U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) introduced the Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025, legislation that would require contractors to provide the Department of Defense (DoD) with access to technical data and materials the military needs to repair and maintain its own equipment.

  • Zron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    What about the civilian right to repair.

    Why can’t we all just be allowed to fix all of our shit. Sell me parts, let me open up things and poke around without illegals saying I violated the warranty.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Don’t worry. We prioritize the military over healthcare, wealth disparity, hunger, homelessness, cost of living, climate change, etc. This issue will be resolved right quick.

    But fuck veterans. They can go fuck off and die.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 days ago

    So the military has been bound by the same handcuffs that McDonalds is with it’s ice cream machines?

    It was messed up that McDonalds agreed to that. It’s TERRIFYING that the group in charge of our military ever did.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    While this isn’t as far as I’d like them to go, this is extremely big news. The amount of money spent on absolute bullshit fees by defense contractors is bonkers. Us taxpayers are shelling out billions of dollars to buy a single jet that we then have to spend millions of dollars per year to maintain, simply because we aren’t allowed to maintain it ourselves.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is really going to confuse MAGA. Pro-military but anti-corporate profits…

    <grabs popcorn>…

    • big_slap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      your first mistake was thinking anyone associated with maga will think this critically, lol

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Boy oh boy really putting through the important shit huh? God damn do I hate our current politicians.

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This is important. Rossman did an interview with a few military techs, and here are few highlights

      • they couldn’t get the router password (that they own) for troubleshooting. Imagine your ISP locked you out of the router?
      • it cost 200k to ship a 100k part because they weren’t allowed to fix the broken one. 300k - thats a decent sized home in some areas, just to replace a wire or something. (Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses)
      • they have to fly manufacture service techs that don’t get schematics, if they need them, an engineer is flown out who closely guards them.

      Its a complete waste of taxpayer money. Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

      We’re allowed to fix our own cars (although manufactures are trying to stop that), why can’t the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors? Get a foothold in the military sector and the rest will follow.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is important.

        It’s the downstream consequence of decades of outsourcing, kicked off in earnest in the Reagan Administration. “Right to Repair” is just the tip of an enormous iceberg of military privatization.

        Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

        That’s the nut of it. This money is being wasted in the general sense. But it isn’t wasted in the eyes of crony legislators and bureaucrats who see themselves on the receiving end of the kickback stream.

        This goes back to the BBB and its rampage through some of the most high efficiency Medicaid programs on offer, in order to shuttle somewhere between $175B and $541B (depending on who is counting) to a national security system that’s just legions of badged up bullies harassing locals for the entertainment of a few hooting chuds.

        why can’t the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors?

        Because

        and SaaS is how corporate industry has decided it will continue to grow its profits indefinitely.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          But it isn’t wasted in the eyes of crony legislators and bureaucrats who see themselves on the receiving end of the kickback stream.

          Which is also why people active against this will be killed many times before the stream made dry out.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        So finally they’ve figured out that “privatization” is a shitty idea. Not only does it introduce another point of failure in logistics and operations, but the private sector doesn’t mind trying to make every contract on they can retire off of using taxpayer money.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Just informing you that good old USSR had a similar problem, except not just with the military.

          It, of course, had planning inefficiency problems, but the reason some stuff costed and was funded orders of magnitude more than the Western alternatives (sometimes being clones of those alternatives) was just that industries producing this stuff were closer to important interests in internal politics. Soviet production lines were not that much less efficient.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses

        That “military pricing” is called “corruption”. Despite everyone knowing that it happens in most militaries (or big b2b), it still is that.

        Its a complete waste of taxpayer money. Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

        I mean, you had a truly magnificent military budget for already 30 years after the nation which was supposed to be the problem solved by it started asking for food aid and falling apart into pieces.

        When the funds are provided and it’s certain they won’t have to be used, the tasks existing expand to fill the budget.

        The US military budget is so over the top that even things that it achieves are not so significantly different from what Russian military budget with Russian corruption achieves, yet its size utterly dwarfs that.

        If US military budget were used as efficiently as that of, say, Poland, US military would have colonized most of the Solar system already. With actual people as colonists.

        That’s about that fiscal discipline the Republican party was supposedly in favor of, until it wasn’t.

        OK, I live in Russia, so shouldn’t probably blabber too much about US politics.

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Thanks for the type up! I really do appreciate the info, I’m just bitching about the current state of things and how this seems like a distraction compared to the laundry list of other stuff going on.

        • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          No problem. I’m not happy with the current state of things either, but crossing one thing off the list, even if its lower priority to us, is still good for someone.

          I find it interesting that some of the other comments go on picking apart my thing, that basically boil down to military = bad, so right to repair = bad and its not a problem because they are already wasting money. Be glad something good is moving forward.

          Consumer rights have been increasingly stomped on by the mega corporations for years now, and they continuasly push the boundries. The very concept of a terms of service “contract” that can be changed anytime by 1 party (and heavily in their favor) is insane. The more control we get back the better.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    That wasn’t a thing already? Not a requirement for military orders?

    You mean they could ship something into the military without proper documentation and bill it every time maintenance has to be done?

    Some things in your land of the free seem to confuse me.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    perfect example of the tone-deaf left.

    corporate democrats will never get it and are just “republican lite”.

    jackasses.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        instead of pushing for a right to repair for all US citizens, including military, they instead opt for right to repair for military only.

        this sends the message that corporate interests are far more valuable to political leaders than the needs of their constituency.

        Warren looks great on paper, but given the opportunity she fails to deliver to the American public what is needed. she’s no different than Joe Biden, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, etc. At the end of the day they serve their corporate masters and not the public.

        if they did serve the public this wouldn’t even be news because everyone would have had the right to repair decades ago.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Got it. Since what they did wasn’t 100% perfect and a fix to everything, they are tone deaf and terrible politicians. It’s a really good thing what they did, but since it doesn’t help you personally, then it is a terrible thing. They recognized something that needed fixing that will save billions of taxpayer dollars and hurts large corporations, but since they didn’t fix the thing that impacts you then it is bad.

          Also, this is the OPPOSITE of sending the message that corporate interests are more valuable. This is saying that corporations that are making billions off taxpayer funded contracts will no longer be able to bilk us (as much).

          Yes, they should absolutely go after the right to repair for everyone, but maybe (and I’m just spitballing here) Warren knows that she couldn’t get the Republican majority to vote yes on a full package and went for the win she could get instead of blocking something that does do good. You do realize, right, that the Democrats do not have a majority anywhere in the federal government?

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            maybe instead of trying to work with the fascist ideological cult, previously known as the Republican party, her and her fellow democrats should instead be focused on making it as difficult as possible for the current fascist regime to function?

            maybe if they had a spine to stand up for what is best for the country we might not be facing the realistic threat of concentration camps in America.

            they were elected to serve and protect American interests. tell me, how does working with the “obvious elephant” in the room serve and protect American interests?

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Liberals will fight for the rights of the military, while the military is being used on domestic soil to actively oppress our rights. Predictable as ever.