Because of the two, 2 girls 1 cup has less shit in it.
Bravo, sir…bravo.
Because journalism is an ongoing profession where people regularly receive money for their work, producing a publication has a lot of costs, and 2g1c is a single fake scat porn clip filmed ages ago.
Let’s rephrase the question: “is it cheaper to find and view that popular video from 20 years ago than a single news article the NY Times released 20 years ago?”
Otherwise, you’re comparing a current events media platform to a once-popular video hosted everywhere.
Because the infamous 2 girls 1 cup video is just a trailer. It was always meant to be free.
The girls in that video certainly do not get royalty checks
I sometimes wonder what became of them. I like to think they finally bought a second cup so they didn’t have to share anymore.
Neither do the reporters who write for the Times or any other newspaper.
It’s still expensive to run an ongoing news organisation, unlike a janky old video from decades ago.
So what you’re saying is, we need new 2G1C content regularly, and with a higher production quality
takes notes
