saying that it should control Greenland. Because international agreement are based on written laws, not feelings.
from what I understand, they also make it pretty easy for American companies to buy licenses to mine whatever they want from the ground
there is no good reason to occupy the country. it makes no sense
The reason is to humiliate and subjugate Europe.
How will they know US is invading
Counterpoint. How will the US know they have taken Greenland. What will be different?
Resource and mineral rights.
The first sign will be that when Denmark pulls out of the treaties and tells US to leave they will just ignore them. This will show that Denmark doesn’t really control the territory. That’s why Denmark didn’t do it yet. As long as it’s just talk they can keep pretending they can somehow defend themselves.
What US can do to prove they actually have taken the territory is to stage some confrontation, for example start mining there without permission. Will Denmark shoot the miners? Will they send police? Military? What if US military defends the miners? Clearly Denmark will not “shoot first and ask questions later” in this situation but US can show they have effectively taken over.
In the end it really depends on what US want’s to achieve here. If they just want resources proving that they can access them at will would be enough,if they want to use if for military operation they just have to prove Denmark can’t kick them out, if they want to control their economy (which I doubt) they will have to kick out Danish administration and force citizens to pay taxes to IRS and if they want to humiliate EU they just have to change it on the maps and show that EU can’t do anything about it.
Yep! So if US comes, they will send in their F35, after having keyed in the mission parameters, that will go straight to a Lockheed server in the US to be uploaded in the jets, and with that they will take their ennemy by surprise!
Oh, shit! The jets were shot down! Weren’t they stealth??
Danes will have to order more, then…
Phones have got to be ringing off the hook at Saab sales offices right now.
I read the German Luftwaffe is interested in the SAAB Gripen. Fucking Rheinmetall and the German government should cancel the F-35 deal.
I heard the US could just remotely disable their equipments… 👀
Can’t tell for all of the equipment (from my understanding, they happily buy 100% US…), but for the F35, that’s not exact. It needs constant update, and from what I read, it is still usable for ~30 days after they would ban it from the network. But “usable” means back to pen and paper on board for missions…
Danes will have to order more, then…
Appreciating the spineless incompetence of the elected officials in our government, I suspect that they would bite the pillow and think happy thoughts while ordering replacements.
I doubt Denmark could fend off the U.S., especially since other NATO countries are likely just monitoring the situation rather than taking action.
The Nordics are pretty great at arctic warfare, just look at how well the Finns did. Pretty much all their gear are usable in arctic conditions and they train regularly for guerrilla warfare in extreme cold. The situation for the US is not the same. Most of their gear will not work in the winter in Greenland.
Im not saying they will win, i just mean that it’s more complex than having the larger gun.
However, the US are about to loose big in trade. Who the hell will want to buy American?
However, the US are about to loose big in trade. Who the hell will want to buy American?
Australian’s. Yes, we’re arseholes.
The US has a military base in Greenland already. Pituffik Space Base doesn’t appear to be going anywhere, despite all the bluster.
And as the US is the military backbone of NATO, I’m not seeing how NATO as an institution would respond with the leadership structure and base management riddled with American personal.
Please tell me the soldiers there call it “Pity Fuck”
Please shoot first. Let’s kick this thing off. For the record, I’m not for taking Greenland via force.
Does that include the US troops already stationed in Greenland?
I would believe if they would not surrender formally and act hostile then yes.
Seems like there’s already enough hostility to justify asking them to leave.
" … that’s how America does it … "
The Johnathon Ross Doctrine.
Can we suggest who you shoot first?
deleted by creator
You might be right that the usa has the military means to conquer Greenland, but Europe has the means to make it not worth it
deleted by creator
Ahem
Vietnam and Afghanistan. You couldn’t win against countries that had almost nothing, if not the desire to defend themselves. Do you think it would go better against NATO?
This chud is absolutely lost in the sauce.
Ah those pesky Boomers. Why bother with thermo-nuclear weapons when you can use a Boomer from 1946-1964.
This stupid idea of those fucking MAGAts is what Putin likes to see how it would play out.
