• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    6 days ago

    Harris chose to lose the most winnable election in history because Democrats know they can punish voters for being disloyal simply by allowing Republicans to win. If you demand too much from Democrats they will throw the election. It’s essentially a hostage situation, you must give unconditional support to the Good Cop or the Bad Cop will beat you to death. You don’t want the Bad Cop, do you?

    If we don’t abolish this system we’re all going to die.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        Trump only got 49.9% of the vote. He has never been popular, even by capitalizing on disgust with liberals. It really wasn’t his election to lose, he’s not actually a strong candidate. He won by playing against an opponent that doesn’t want to win.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Trump only got 49.9% of the vote. He has never been popular,

          Idk about you, but 49.9% of the vote sounds very popular to me.

          Hell 10% sounds popular.

          I don’t think the issue is his popularity. He’s definitely popular

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Far be it from me to argue against the US being a backwards shithole racist country, because it obviously is and death to Amerikkka, but I don’t like the narrative that he had some kind of mandate to govern because he is so popular. He really doesn’t. He’s started without a majority and it’s been down hill ever since.

            By the by, that’s just of the people who bothered to vote. If we counted non-voters, he got 32%

      • monkeyjoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        And the fact is that you tell people this, verifiable fact, and they get mad and stick fingers in their ears. They really want to lose.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          I remember debates on Reddit. I kept pointing out that the official inflation figures fail to measure the pain people were figuring. But I just got downvoted to Hell by a bunch of troglodytes mindlessly parroting the CPI figures, as if that was the only thing that matters.

          There is a severe strain of Orwellian magical thinking among liberals. Speak no evil, see no evil, hear no evil. Ignore all bad news and try to give your way to victory.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      No matter how it might appear, the DNC didn’t fucking throw the election. Jesus Christ, who upvotes this shit?

      Terminally online leftists need to get out and touch grass. No party will ever pander to you because not only is your bloc essentially nonexistent in the US, but you literally have no fucking idea how any of this shit actually works in real life.

      If you think that the Democratic party is losing elections on purpose as a “fuck you” to voters, you are delusionally stupid.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        The only other reasonable explanation is that they’re too stupid and don’t know how to win elections.

        If you think that the Democratic party are stupid, you are delusional.

      • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        They refuse to campaign on popular policies even when it increases their chances of losing because it doing otherwise would anger their donors. They know it might cause them to lose. It’s purposeful. What else do you call that?

      • chloroken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Ableist Liberal poster named “prole” trying to lecture leftists about politics. Perfect. No notes.

    • Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      I doubt it. Trump got those votes regardless of what Harris could’ve done.

      People want to be openly racist and homophobic.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The reason Harris lost is because people who voted for Biden in 2020 stayed home and because fewer young people voted than in previous elections, not because they voted for Trump. Democratic turnout fell by 2 million votes.

        • Paddzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Would it have made a difference and out weighed the racism votes? After brexiit, I’ll n never underestimate the power of hate.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            By the numbers, yes. Trump’s turnout increased by 1 million, Democrats decreased by 2 million, and the loss of Democrat turnout was what pushed Trump over the edge. He still only got 49.9% of the vote, after all.