She’s embarked on a nationwide tour with Vermont’s Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, held town halls outside of her district in upstate New York, and raised $15 million

Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive who has cemented her popularity with young voters, is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028.

Ocasio-Cortez, 35, made a splash when she was elected to represent New York’s 14th congressional district, located in the Bronx and Queens, in 2019. Now, the Democrat is reportedly considering taking the next step in her political career as the party searches for its next generation of leaders, Axios reported Friday.

Members of Ocasio-Cortez’s team have recently been positioning the progressive lawmaker, known as AOC, to either run for president or run for a Senate seat.

      • bus_factor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not the guy you’re responding to, but historically it’s been a lot easier to be taken seriously after a stint in the Senate. Hard to say if that’s still the case, we live in weird times, but the Democrat establishment is a lot more bound by tradition than Republicans, and it frequently leads them astray.

        • neatchee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It’s very possible with a coalition formed through other recent success stories like Mamdani, she’s concluded that a coup of sorts is possible (and I mean that with the utmost excitement). They might have numbers showing now is the time to capitalize on a ground swell and really shift the party. I’m assuming they’ve got some sort of data backing this, even if it’s just “we don’t know if we can win but we know the establishment Democrats will lose”

    • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I know I’m a day late here replying but this narrative is just antiquated like our entire system. If we want to keep at this, we don’t need her after a stint in the Senate, we need her now. What exactly will she gain by going that route? Because it’s the best way to gain respect? Maybe she’ll get some experience?

      Look, statistically you are right. But let’s run the facts, normal is just a setting on the dryer and we’re not playing by the standard rulebook anymore.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Usually it is said that someone is ‘contemplating’ or ‘planning’ a run for office, but since it’s about a woman the headline says ‘plotting’ because that sounds underhanded and nefarious and the media wants to get the framing in place early.

    That said, I think it would be better for her to run to replace Schumer in the Senate. A better chance to win and could do more good there.

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I suspect poor headline editing. The article is about multiple options (Senate, President, other party-promoting path) where the navigational use of the term (“plotting a course”) is reasonable. But then the headline couldn’t fit even two options, so it got reduced to just President and no one on the team connected that plotting has a negative implication with a single subject.

  • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    Look if she comes out of the box swinging, and I mean haymakers both left and right, she could do it. The DNC has to have an honest to god real primary and not the horse shit they pulled with Bernie or the last-minute Harris takeover.

    If AOC wins a primary and is nominated, hits the ground at a full sprint, doesn’t pull punches on either side of the political spectrum, prays to Jah, and crosses her fingers she could do a Billy Clint or Obama. She is going to have to learn to play the Saxophone, confess to smoking weed and inhaling, slow jam the news, and probably host a full episode of SNL not just appear as herself in a sketch. If she did all that and she convinces Jesus to come down from on high and endorse her she has a 50/50 chance.

    Oh, and she’ll need a gun for her purse like that bargain bin Barbie from Colorado or the dude from Georgia’s 14th congressional district.

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      He’ll be 78, it would be reasonable for him to retire when his term is up in 2028. Hopefully the fiascos with Biden and multiple Democratic Representatives dying of old age this term (and the Republican Representative who went missing because her family put her in assisted living), and just slightly further back Feinstein being too sick to make critical votes, all push people to stop hanging on to their seats all the way to the bitter end. Pelosi leading the way here, showing it can be done.

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Any democrat who runs on a populist message that doesn’t just pander to working Americans can win the presidency… just not the primary.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    Nah. She’s politically what the country needs, but get serious, no way will America ever vote a woman as President.

    • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      We should let the Democratic party choose a person through a primary to run for president and then allow that person to run for president.

      If a woman makes it through that process on her own merits then the party will probably vote for her.

      If on the other hand a woman is selected because she’s a woman who will cooperate with the donors and they decide to skip that process or subvert it in some way then you probably won’t win.

      • Ocean@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why would anyone do that when you can just complain about needing change, but do absolutely nothing to support or advocate for it! Or better yet, you can just start applying uninformed purity tests to progressive candidates. “She wants to implement the change I want to see, but because I don’t understand how legislation is passed in the US, I’ll accuse her of giving money to Israel’s occupation, and say she’s complicit in genocide” - average internet leftist.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    If AOC is the candidate, it will be the first time since Bernie that I will phone bank, knock down doors, canvas … Whatever it takes.

    She is one of the few people in politics that I can get behind.

  • ExLisperA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    " is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028."

    Stupid clickbait title.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    As much as I would love a very progressive Democrat from New York to be president she realistically has no chance of getting enough voters to win the GE especially in the purple/red states that Harris had a hard time with.

    The best she could aim for is running in the primary, shaking up the candidates and getting the winner to adopt her agenda or at least have her as a VP.

    • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair, Harris was a reasonably unlikable candidate. Maybe AOC has similar baggage. I hope not. I’d love to see her at the top of a ticket.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      especially in the purple/red states that Harris had a hard time with.

      Bullshit. She has a better chance in those states than Harris had, specifically because she isn’t an establishment Democrat.

      How much longer is it going to take before folks finally start to get it through their heads that left populists like Bernie and AOC can tap into the same disillusionment that Trump exploited?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      especially in the purple/red states that Harris had a hard time with.

      Harris had a hard time with those places because she was an empty suit neoliberal promising no significant change whatsoever and also genocide. The whole “it’s misogyny and/or racism” thing is a cop out so establishment Dems don’t have to confront their godawful platform. Obama sure as hell didn’t struggle with those red and purple states.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Unlike Biden?

          Literally yes. Biden was the most progressive American president in a loooong time (or at least one of the most progressive depending on how you parse Obama), and his campaign showed it. I mean he was still a neolib and definitely not the man of the hour, but in more normal times (and without a genocide to aid and abet) he’d be considered a better than average president, though one with his pitfalls.

          Obama is a man.

          Black men were granted the right to vote in America before white women were.

          Sure, but I have a very hard time believing your average potential blue voter (so not MAGA chuds) would hate a black woman appreciably more than a black man. Black is firmly at the top of the hierarchy of American hate; they got the right to vote sooner because they were willing to take to the streets about it sooner.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think winner adopted agenda would be nice but I don’t think VP is the move. I would love for her to take Schumers seat.