Is this the same leak from back in May, or an entirely new one?

DataOne was given 45 days to apply for the permits or else cease operations, but they can continue operating the gas engines while seeking permits.

I don’t have a link, but I do remember reading the article about this about a week ago. I think it happened in a Walmart, and the article didn’t really go into details about what the actual crime was.

I think it’s a little different from that. Of course it varies on a case by case basis depending on exactly what is released, but if the model architecture is documented and you are able to train or fine-tune it with your own data, I think that counts for something, even if you don’t know exactly what their released model was trained on. If all the code is available to produce the model, just not the dataset, I would still consider that open source.

I don’t really see anything here arguing that AI generated works are copyrightable. It would probably help if the article actually mentioned what it was in response to, because that’s a pretty important thing to just gloss over. But it sounds to me like it’s saying that copyright protections don’t need to be strengthened even more than they already are, just because companies are afraid that they will make less profits because of ai existing.

So instead of the video doorbell, use a simple camera. Then people knock on the door and you still have security footage without all the nonsense.

What exactly define a “recap”? I was looking at one of the channels in question, and I basically saw entire episodes posted, just with commentary over them. I would expect a recap to be a summary, not the whole thing.

Well, it’s a good thing that AI is being used to fix tons of bugs and potential exploits before it comes to that, isn’t it?

Well this sucks. This game looks awesome, but I guess it’s coming off of the wishlist.

No, this applies to the old mp4 codecs like xvid/divx. Mpeg4 AVC is still patented in some jurisdictions.

Open source ai is doing well. Mozilla integrating the models directly into it’s browser doesn’t really do anything to help them.

Paywalled

My takeaway from the article is that these “costs” are what it would have cost to actually license the use of a celebrity for every random ai social media post.

Basically the same copyright math they have been using for years, where every pirated copy of something is a loss of the full msrp.

I have a blink camera, not a doorbell camera, but just a regular outdoor camera that I have near the front door. The batteries in it lasted nearly a year before they needed replacing. Curious how long it was lasting in your doorbell camera? I would expect it to be similar unless it’s basically recording constantly or something.

Is the joke that she’s levitating, or just really good at jumping rope?

It says it in the article, it just takes some data from the patients chart and calculates a score for the person’s risk of getting an infection.

deleted by creator

There are plenty of small models that you can run locally, and they can be fine tuned on different types of content.

For me it is not currently worth it. Donkey Kong looks amazing, but I’m not paying that much just to play a single game. In a couple of years when more games are available, maybe that could change.

How does this go along with the other one saying he couldn’t fire Lisa Cook without cause? What’s the difference here?