Walgreens will no longer give many of its retail workers paid vacation time for Thanksgiving, Christmas and other major holidays, as the company looks to cut costs under new owners.

and

Walgreens didn’t respond to requests for comment. Sycamore declined to comment.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    ·
    3 days ago

    it was acquired by private equity firm

    Has that ever ended well for the employees or customers?

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    Our Walgreens is basically a shell at this point. I almost never see more than one person working on a given day. No idea how they keep functional

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Oh, I do. They have like 10 employees, a shift manager and a manager. The manager and the shift manager get 40 hour weeks. The rest of the employees gets like 15 hours a week and the manager will get slapped if they start accidentally scheduling them for more than 35 even if they ask for it.

      Of those 15 hours, like 5 of them will be on shipment/stocking day when they get their shipments in. Usually a less busy day like a Tuesday or something. After the shelves are refilled you really only need a cashier and a supervisor and at really slow times sometimes the cashier can be the supervisor.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well I’m sure that tanking employee retention will help with the problems they have (massive lines at their understaffed pharmacys and one person working 3 counters inside).

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      3 days ago

      They don’t give a fuck they are gonna sell everything for parts after it’s “proven unprofitable”

      • CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Tbh I’m not sure how the business model of “being on every single intersection corner across from our identical competitor, selling items at just above dollar store quality” was ever a profitable plan, for either of the two stupid companies.

  • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wait not giving people their PTO sounds illegal. Im sure it’s not cause thats the states though.

    • Stabbitha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not giving them earned PTO is illegal, but that’s not what they’re doing. From the second paragraph of the article:

      The pharmacy chain eliminated six paid holidays

  • Gary Ghost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s fine we started avoiding them when they let pharmacists refuse to give birth control and hormone therapies. They have sucked long before the new owners

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you still have a local non-chain pharmacy use them until they go out of business. They will eventually because the chains have a stranglehold on pricing and are actively raising costs for independents, then offering to buy the business as it founders.

      Mark Cuban’s Cost Plus drugs is my refuge from pharmacies. It’s cheaper than the chains even if you have insurance, but I can’t be my Adderall through them.

    • Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I second the local. If you have one, they would like your business. Grab some candy and an emergency birthday card while you’re there.

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Several years back I got totally fed up with cvs and Walgreens. It was impossible to get ahold of anyone on the phone, and they were always backed up in the store because of lack of employees. It was a huge hassle because I take care of my grandparents prescriptions, and there are like 15 medications per month.

      Switched over to a local pharmacy. Every time I go in, they have tons of friendly employees working, I’ve never had to wait more than a couple minutes to be helped, and I call and someone answers the phone within seconds most of the time. And the prices are about the same.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m stuck with corporate pharmacies, unless I want to drive 45 minutes one-way.

      As we head into a world-wide recession, job opportunities are dropping. Employers will no doubt take advantage of that to further exploit workers. I’m afraid things are going to get much worse before they get better.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    So is it more ethical for me to boycott them or should I go out of my way to shop there and pay more for their employees they stifle out of wages?

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Buy only loss leaders. Stand in front of high-traffic areas failing to make up your mind. Find ways to waste their time then tip them generously for their “help.”

      Make sure they make more money doing work that isn’t profitable for Walgreens than they make doing work that is profitable for Walgreens, and they’ll start prioritizing unprofitable work. Incentivize goldbricking.