• Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because they’re completely different gods. The old testament is only a part of christianity because in order to gain some legitimacy for their early church, they decided that their new god must be the same dude as the the god of the people that they were living among.

    But in reality, they are very different books, written in very different times, by two very different religious cultures.

    • potoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah, they are “very different books” each individually comprised of “very different books,” and all of the other books that eventually got left out are a lot of the best parts. I haven’t read them, but it feels like how my friend used to describe the Star Wars extended universe books.

    • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also, the old testament god is not a single god.

      It started as a god among other equally powerful and important gods and was later turned (by the writers) into the most important god.

      Then it turned into god and satan as being similar in power.

      Nowadays, the majority of church people flip the switch whenever they want a bi-theism (god vs satan) or a monotheism (god is all powerful and even satan can’t act with god’s explicit orders).

      Similar thing with free will.

      You have free will until you don’t have and you have no free will until it is convenient to say you actually have.

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Because the people who wrote the old testament wanted to scare people into subservience

    And those who wrote the new testament thought positive reinforcement was better

  • NovaSel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    If I had to guess, it’s because they were written by different people at different times.

  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    I feel like y’all are forgetting about all the heinous shit God does in the new testament. Just because he’s not all up front fire and brimstone about it doesn’t mean he isn’t still an evil bastard in the new book

    • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      And Christ died in the cross to teach us (only those who have a fragment of the divine) how to ascend to perfection and get out of the Demiurge’s hand. Btw, those who don’t have a fragment of the divine are just NPC (just like myself who am also an NPC)

  • homura1650@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Going well beyond my competencies to answer, but I think a lot of it comes down to monotheism changing the nature of god.

    Judaism thinks of itself as starting monotheism; and that is largely true. However, the old testament is still littered with vestiges of it’s polytheistic origins.

    If there are multiple God’s, then those God’s will come into conflict. That is simply the nature of human storytelling.

    Looking at the old Testament, probably the most violent God has been was during exodus. In addition to freeing the Jews, he smite the Egyptians with 10 plagues, among which was the death of all firstborn sons.

    For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the LORD. (Exodus 12:12)

    Note the polytheistic origins of this story. God is not merely intervening in the Earthly affairs of us lowly humans. The Jewish God is fighting with the Egyptian gods. He does not have the luxury of being nice and good. Even if he wins this fight without resorting to such drastic measures; he still needs to do so to act as a deterrent against other gods acting against him. That is not so much a specific tactical calculation in this case, but the way humans tend to imagine polytheistic gods working (reflective, of course, of the way human conflict tends to work).

    It probably doesn’t help that Yahweh was the god of War before becoming the only God.

    By the time we get to the new testament, the situation is different. Beyond merely declaring that their god is the only God, the early Christians believed it, and had believed it for generations of storytelling. Their view of God had shed the vestiges of polytheism and morphed into what is truly possible under monotheism. God can be good because he lacks a peer rival. There is no narrative reason for God to be mean, because he can simply win any direct confrontation he faces.

    We see similar dynamics play out in modern story telling. When we have vastly overpowered characters, the nature of the conflicts they get in us not fights. Perhaps they are trying to mediate between lesser parties. Perhaps they want to get something while respecting the rights and interests in weaker parties. A story where a vastly superior force wants something and just takes it is boring; so we don’t tell it.

      • C0untWintermute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Hulk’s power level has no upper limit. Wolverine can heal, sure. But if Hulk smashes him down to atoms, and smashes those atoms together, it’s gonna be a long healing process.

        • MissJinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Never heard of that. Hulk is very strong for sure but wolverine is also “very strong”.I don’t think smashing something to atoms is only a matter of force It should also be abiut size

      • ChetManly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        How about eternal torture for something as petty as non belief? Sounds pretty manipulative, insecure, and evil to me.

        • “Eternal Torture”, as a concept, was invented by Catholics in the dark ages.

          The lake of fire and brimstone is eternal torture. If you are not satan, its the lake of fire what is meant. It is eternal separation from God. The God that made you and Creation. To be separated from Him is to live life without living, eternally without any life. Eternal darkness. To say, without all the good the universe has to offer. You’re left with nothing but the worst humanity, the spiritual world and the universe has to offer. And it is called the second death, its eternal and not long sleepy rest death like when your earthly body ceases.

