• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    9 days ago

    The document describes a mechanism resembling the “purchase” of influence: standard membership in the Board of Peace is limited to three years and depends on the will of the chairman. This restriction is lifted for states that contribute more than US$1 billion in cash to the fund within the first year.

    “Decisions would be taken by a majority, with each member state present getting one vote, but all would be subject to the chairman’s approval,” Bloomberg says.

    Pay a billion to get a vote, and everyone gets a vote…

    But trump can overrule any vote…

    And he can kick anyone out that he wants, so if you ever go against his opinion of the moment, he’ll kick you out.

    Why the fuck would any country pay this?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    9 days ago

    So a protection racket, in other words.

    Setup by the dollar store godfather wannabe

    Ever since trump got elected, the news has been either bizarre, devastating, hilarious, insane, removed, cringe, maddening…

    Can that heart attack come already? Come on, McDonald’s hamburgers, do your job

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Absolutely fucking terrible protection racket if that’s what it is.

      The US spends 7tn per year on government spending. Even if the entire UN ponied up a billion each, every year, that would be less than 200bn in additional revenue. Not nothing, but barely a fraction of the 5tn in tax revenue the US government takes in every year.

      That’s like the mafia hitting you up for $50 a month.

    • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      We are in hell.

      Always was, just this time Trumpler is exacerbating the overall situation - essentially driving us deeper into the underworld.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Outside of the overt extortion for entry bit, how would this be any different than the current UN where the US unilaterally controls basically every decision or its consequences?

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      It’s called the board of peace so we can assume it will be a global Mafia demanding protection money, and going to war whenever it’s the more profitable outcome.

      The kind of group that should be nuked from orbit.

    • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s his same old song. Tear down what already exists, then huck a new version of it out for the very low price of $19.84.

      I’m surprised he hasn’t added his name to the title of it yet.

    • Vikthor@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 days ago

      UN SC is not unilaterally controlled by the US, other permanent members get a veto too. That’s why he would like to replace that.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 days ago

    Trump doesn’t honor any agreement he signs,why would anyone be stupid enough to agree to this.

    He will just keep increasing the price.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nonsense. The price is firm. It’s two billion dollars and not one cent more. And that’s pretty cheap. Three billion, for such a good protection service? Very cheap! Just five billion!

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 days ago

    On Friday, the White House presented the composition of “a founding Executive Board”, consisting exclusively of figures loyal to Trump: his Middle East adviser Steve Witkoff, his son-in-law Jared Kushner, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and former UK prime minister Tony Blair.

    It’s astonishing how often Tony Blair manages to find new ways to be a massive fucking disappointment. It’s like he’s already concluded that he’s going to hell for the whole Iraq thing so he’d may as well lean into it by being a huge cunt while he’s alive.

    • TBi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      I thought the same thing. I mean the whole Iraq thing could be seen as a misjudgement in hindsight. Now though he just looks evil.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 days ago

    The words in the picture are wrong. It should be:
    I’m going to build my own UN with
    little children and more little children!

  • DarkDinner@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 days ago

    Every pro Trumper I know also has a deep fear of the UN or some shadowy organisation controlling the world. Every conversation ended up with “Well at least he will take back power from the elites”. Now Trump declares he wants to rule the world, and outlines their exact fears as his plan and they are silent. No comment. Why are people so stupid? And pathetically so. It not even hard to see how ridiculous this guy is, but people are still bowing down to it.

      • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        And it won’t be by GDP either. He will ask the exact same amount from each country. If you’re too small to pay, you get conquered