• socphoenix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    3 months ago

    To be fair, the road design is literal highways all the way around it making it impossible to safely walk. It’s terrible design and super hazardous to pedestrians but there is a safety reason behind the rule.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      They should have been required to build pedestrian bridges and paths. If we didn’t line in a shithole capitalist hellhole.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, there’s a bridge right there. Hang a pedestrian walkway underneath. Plenty of bridges like that where it’s been added after the fact.

        But we know, it’ll see roughly 12 people a year actually use it because they’re Americans.

      • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        The decision to build a stadium that is completely inaccessible without a vehicle, even if you are staying at a hotel next door, is the point.

      • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        For at least a few decades, I’ve been hearing complaints about American city planning intentionally excluding people who choose to, or can do nothing but, walk. Making it mandatory to arrive via automobile, that’s what they’re complaining about.

        The first I’d heard of this was a rich area in socal being completely inaccessible to the homeless because it was rimmed entirely by freeways. No way to leave or enter safely without a car and few groceries just outside. A local food desert. Or a food fort

        With that said, half of MetLife’s exterior is walkable, according to some maps. A long walk around a freeway is part of it. I’m not a fan of an extra 10 minutes of walking with industrial scenery but it seems fine enough

  • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m glad my cities stadium is built on top of a train station. And that they close lanes of the surrounding roads for pedestrians to walk on when there’s a big match

  • FluxUniversity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    fuck that

    Why would anyone want to go somewhere where its illegal to walk outside?

    No, its not illegal to walk outside. You’re allowed to walk through public spaces.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    North Jersey is a wild sprawl of highways. It’s a shame it’s not more pedestrian friendly.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lol, US things 🤷

    (Don’t hate! It really is a deeply US thing. We’re a very car Country as Germany but a thing like that would be totally alien to us.)

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I came down with the flu and 102° fever while on a work trip this week. I ubered to an urgent care and the pharmacy was just across the street, but the street being a typical 5-lane American road with no sidewalk on either side, and no pedestrian crossing in sight in either direction.

    I had to play frogger in the traffic standing in an empty lane until the next one cleared to get across.

    Just truly mind-blowing bad design