• TheFederatedPipe@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 days ago

    It really is! I was off for about three months, and I decided to go back to it just to be up-to-date with some friends and creators, right? Well, I was doom-scrolling for hours in about just a week of usage. Whenever that happens, I uninstall the app causing it, so I just deleted it again. The craziest part? After a couple of hours, I could feel the craving to open the app. Crazy shit.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 days ago

    Disable YT history. Make YT Subscriptions page your home page. Now all you see are the most recent videos from your subscribed channels. You can keep up with them without being distracted by garbage suggestions. It’s a much better experience.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        I just block the side-bar using Ublock Origin. Makes more room on the page and im not sold shit. If I want random videos ill hit the home page the post-screen after a video.

        Keeps my time down on the site by a lot.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t know man… I found so many nice channels randomly… Kurzgesagt, science asylum so many great educational channels that just pop up

      • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Just remember they are education and entertainment, don’t binge watch them like I did

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s okay though because Zuck greased the Trump admin’s palms with his Presidential Library bribe, so they’ll get a slap on the wrist at best.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 days ago

    Fucking GOOD. We need these useless companies to fail out and be held responsible for their actions.

  • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 days ago

    That lawsuit documents the case of a 19-year-old, K.G.M, who hopes the jury will agree that Meta and YouTube caused psychological harm by designing features like infinite scroll and autoplay to push her down a path that she alleged triggered depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidality.

    What the hell is everyone watching? YT recommends me Red Letter Media, Veratasium, old movies, Blender tutorials and a bunch of other stuff that’s never going to drive me to self-harm. I don’t understand. May be this woman doesn’t have ad blocker installed and is forced to sit through a bunch of soul crushing PSAs? Why is my experience so drastically different from this?

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Algorithms try to push body negativity if it thinks you’re a teen girl because they tend to scroll more and buy more when depressed.

      If it thinks you’re a single man then it tries to push manosphere stuff.

      On YouTube I find I my relevant suggestions last about a month before I have to mark a bunch of videos as not interested or block a bunch of channels.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yeah there was a period where it noticed I watched a few trans youtubers and so it started promoting anti trans content, it was around the election (I forget if before or after), but either way it disgusted me that they’d do that

      • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        Algorithms aren’t that smart. Maybe there needs to be general education about how they work so people will understand that viewing a video is like searching for a topic in google so people will understand how much control over what they see and use the technology appropriately.

        If you watch a video about anorexia that’s like typing “Anorexia” in Google or pressing 9 on a remote control, you’re getting channel 9. That’s why to me this sounds crazy. It’s like someone complaining their TV keeps pushing the cooking channel at them.

          • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Sure, google knows I’m a 50+ year old man but YT isn’t pushing me a bunch of videos about retirement and how to keep the damn kids off my lawn. If I made a new account and it knew nothing about me, it might. But right now it knows I’m interested in obscure early 20th Century comic books and early 70s horror anthology shows.

            Edit:

            I misunderstood what you said. I use ad blocker so I don’t see ads. Sometimes they get through and it’s always Wix. That is kind of a mystery to me.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        My youtube is used exclusively by my toddler, with me seeing about 10 videos a month. It pushes me AI generated sprunky and brainrot bullshit.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Watching those hack frauds causes psychological harm. Rich Evans is known to trigger depression

    • thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Sounds like you consume useful information. I wager she uses socials as many: to compare herself to others, perusing a mix of ego-affirming and ego-damning content. These are powerful emotional hooks and oscillating between those states can be confounding. Add a dash of fatalism, which is not hard to come by in this culture, when at a low, and I think it easy to see how one might capitulate.

      There are a lot of people out there that think their personality traits are inherent and that their physical attributes are static. In fact, my brother was one of these people, to an extent. He passed away at 40 years old due to morbid obesity. I attribute his downfall to capitulation by way of comparison. He came to think the hole was too big and that his genetics were too poor to make changes, despite me providing an example to the contrary. Sadly, my parents fanned the flames of his dissonance with their own identity-bound delusions.

      So, my guess is that you have developed a healthy personal philosophy and have not surrounded yourself with the type of people or digital content that renders that philosophy dissonant.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        But it should also be noted, teenagers are particularly targeted by and vulnerable to such messaging. In my 30s I can look around and see the evidence against such comparisons, but at 16 I was just some kid who worried she’d never be attractive or well liked. Had I been in spaces that encouraged such attitudes such as Instagram or 4chan I would have been really vulnerable to it.

