• AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      The average voter also can’t see a long term perspective but only lives in the present, and can’t see other people’s perspectives but only their own.

      Not only can they not see externalities like climate change, they can’t see long term issues like climate change and they can’t see anyone wanting to do anything differently from themselves.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They also can’t see long term issues like traffic keeps getting worse and getting a few hundred people off rhe road at rush hour would actually be fucking awesome

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      A critical amount of voters is not supposed to understand or realise the concept of externalities.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only if you have some evil socialist public healthcare. Privatization means you can charge the victims for the impact of shitty and unsafe infrastructure

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surprise, emergency rooms are often subsidized when people are treated and discharged without the ability to pay. It was one of the rationals for why ACA was cost saving.

  • lightnegative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I went on the LA subway as a tourist, my first time in the USA. It was terrifying. It was also way too cheap, id happily pay 3x the price for it to be less terrifying

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Too cheap? Public transit should be free.

      Offer to pay more taxes instead or defund stuff like the military.

      • lightnegative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In USA, isn’t tax considered an affront to freedom?

        The LA public transport is in a death spiral because the taxpayers dont see a need for it because they all have cars. So funding gets directed elsewhere. But they want to people to not have the excuse “oh, it’s too expensive” for not using it, so they make the fare super cheap.

        Therefore, it’s caught between hardly any funding and also hardly any income