In the recording, the mother of two can be heard discussing with her staff the success of a TPUSA event and the strong sales of associated merchandise. She then appeared to dismiss her husband’s death during the discussion while emphasizing harmony between staff.
It’s not this audio that exposed her as a psychopath, it’s every singe public appearance she’s made since his death. Without skipping a beat she capitalized on her husband’s assassination immediately after it happened. Organizing events, “fundraisers”, podcasts, hook ups with the vice president, twitter beef with other grifters doing the same, etc, etc.
I’m never going to tell anyone how to grieve but you can’t convince me someone this excited about her husband’s public execution is grieving
Shitbag man has shitbag wife. More at 11.
I’m getting you fired. That was literally my favorite racist podcaster.
Ok but imagine charlie kirk is your husband and he dies. You’d be happy, too.
Feels like acceptance came first, if not prior.
Conservatives completely lack empathy, but she seems to completely lack all emotions.
Giggling about her husband’s death is a sign of emotion.
That could have been the “cha-ching” of the grift
Is greed an émotion?
Greed itself might not be, but that what makes you go “cha-ching” when profiting from greed totally is.
To be fair, I giggled at his death too
Sounds like we might have a motive for Charlie’s death.
My theory, Charlie wasn’t always great to her and she is happy he is gone but not willing to admit that his misogyny actually hurt her at times.
That’s a very charitable interpretation.
or maybe maybe she 's glad to be the new boss of her husband empire and nothing to do with how she was treated. Also charlie said multiple time that she had worse opinion than him, notably on women role and feminity.
… Because women are pure and would never ever be selfish or duplicitous. Unlike all men. amiright?
I never meant to imply that in my comment.
I believe you. Now, in re-reading it, can you see any implicit bias in the statement? That is what i was being sarcastic about.
It was not an attack on you, though it’s easy to read that into text without any physical cues. It’s an unfortunate side effect of the media.
Dumb comment, she’s obviously a nasty person, doesn’t mean he wasn’t abusive, given his politics the chances are high enough
I was not commenting on her,or on kirk, though I have my opinions. I was bringing attention to the gender bias that by default, women are assumed to be “good” in the face of evidence to the contrary. Worse she’s not accountable for the behavior because a man might have been abusing her.
She might have very good reasons and intentions. She might be putting up a brave and strong show to shift focus on a cause she truly embraces.
The point is we don’t know, but we have a demeanor that implies something might be askance and the comment didn’t address the behavior. It fell on favorable assumptions about the gender that (I feel) would not have been applicable to a man in the same scenario. Basically, a subtle logical fallacy that warps judgment subtly.
But then she runs right to ‘JD Vance’. She’s a grifter
Wow well I guess marrying a Mossad honey pot is a bad idea
Quick someone save Kash Patel!
…actually nah it’s fine.
I couldn’t find anything about her links to Mossad online. Source?
Her husband getting a hole through the neck was the event of the century for her too?
Looks like I have something in common with Erika Kuck.
I think Trump’s death has ‘event of the century’ locked in for me — but hey, at least there’s proof she’s a fucking ghoul.
I’m no conspiracy theorist but there is apparently a cia training video out there with Erika Kirk in it…she was just his handler y’all
Though at this point that actually sounds plausible, it’s still rather conspiratorial at the least.
Having said that, yeah it wouldn’t surprise me
What we VAN all agree on is that this bitch is one cold narcissistic psychopath. It’s almost enough to feel sorry for Charlie. Almost… But not.
Indeed we van
Cmon We all knew she was fucked up sociopath.
Exactly…nothing surprising here.
The list of articles at the end is just Candace Owens talking about other conspiracy theories. This isn’t news, why are you wasting peoples time with this? And why are people upvoting this?
Very likely they’re just reading the lemmy headline, upvoting and moving on without opening thread or link. Just the nature of link aggregator sites
Are you trying to say ‘theblast.com’ is not hard hitting journalism?
+1
Also, information hygiene on Lemmy is awful. Posters don’t check sources or click through to original sources. They repost tabloids without even blinking. And mods do basically no policing of that; not even a suggestion in the postings rules.
(And I don’t mean to single out OP or the community here. That’s just kinda how Lemmy is at the moment).
Yeah, the article ain’t great, however, the tapes she leaked and the general sentiment are crazy.
Hasan did a segment on it yesterday and hearing her actually giggling with excitement and telling staff they’re not getting any time off and that Charlie is up in heaven wanting them to work harder was something else.
Agreed. This is just Candace Owens trash.
Psycho bitch.
Great songs!
A good magahat never lets a tragedy and grief get in the way of turning a profit. I too am impressed by the profits made…
Lots of people were happy he died, why are people mad at her?
Her kids are going to need a lot of therapy.
