• fitjazz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was just talking about this today with my wife’s family. We bought a whole house water filter from water filters of america and part of the reason we trusted them was their website. It looks like it is straight out of the early 2000s. We figured if they were scummy then they would put more effort into there site.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel safer when I see IFrames and text and blue (sometimes purple) links than I do when everything’s shiny and slidey and has an alpha of less than 255.

  • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reading blogs on bearblog.dev is an amazing experience. No algorithms, no discourse, no AI slop (I mean, hopefully 😬) and a majorly decreased amount of depressing world news.

  • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    3 days ago

    No one seems to know exactly what “modern” means when it comes to “modern design”. If you ask ten different developers, you get 11 different answers.

    My rule of thumb when I see “modern design” touted as a feature is that the developer chose form over function at every turn.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m pretty sure that whenever someone refers to “modern design” they mean winamp 3 skins, which came in all kinds of crazy shapes. Your imagination was the limit. Well, that and any technical limitations it had.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      That is a good definition. As an ex-website designer, I hate the new formats with their bloated flow and flashy appearance while the content is everywhere. Give me some tables and preloaded image sizes so the page loads fast and stops jumping all over the place.

      And they all look the same. Maybe because everyone just grabs the same template and there aren’t any out there actually trying new looks.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        YES! THANK YOU! I fucking hate these new website that look like they cost a million dollars to design, but they don’t function for crap, it’s hard to find the information I need, it jumps around while different “features” load, and keeps doing unexpected things while I scroll or hover over stuff.

        Give me a nice, clear side bar with submenus that make it easy to find what I’m looking for, and pages that load quickly and behave statically until I click on something.

        Fuck this emphasis on “modern” design. That’s just a bunch of self-fellating rich people getting off on marketing and sales pitches while ignoring user experience…

      • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        As a current web developer I’m with you except for the tables. I hate tables with a burning, fiery passion.

        I do like responsive design to account for mobile, tablet, and desktop so I try to blend that with classic “just works / just here for the data” layouts and generally minimize the flash in favor of the content. In other words, my projects go to a lot of work to look that simple lol.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I know, divs are better, and I did use them once they came about. But tables were what you used back in the beginning, had to.

          I appreciate responsive design, there’s some brilliant things out there. And I got out just as the whole smart phone thing started, and THAT was a nightmare that made the browser wars simple by comparison.

          • zout@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I remember tables, if you made the webpages in Publisher it would be tables all the way. I tought it was quite the thing back then, I guess 20-25 years ago?

      • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I cannot explain the amount of rage I experience when a website makes my scrollwheel do anything other than simply scrolling down, i.e. scrolling sideways or needlessly trying to do cool animations that just end up looking like shit

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        “just use tailwind” or any of the premade shit. It’s everywhere. Everything looks the same. I hate it.

        No one wants to design a website anymore. They just want to make one as fast as possible.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Modern design” somehow seems to mean “flat gray, bland logos, and simple block letters” to an unfortunate proportion of the marketing/design industry.

      Like why do so many companies spend millions on rebranding to these dull husks of what they were? Do they think that’s going to convince people to spend more money there?

      No one thinks “Oh look, Qdoba’s logo is much simpler and modern! I should eat there more often.” If anything it alienates the loyal customer base, like you see with the cracker barrel blowback (not that cracker barrel customers are worth their loyalty, but I digress).

      Billionaire shareholders and C-suite corpos are so out-of-touch it’s not even funny…

      • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And the trend of that same design trickling down to FOSS projects because “that’s what people want, apparently” is also (mildly) infuriating.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I notice FOSS tends to give you more options, because anyone can fork something or contribute to a project and add the features they want. Corporations try to force their “vision” on everyone who doesn’t want it, but FOSS projects let you own your own operating system and configure it how you want.

          Yeah, some of the bigger projects seem to follow corporate trends, because they’re mostly run by is non-profits very similarly to a corporation, and they need to appeal to a large base to get people to switch. Canonical even has for-profit motives, but if you’re not using Ubuntu/Gnome then you don’t need to give a shit what canonical does.

          I was originally going to choose Zorin, but I decided against it specifically because I didn’t want anything associated with Ubuntu. I considered LMDE, but I went with Endeavour and I’m happy with my choice.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    I also blame search engines. I type like “python file open parameters” and I really just want the official docs. They’re not even on the first page of DDG.

    • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yesterday, one of our new devs was struggling to get the page count of a word file in Python. I asked if he could just use an index from one of the existing libraries we’re using. He proceeded to search it on Bing and then waited for Copilot to generate slopcode at the top of the page. Shocked in horror, I asked, “Are you sure these are real functions?” He responded, I’m sure I can just copy and paste what I need. FML

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      6 Reddit threads, a bunch of YouTube videos of people with shocked faces (why are they surprised?), an AI summary that may discuss something related to your query or may talk about ways to get a snake to open its mouth, several articles, pretty much anything except the reference manual.

    • Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      On my free trial of kagi the official docs are the very first result without any lenses or settings. I will be buying subscription soon because while not always but sometimes the results are better by a long shot over ddg and google for me.

    • e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cloudhiker.net is another Stumbleupon clone. also Ye Olde Blogroll for finding indie blogs (blogroll.org)

      Micro.blog and bearblog.dev both have great communities too, if you’re into blogging.

      and finally: check out neocities, it’s like geocities but still alive

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I miss those silly Blogspot blogs with long-ass lists of friendly blogs. I used to add them all to my google reader and just get lost in its variety. Then tumblr came along and it partially took over the image part but after the porn ban debacle it wasn’t the same and there are not so many wacky blogs left out there.