• Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The side effects of such widespread gun usage in the US are a bummer, but at least that proliferation of guns protected your country from being overrun by a tyrannical facist government.

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Choose lead free ammunition”

    No?

    Just stop shooting guns and murdering things like a crazy ape?

    • Damarus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The American mind cannot comprehend this. Probably due to neurological symptoms from lead poisoning or sth

      • Pirat@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not sure if you’re American or not but here’s a question for you. These bald eagles are allegedly dying from lead poisoning from eating creatures shot by lead bullets/pellets. This must mean they are scavenging. Yes, I know bald eagles do that a lot but they also kill their own prey. So why aren’t vultures dying of this lead poisoning. Vultures only scavenge so it should happen much more often.

        Here’s another thought. 80% of eagles brought into a clinic may be dying of lead poisoning but that 80% is part of a small number overall. Notice they never say how many eagles are brought in.

        Here’s another thought for you: When someone says such and such is the fastest growing demographic for such and such a thing, it could just mean that there were very few such incidences. 2 such incidences occurred when there used to be just one. WOW! Hundred percent increase? Such incidences have DOUBLED!

        Don’t let Rita Skeeter twist your thoughts. Get the whole story.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Ingestion of lead ammunition is the primary reason California Condors (obligate carrion eaters) almost became extinct, are still endangered, and aren’t having the greatest success with being reintroduced.

          As for bald eagles, they’re lazy smart, if they see takeout just sitting there, they’re not gonna make dinner from scratch.

          • Pirat@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            Secondary reply: I don’t know If I’d call bald eagles smart. When I drive by a road kill that has vultures and a bald eagle feasting at it, the vultures fly away from the road while the stupid eagle flies right in front of my car. I’ve nearly had them smash into my windshield several times. It is now my standard reaction to slow down if I see a bald eagle eating road kill. I don’t worry about the vultures because they know what to do.

            BTW, bald eagles were nearly driven extinct by DDT. We quit using that so bald eagles are now numerous enough that I have to brake to keep from hitting while they eat road kill despite the lead poisoning.

          • Pirat@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Not denying the condor thing. Still didn’t answer the vulture thing. Yes, I know condors are a type of vulture but so are black vultures and turkey vultures which are more common than ever.

            • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              4 days ago

              A lot of wildlife rehabs don’t deal with the non-endangered or threatened birds. Several years ago a friend of mine found an injured bird of some sort and we called around trying to find help for it but all of the local rehabbers said if it wasn’t a bald eagle they couldn’t help. So because most vultures aren’t endangered afaik, they just die and probably nobody is keeping track.

        • Damarus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I couldn’t tell you and I don’t really care. Just jumping on the opportunity to mock gun culture

    • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 days ago

      The overwhelming majority of bullets are used against paper or steel targets. Most hunters take the entire carcass for butchering, so the eagles aren’t eating lead from animals shot and left in the wilderness. And given the volume needed, I wouldn’t be surprised that they’re eating fragments fired at steel targets that they mistake for rocks to keep in their stomach to grind up food.

      • zxqwas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 days ago

        Don’t know what they do over there, but we usually get the lungs and guts out as soon as possible in order to keep the meat from spoiling. Long lived predators that likes to scavenge can develop lead poisoning from those remains if it’s their main source of food.

        If confusing with rocks was the main source you’d expect it to be just as common in other birds.

          • zxqwas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            You tend to be generous with what you discard because you don’t want to eat lead.

            I could only find one report where they measured Pb in blood. People who self reported eating game meat in Utah had 30% higher lead levels than people who did not.

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s why I also mentioned to stop shooting guns. If you are shooting in such an unsafe way that fragments fly around and get lost, then you shouldn’t be allowed to shoot in the first place.

        • kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          4 days ago

          You’re not familiar with the concept of an outdoor target range, are you?

              • Solumbran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Yes, if there are bullets or parts of metal that fly randomly, it is always going to be a hazard. Even without lead poisoning, I don’t believe that chunks of metal in the digestive system would be good for this bird, or any other animal. And what is the point, what good does a stupid outdoors gun range bring? Even if you think that it’s fine for people to learn how to be better at shooting deadly weapons, what does an outdoors setting bring other than risks?

