• HrabiaVulpes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We degraded status of planet named after god of underworld… and the world started going down the drain.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I’m not concerned with Pluto’s feelings. If it’s too small, has an irregular orbit, hasn’t cleared its immediate vicinity, etc., then fine, it doesn’t meet the objective standards by which we’re going to define planets going forward, that’s totally acceptable.

    But saying that a dwarf planet isn’t a planet is just bad etymology. It’s got the word planet right in there, but it’s not a planet? That’s super confusing for the casual user.

    Planetoid, on the other hand, had been in common use for literally decades, and it makes perfectly good etymological sense. Asteroid = star-like, because if you’re not careful you might mistake it for a star. Planetoid = planet-like, for the same reason.

    I don’t want justice for Pluto, I want justice for linguistic clarity!

    • Erusset@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Should be something like PeniPlanet/PaenPlanet = “Almost a planet”, Like Peninsula/Paeninsula = “Almost an island”

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The new definition is bullshit. Even earth hasn’t fully cleared its orbit.

    Gótefodamn Inyalowdas just wanna keep my home Ceres down, Sasa Ké?

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    I like to imagine the alternative world, where instead of deplanetizing Pluto, they planetized all the dwarf planets and planetoids in our system.

        • frog@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Is it an outlier because the moon is a pretty big satellite for such a snall planet?

      • bob_lemon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        And the 2006 decimation of planet that made Pluto not a planet explicitly added “must not orbit another object” to stop the moon from being a planet.

      • mrsemi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        in Asimov’s Foundation series, there is (was) a galaxy-spanning human civilization, but Earth was lost and mostly considered mythical. One of the arguments against it actually existing was the absurdity of such a double planet system existing. In the wider galaxy only giant planets had such large satellites.

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          In his books were they similarly absurdly tiny, rotating in irregular orbits well outside of their class of planets, and inhabiting an entire solar system of similarly sized unremarkable objects?

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      If that happened, then school children would no longer be required to learn the names of all of the planets. That’s just a practical concern with adding another several dozen planets to the list.

      And I think it is worthwhile to make kids learn the names and some basic facts about the 8 planets we have.

      • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Did you ever have to memorize the periodic table? This would be a walk in the park by comparison, at least using the current dwarf planet definition.

        • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s a grade school vs high school thing though. Also only our AP chem class had to memorize the entire table. Knowing the first 20-40 was sufficient for everyone else.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Officially only 4 trans-Neptunian objects have been recognized as dwarf planets. But here’s a paper that proposes another 36 known objects to be dwarf planets.

          That’s about what the situation was in 2006 as well. A new technology was worked out to make it easier to find these, and once it did a bunch of discoveries came in really fast. The writing was definitely on the wall.

          If you include the entire Oort cloud, there could be billions of objects out there.

          • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think that’s so cool!

            I wonder what they’re like (I’m sure the answer is cold and rocky, but still!)

            We need more deities!

            • nagaram@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              According to Plato we can just keep making them up. So I’m down!

              My addition is Uupta goddess of warm fires and comforting foods. Put her wherever but I feel she’s close to the sun somehow.

          • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I thought dwarf planets still had to be round, and they just lack the “cleared its orbit” requirement (e.g. Ceres in the asteroid belt). That would disqualify any Oort cloud objects except Pluto and Charon as far as I know.

            • mkwt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s true. Dwarf planets do have to be round (“in hydrostatic equilibrium”). That requirement will definitely disqualify many of the hypothetical billions of Oort cloud objects.

              Ceres is an official dwarf planet, but I excluded it from my list because I was focusing on trans-Neptunians.

              A big reason why the IAU hasn’t confirmed most of the 36 is because they want strong evidence of roundness, like a spacecraft flyby with direct imaging. Pluto and Eris are close enough that earth telescopes can just barely resolve some of their shapes.

              Finally, Pluto and Charon are too close to be considered in the Oort cloud. Sedna, whose discovery precipitated a lot of this crisis, has been nominated as the very first discovered object in the “inner Oort cloud.” Sedna’s perihelion is at 76 AU.

              • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oops, right – Pluto and Charon are in the Kuiper Belt, not the Oort Cloud. I really shouldn’t mix those up.

                I thought Haumea, Eris, and Makemake were solidly considered dwarf planets. But we don’t have good images of those, do we?

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    fun fact: it’s also the only planet discovered by an american, which i suspect is why americans have such a big “pluto is a planet” movement - they’re proud of the only planet they discovered.

    i’ve literally never heard anyone argue about whether pluto is a planet over here in europe. it’s just not an issue.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think most Americans are aware of Pluto being an American discovery. That would require scientific and historical knowledge, both things that are not our strong points.

      I say this as an American astronomy nerd.

    • roker@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      This comment takes the cake for the weirdest anti-American comment I’ve read on Lemmy today. I get it, America is bad, but how in the sam’s hell did you come to the conclusion that it had anything to do with an American discovering it? (90% of the country probably doesn’t know that, btw)

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yeah as an American I had no idea. Our main source of pride with space is the whole walking on the moon thing.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, there was a group of Europeans that were pretty adamant about it not being a planet.

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What about in the old myths where Pluto, Neptune, Mars were used as god’s names? Weren’t they referring to the planets back then?

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            That said, some planets that are visible with the naked eye have been long associated with deities. Notably Venus (sometimes called the Morningstar) was associated with beauty/love goddesses including Venus/Aphrodite and Ishtar/Inanna.

    • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly. Planet is a social construct and we changed the threshold for what was considered one.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, our scientific understanding evolved, and a classification of something changed. It’s really not any deeper than that.

      Happens constantly in science. Kind of one of its defining features actually

  • mrsemi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    https://youtu.be/kK0KPuH32mc

    Take a lesson from space

    They say “Pluto’s not a planet”

    Do you think that Pluto gives a shit?

    Pluto is not gonna quit

    'Cause Pluto can take a hit

    And Pluto knows what Pluto is

    And Pluto knows that Pluto’s

    Hot shit!

    And you know Pluto knows it

    I won’t ever be a planet, it don’t matter, 'cause I know that I’m still

    Hot shit!

    And you’re hot shit too, so get out of your brain and just do what you’re supposed to do!

    Hot shit!

    And you know Pluto knows it

    Expect some fuckin’ magic from the Dwarf Planet

    Hot shit!

    And you’re hot shit too, so get out of your way and just do what you were born to do!

    • Starik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      With depravity I break laws of gravity

      Blast past the atmosphere to the last frontier

      I go boldly through space and time

      The sky’s the limit, but they’re limiting the sky

      I break orbit by habit

      I ignite satellites and leave rings round the planets

      A flying ace like that beagle

      Nevertheless this alien remains illegal

      Cause their discovery don’t cover me, the immigrants

      Been left in the cold to grow old and disintegrate

      Discriminate against the distant and disclaim this

      Cause small minds can’t see past Uranus

      But I shun their rays, cause stun’s just a phase

      And my odyssey runs in 2001 ways

      And I can see clearly now like Hubble

      Shoved off the shuttle, here’s my rebuttal It’s a planet

      Who do you represent? I represent the smallest planet

      Attorney in this tourney versus those who tried to ban it

      If you don’t agree, go see Interplanet Janet

      Cause the sun is star, like Pluto is planet

      So lend me all your ears and let me state my case

      About all the types of satellites we must embrace

      Cause like parents’ great-grandparents

      This planet was an immigrant; to deport it’s an offense

      It’s an upstanding member of the solar system

      Apply the laws of Earth and make it a victim

      Of Proposition 187

      When Pluto spawns a moon it will apply to the heavens

      I’ll damn thee like Judas of Iscariot

      If you demote this mote remote to affiliate

      It’s like taking ET’s custody from Elliot

      Support your Lilliput, 'cause simply put

      Pluto is a planet. Pluto!

      Pluto is a planet. Pluto!

      Pluto is a planet. Pluto!

      Pluto is a planet. Pluto!

      Do it

      For the

      Children

      If not for yourself

      Pluto

      Is a

      2 Skinnee J’s - Pluto