        Young people are often overly worried about such things because adolescence is a difficult and transitory stage where these worries are developmentally appropriate. They’re supposed to have adults who can help them deal with this, and peers that they can learn by interacting with, but it’s normal to not believe your parents on such issues and interactions with peers has been moved online with social media and there’s little interaction with adults. This has led room for teenagers to be preyed on by algorithms that encourage their worst instincts and online communities that teach anything from antisocial behavior to masochistic epistemology.

  • vogo13@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 days ago

    Facebook helped to cause Arab Spring. These platforms are responsible for the destruction of civilization under the guise of “connecting everyone”.

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 days ago

      These platforms are responsible for the destruction of civilization under the guise of “connecting everyone”.

      CA discovered how to “hack” people’s minds, then maybe the Russians and Chinese figured it out, and the oligarchy and the lunatic fringe want all in to brainwash the world.

      Makes me angry knowing that at anytime a bigger war could break out.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        As far as I can tell, advertisement/profit-driven social media that is directly tied to your real identity might actually be the worst thing humanity has ever invented.

        Oops!

        Turns out we’re mostly vain and stupid, in our default state.

        Now amplify.

        Oh and as a bonus:

        It serves as a kind of self perpetuating auto-panopticon.

        It never ceases to amaze me how many people just record thems committing, planning to commit, bragging about committing, or admitting to commiting crimes that can put you away for 5 years plus… on fucking TikTok.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I wouldn’t use Arab springs as an example of why Facebook is not a good product. Facebook has many problems and misuses, but I would not list allowing people to organise as one of them.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Hey wow its like I’ve been saying that for a decade, but because I’m poor and I say that, clearly I am some kind of antisocial insane person, not somebody who can read a bunch of existing studies and data and form a conclusion.

    Corporation would never gaslight you!

    … unless you deserved it.

  • Affidavit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    What a bunch of nonsensical slop.

    Can we please hate billionaires without being absolute nincompoops?

    Please? You people are really making us look like fucking idiots.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    IG is 100% not a drug.

    And those of y’all who are promoting this pseudo-science are part of the problem. Look at what y’all did to TikTok. Wacky liberal lemmings handing the internet over to literal fascists.

    Literally nobody mentioning what happened to TikTok after that sinophobic pogram. Peeps are just excited for round 2.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/29/palestinian-journalist-bisan-owda-with-1-4m-followers-reports-tiktok-ban

    • Pauce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      How is it psuedo science to compare the addicting ways social media affects people and its similarity to drug addiction? It’s an analogy, obviously no one is being 100% literal.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        “IG is a drug”

        This is not just pseudo-science. It’s literally a false statement. Maybe it’s a metaphor but science is not a metaphor. Metaphor’s are generally a bad foundation for actions based on reality.

        It’s ok if people want to compare “social media” to a drug, but there’s any meaningful evidence for those claims either so that’s pseudo-science too. Notice how all the arguments against “social media” here are based on feelings, stories, etc. while there’s zero scientific evidence.

        • jve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          This is not just pseudo-science.

          This was a quote from internal memos you dolt.

          That they thought this way, and treated it this way, and leaned into it, is the problem.

        • LeoshenkuoDaSimpli@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          Both electronic media (social media, apps) and cigarettes act as quick-hit, artificial sources of dopamine, the brain’s “feel-good” neurotransmitter, which can lead to addiction. Cigarettes/vapes release dopamine through nicotine, while digital media does so through notifications and content, both hijacking the brain’s reward system to create compulsive, repetitive behaviors.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I, too, am distraught to see mildly conservative leaning independent tech branches of society be cancelled in extremely inopportune political times and maybe fall into hands of fascists.

      But claiming ig is 100% not a drug is not the way.

      Ig is kinda shitty and meta absolutely has fallen into that political trap. “Who’s to say how they would behave if we were under left rule, and not far right?”

      Tiktok, I’m sad about. It truly was a real haven for many. I didn’t use insta, though, I’m too old.

      I don’t think giving these tech programs into the hands of evil is the right move. But imagine if musk bought meta after a public shaming.

      The world is largely headed that way, anyway. And we just have to deal with it. Maga and natsoc is cancer and should be feared and hated and fought as such. In that sense, judging correctly if meta has been infected/is lost/will be lost, is the correct course of action as a preliminary, and further actions stemming from that result. With “this app is addictive and manipulative and influential” being important, but not as.

      If we want to win against fascism, unfortunately, they’re playing ball and we’re standing in the field shitting our pants and trying to smell the flowers.