                • ebolapie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  They’re cheaper to build and maintain, they’re more robust, they’re more dispersed, they can accommodate longer ranges, and they’re less restrictive on types of ammunition and types of firearms.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      We killed the predators on a lot of our continent. Deer hunting is ecologically necessary here. And thats before we get into the boar problem

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, and you all understand just how controversial it is to do as well, considering that reintroducing predators is something people are trying on both our continents. Reintroducing wolves to the forests of the eastern united states may happen in my lifetime but is unlikely as the people who live where they would be enjoy hunting for meat and don’t like the idea of having to shoot wolves that get too bold. They’re currently controversially being reintroduced in the West like near Yellowstone. Other predators like cougars also need to be allowed to populate more. Even then though, nothing on this continent but humans is taking down boars. They’re giant and massively invasive, an ecological calamity.

          But for the time being, hunters should be switching to lead free shot, and they should continue hunting white tail deer. Target shooters should also be using lead free shot, in general if you don’t want particles of it in your bloodstream don’t shoot with it.

        • qaeta@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          The wolves were driven off for a reason. They had a tendency to snack on pets, livestock and small children until they learned to fear us. Those issues all come back if they stop fearing us again.

          • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Coyotes are also present in many places in the US, and birds of prey can harm pets too.

            No excuse for eliminating a healthy and necessary species from the ecology. Human ego trumps all

            • qaeta@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Cool, latch on the least important reason we did it and ignore the others while acting like you’re somehow superior for doing so I guess.

    • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I think you might have some ontologically incongruous standards. We are crazy apes. You can take the guns away, but the murder will persist for millennia, if not gene edited out. Banning the guns and lead bullets is more likely to work than expecting humanity to spontaneously diverge from its evolutionary roots as a bang bus murder ape

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t know, humans are good at diverging from their instincts when it comes to letting sick people die, but when it comes to killing less, they cannot anymore?

        I think that low-ass standards are what prevent humans from getting any better, if you start justifying mindless murders as “just instinct” then of course people will be fine with it. And funnily enough, that’s one of the main arguments that hunters use, saying that they’re just doing something “natural”.

        • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          We are killing less. And overwhelmingly so. If you don’t count faceless, recontectualized packaged cow, chicken, and pig meat. We’re also still pretty good about keeping our close group alive, but medicine men, insurance, and numbers over 100 are a strictly cultural practice not cemented within our genetic memory in any helpful way, so society as a whole suffers under the burden of our limited empathy.

          You can also get into the economics of governance to get a good look at what it would mean to move the systems in place enough to reach the sort of universal socioeconomic safety that you’d personally find acceptable. I’m a fan of Europe’s deal… up to a point.

          I really don’t mean to cut things off, but the scope of this conversation would necessarily reach so incredibly wide that I don’t believe I can keep your attention or mine for a dozen pages of philosophy, biology, anthropology, history, psychology, and economics. In short, I, personally, can only expect people to fit neatly into a groove so long as it isn’t too far removed from the one we dug a hundred thousand years ago. Certain people have done too much to remove themselves, and to some degree us, from personal responsibility in the US to do anything but set fire to what we have.

  • jbellows@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    I read this twice. I’m trying to comprehend. The problem, I think I comprehend absolutely perfectly but my soul doesn’t want to. Am this close to screaming until hoarse and sweaty. Am at work so will see if I need to do this in the parking lot.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I dream sometimes of all the regressives in the world getting into a rocket ship and blasting off for some fantasy Planet B, leaving the progressives behind to clean up the mess.

      And we do, and it’s terrible, but slowly the world heals.

      Then the regressives realize that Planet B is too far away, and that Earth is actually faring pretty well now, and they try to come back.

      When we don’t let them set foot on Earth, they promise to nuke us from space, and then there’s this standoff with them in orbit pointing a weapon at the only place that can support their progeny.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ban lead bullets then. Allows people to keep hunting while preventing more pollution in the wild.

    Plenty of time after that to ban other things.

    • musubibreakfast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s a very un-American solution. I think it would be much better to sell fire arms to eagles so they become aware of the problem and they can effectively hunt fresh prey and thereby circumvent the entire issue.