I don’t understand why there’s no secondary option if Strait of Hormuz goes down. Obviously there are alternative routes out there but why big gas companies even governments did not see this coming. Are they okay losing billions? Or do they actually have a plan that ordinary people don’t know about?

  • Foni@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Don’t you remember the pandemic? It was something more or less predictable for which no government had anything like a plan, everyone panicked and started improvising like crazy.

    The explanation is very simple, we are idiots and we elected the most idiots among us to rule us

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep.

      If capitalism is calling the shots, then no one plans more than a fiscal quarter ahead of time.

      You can’t compete against someone that just ignores all risks, because if nothing goes wrong they put you out of business.

      And by the time something goes wrong, they have enough wealth and connections to get bailed out by governments.

      Because of that, every society that places capitalism above all else, will eventually implode. One day there just won’t be anything to bail them out with.

      It make sense for the oligarchs to keep making bets they can’t lose, but it means everyone else is forced to take bets we cant win.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Because of that, every society that places capitalism above all else, will eventually implode.

        This is just religious nut end-times doomerism.

        Also, your explaination literally doesn’t apply in this situation, since the people most impacted by the blockade are the petro-states of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, and Iraq. With the exception of Iraq, all of these countries are monarchies, with the royal families having significant control over oil production and benefitting from its profits. These are not publicly traded corporations with CEOs only concerned about next quarter’s bonus. They aren’t even socialist technocrats given a mandate to do what is best for the good of the people now and in the future. They are individuals who will be directly impacted by this blockade, who are looking not only to the benefit of oil weath in their own lives, but in the lives of their families far into the future. If anyone would have an incentive to take the long view, it would be petro-state monarchs who are, I must point out, not capitalists.

        So, no, this is not an example of the failures of capitalism. The far more obvious rationale is that (1) the future is hard to predict and (2) people are bad at planning.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well this is rich people being unaccountable to anything but foreign military realities. This is the union of corporate capitalism and a two tiered justice system which are both things that go hand in hand.

          When rich people feel invincible they do stupid shit. This is just human psychology.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        don’t blame capitalism. People are that shortsighted about everything. In your own niche you are not but I don’t have to know anything about you to state with 100% confidence that you have already been shortsited about something in your life.

        On the other hand you can’t do everything correctly - you don’t have enough time. You have to make hard choices about where you place the redundancey. Aften people focus an the last crisis and so they over invest in fire protection in the next house after a house burns - but the odds of a house fire are still low and they are likely putting less into the real next problem - whatever it will be.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          Preparing for worst case scenario is literally the only reason humans managed to make it thru 17 different ice ages chief…

          In times of plenty people who will take any risk do well, but winter always comes and those dumb fucks get killed off.

          It’s human variation.

          The problem is we’re letting people incapable of evaluating risk drive a globally connected society.

          Next time shit gets bad, there’s a real chance instead of a kingdom dissolving, virtually every living human dies, despite how personally risk averse they are.

          The problem is ultra capitalists being in charge of everything, not just that they exist on a fringe

          • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            But this isn’t worst case. Its something like 20% supply so things are more expensive for a while and for as long as people see this as a risk people will work to improve other transport options

            Also, here is a simple alternative view:

            You have a water tank that you share with a neighbour and a pipe you share to your house.

            A storm hits and the pipe is damaged.

            You both could have buried the pipe deeper, or made a backup pipe but you chose not to. Not a great capitalist failure: it’s thinking the risk wasn’t high so not spending your time on something you think you don’t need. You’re also not dying of thirst, you can still walk out and bucket water, it’s just slower and more problematic.

            Not a perfect analogy bit wow on parts of this thread

            • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              And in this case, I’m not convinced that the government setting prices and supplies, like in communism, would have helped since most people seemed to not think this was not a huge risk and really didn’t expect the US to ignore simulations and blaze ahead quite this unconcerned for negative outcomes.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Another way of saying it is that some things are so expensive you don’t do them even if they could be useful one day. Do you have a second house? Your first one could burn down. You don’t? I guess you must be a greedy capitalist thinking only about short term money.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    They’re not losing billions. They’re just selling less for more.

    The price increase is working for them, because it’s pretty certain that oil consumption is already decreasing with more cars and industries turning to electricity in the future anyway and supply is going to decrease as well. So this way, they already have customers accustomed to higher prices. Isn’t that neat…

  • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Renewable energy sources are purposefully unsubsidized to keep the world dependent on coal, oil, and fossil gas (they market it as natural gas) If they allowed for alternative energies, they’d lose footing as part of the interconnected system of ruling families known as the oligarchy. No progress will be made in the current system. Even climate change won’t be reversible until we’ve been heat-blasted for decades. It’s shameful and infuriating.

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean, we do. The world isn’t experiencing blackouts as a whole. We have alternative energy, generators, contingency plans, other oil suppliers, reserves, etc. It’s just that the largest trading route by far is currently not an option, so we’re feeling the squeeze from that.

  • disregardable@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you look at a map, that’s the most convenient and direct way for the oil to get out of that area. That whole region is mountainous. There are plenty of other ways to get oil, but it would take more than a few months to increase their supply.

    It’s like, imagine your local grocery store burnt down, and everyone in your neighborhood had to go to the next grocery store over. That grocery store would sell out of goods almost immediately, and you would just have to wait until they adjusted to increase their supply.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    There is no entity called “the world” that can flick through contingency plans. You can bet those who benefit from oil that would have sailed through the strait with no problem hadn’t the orange toddler started a war have a plan B. Whether that’s reactivating a few old pipelines or just sending ships the long way around, fuck knows. I’m not swimming in petrodollars. None of these plans will cost the same. All contingency plans cost more money. They might be raising fuel prices too much but they couldn’t not raise them at all.

    No one foresaw this development because it is - and that’s the diplomatic term for it: fucking stupid. And that’s why there isn’t a plan B in place that can be used in the same way right away.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t think Israeli government cares about this as long as they can bomb more children.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s no plan. Most states have strategic reserves of oil and gas, but that’s about it.

    Thankfully world shifts to renewables organically year by year.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      What most people aren’t aware of, is that those reserves are enough to keep the military running for like 3 days.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    shipping is way cheaper by ship. You can’t create new shipping lanes. rail and such would increase costs as is and no one would be using it when the straight is open. It would be unused infratstucture until this happens and then due to disuse it would not work.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    There are backup plans, they are just more costly. Big Gas companies will just pass that cost down the line. Trust me, those companies were never in danger of losing money.

  • starlinguk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    The oil companies made a backup plan, patented the hell out of everything and then shelved it. Source: I used to work for one.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      A patent means that a design is publicly published. If it was patented there would be designs that anyone could read and build for personal research. There would be YouTubers showing off their work. This happened 15 years ago when 3d printing was still under patent protection.

      China in general doesn’t care about US patents until they’re big enough to be sued. It would be on Aliexpress next to the retro game consoles that include hundreds of stolen roms.

      And Patents are only good for 20 years.

      So yeah, quit the bullshit. I’ve heard stories about miraculous inventions being patented and sat on by oil companies for 50 years. There’s no car that can run on water. They’re all scams that became urban legends.

  • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Canada should have pipelines and port facilities for shipping oil and gas all around the world

    But for some strange reason we don’t