In the recording, the mother of two can be heard discussing with her staff the success of a TPUSA event and the strong sales of associated merchandise. She then appeared to dismiss her husband’s death during the discussion while emphasizing harmony between staff.
My theory, Charlie wasn’t always great to her and she is happy he is gone but not willing to admit that his misogyny actually hurt her at times.
That’s a very charitable interpretation.
… Because women are pure and would never ever be selfish or duplicitous. Unlike all men. amiright?
I never meant to imply that in my comment.
I believe you. Now, in re-reading it, can you see any implicit bias in the statement? That is what i was being sarcastic about.
It was not an attack on you, though it’s easy to read that into text without any physical cues. It’s an unfortunate side effect of the media.
Dumb comment, she’s obviously a nasty person, doesn’t mean he wasn’t abusive, given his politics the chances are high enough
I was not commenting on her,or on kirk, though I have my opinions. I was bringing attention to the gender bias that by default, women are assumed to be “good” in the face of evidence to the contrary. Worse she’s not accountable for the behavior because a man might have been abusing her.
She might have very good reasons and intentions. She might be putting up a brave and strong show to shift focus on a cause she truly embraces.
The point is we don’t know, but we have a demeanor that implies something might be askance and the comment didn’t address the behavior. It fell on favorable assumptions about the gender that (I feel) would not have been applicable to a man in the same scenario. Basically, a subtle logical fallacy that warps judgment subtly.
or maybe maybe she 's glad to be the new boss of her husband empire and nothing to do with how she was treated. Also charlie said multiple time that she had worse opinion than him, notably on women role and feminity.
But then she runs right to ‘JD Vance’. She’s a grifter