• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s fine to do that if you’re pre-customer and you’re just dabbling with a new idea. Once you are ready to go public though you need to be stable and secure. The big problem is when people try to apply the same development philosophy between established software and pre-alpha software.

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree. It heavily depends on the “things” you’re breaking

      If it’s prod, that’s bad

      If it’s your “fuck-around” branch, go for it

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Once you are ready to go public though you need to be stable and secure

      Is that really true though? If you have a product people actually want, they’ll use it regardless of bugs

      • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        That won’t be true once your competition catches up to you and your bug-riddled product is pissing off customers, pushing them towards your competitors.

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          How much do you tolerate before switching sides? Think about Windows vs Linux. People don’t switch.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    Move fast, break things.

    Move slow, break things.

    Don’t move at all, break things.

    Maybe I’m just bad at CSS

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Controversial opinion: I think software moving fast isn’t a good thing.

    The more versions come out and the more focus there is on new features, the more half baked/abandoned the existing features become and there will be more vulnerabilities.

    • bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      I probably shouldn’t even be using youtube in the first place, but 5 min ago I found out youtube is now forcing videos with an AI translated voice. While at the same time not having an option to change the audio track or disable the feature.

      This feels like a good example of pushing features most people don’t want while not providing a normal way to disable it.

      Thank God I use revanced and can spoof the client as IOS TV, this gives you the option do disable that crap.

      Firefox (even mobile) has this addon “YT Anti Translate”

      It’s pretty bad you have to go this far just to watch a video with the actual voice it was released with…

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Thanks for the heads up! I had been disliking every video with AI voice, unaware they might have been uploaded in another language.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Going slow doesn’t mean you don’t break things either. If you don’t want to break things, you need test plans, logging and alerts

  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    If we break things, we can’t move at all.

    We need functioning things in order to move.

  • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    These assholes are bringing this mentality to the infrastructure industry now. As little as it worked in software development I promise you it works even less in large scale construction. That’s why infrastructure engineers are required to be licensed, we tried this bs 200 years ago and shit literally went off the rails

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I call bullshit. If you’re competent enough, the process of breaking things might actually let you learn stuff. And if you have a controlled environment, breaking things shouldn’t be an issue.