          • ChetManly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The question was about the new testament. Its literally described in the books of Matthew/Mark and literally says not believing in god is a worth sin of hell in John/Thessalonians.

            I also agree eternal torture was made up. I think it was all made up.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    God is not about forgiveness and such in the New Testament. That’s a retcon by later Christians to make it more palatable.

    He preached violence:

    Matthew‬ ‭10:34‬: Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

    He was just as happy to send people to hell:

    Matthew‬ ‭13:41-42: The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

    Every single horrible decree in the Old Testament still applies in the new (despite modern Christians trying to redefine what ‘fulfil’ means):

    Matthew‬ ‭5:17-18‬: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

    That’s last one includes all the slavery, rape, genocide, etc. Jesus could have spoken out against those things, but instead he said all those judgements were just and should be continued.

    Matthew‬ ‭10:21‬: And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.

    Pretty violent, and not very loving.

    And let’s not forget the revelations, in which Jesus will doom billions of people to a horrific existence followed by eternal hellfire, not for doing wrong things, but merely for not being devoted to him. Even the devout and righteous of other religions, and even babies who haven’t had the chance to sin.

    Remember, Jesus is the same god as in the Old Testament – if god is eternal and unchanging (which the Bible says he is), he is literally the same entity who committed atrocities before he decided to wear human skin and sacrifice himself to himself.

    This is not a loving god.

  • ZMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wow, this comment section… Yikes. Without getting deep in the weeds, testament means covenant. It was god’s new agreement with man. In layman’s terms, matthew 1:1 starts out like, “here’s the deal man”.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      It was god’s new agreement with man

      Um, isnt ‘gawd’ the boss? Cant he just make rules and a system that works and boom it happens?

      Frankly instead of all this armchair biblical experts, its probably better to get answers from real experts like Justin from Deconstruction Zone.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        No argument here. Literally. I have no dog in any respective race. Figuratively.

        And I would imagine that the community “no stupid questions” is not intended to be a repository of questions exclusively for SME’s. As I understand it is an open forum to ask unspecified questions judgement free. I would presume that since the question is judgement free, the responses should be too. But this comment section is seething with judgements that add very little to the conversation regarding the basic query from OP. So, thanks for the suggestion on Justin. I assume they have a lot to say and I’m sure others will find it invaluable. This is not something I have a significant interest in myself so I’ll take your word for it. Thanks.

            • Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              No worries, learned to have to speak as if no one knows anything when I started running DnD games. It’s really easy to do when you know a subject as well as you seem to

              • ZMonster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Lol, DnD types are the test case of outliers. If nothing else, it taught me to never assume someone isn’t a player.

                Like, one campaign from an OCD person where even the scents and smells were planned. And then a different campaign where the smells were not. Just a pure dichotomy of human prototypes.

                • Jarix@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Scents and smells? That is so far beyond my ability to prepare but that’s awesome for you(I assume!)

                  Ive found its a good baseline to start with until you can gauge who you are speaking to.

                  In connection with the comic XKCD - 10000,it has helped a socially awkward geek like me when speaking to people in meetings or on projects. Kind of follow the I said it outright the first time and emphasize it slightly the first time I use a phrase if I’m going to refer to it a few times and try to shorten it for convenience

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh dude I just saw Justin on The Line last night with Forrest Valkai, dude seems to know the Bible like the back of his hand

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    Fiction usually has highs and lows. Unfortunately all the authors wrote under pseudonyms, and multiple editors went through the plagiarized stories, some books were left out, and the consistency is just a mess. Not to mention the terrible translations. Your local Library most certainly has better Fiction books that are very well written and highly entertaining.

  • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    The old guys message wasn’t working anymore, the age of Pharos and godkings was done. You couldn’t just mass execute people anymore, everyone was really woke and PC.

    The ruling class needed to revamp the religious arm of the machine that enslaves us all to get with the times or there were going to keep being problems.

    You know how corporate media are, it’s easier to sell a sequel.

    You know what, we’re going for a kind of apple vibe, we’re literally just going to call this thing “THE BOOK”.

    Everyone will step into line after we nail a few to boards and stuff

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The old guys message wasn’t working anymore

      The new testament is just old testament fan fiction. By that reasoning all these newer religions like Mormonism are fan fiction based on other fan fiction… and Im sure I dont have to tell anyone how loony tunes Mormonism is.