• WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    227
    ·
    20 days ago

    Which is a violation of his oath of office, which is ample grounds for impeachment.

    Shame that Congress is full of feckless cowards

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 days ago

      I dont think theyre cowards per se. I think this is how the “democracy” is intended to work?

      Trump looks after oligarchs, oligarchs make donations to campaigns to get senators elected, senators support Trump.

      Its not so much that theyre cowards, theyre just serving the people who got them elected, and thats not the voters.

  • Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    20 days ago

    Cool. What of it then? I get it, but it doesn’t really mean anything if accountability is optional nowadays.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    20 days ago

    315 grants were terminated in October, ending support for 223 projects worth approximately $7.5 billion,

    Deciding that the government had violated grantees’ rights to equal protection, Mehta only ordered a return to the status quo, reinstating seven grants totaling $27.6 million.

    Let’s be clear, that’s $27.6 million out of $7,500 million. 99.6% of the cuts still go through.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah, from the article, it sounds like only a few organizations were in the lawsuit. They’re the only ones the judge ordered restored.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    20 days ago

    Not an american but is the famous american “checks and balances” need to be turned off and on again or smt? It doesn’t seem to be working.

    • Ach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’m American and I’m not convinced it was ever turned on. Pretty sure it was theorized and marketed well and all of you believed it as much as we did.

    • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 days ago

      Checks and balances is working exactly as the founding fathers envisioned.

      …by cashing checks and hoarding balances.

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        The founders were mostly slave/land owning robber barons. Washington was one of the most wealthiest people in the colonies…

        • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 days ago

          Yeah the only reason they didn’t want to remain a colony was because they thought they could become more wealthy personally breaking off from the British empire, seizing more land from the natives, and taking more land from Britain’s other colony of Canada.

          Then bind all the states and their settlers and natives by saddling them with national debt to lock them into a unfettered capitalist experiment on an unexploited resource rich land with the moral framework of civilising and subsuming the native population.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 days ago

      The “checks and balances” depend on putting ambitious people in different parts of the government, and giving them competing roles. Then, naturally, excesses get curbed because no one part of the government would want to cede too much of its power to the other.

      It did not forsee a future where the leaders of the other co-equal branches of government would subjugate themselves to the President’s ego.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      It’s definitely not working now. It got destroyed after 9/11 - Bush was only too happy about the opportunity to make some changes that had already been waiting in a drawer for who knows how many years - and it’s honestly a miracle it took so long for someone to exploit its absence to its fullest extent.

      But arguably it all went downhill long before Bush.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      The checks and balances are working mostly as intended. The purpose of the system is:

      1. Protect the oligarchy from external threats, should any anti-oligarch politician slip by all the various election disenfranchisement techniques,
      2. Moderate any conflicts between factions of the oligarchy to stabilize the dictatorship of the capital.

      As far as I can tell,

      1. Billionaires are making more billions every day while the rest struggle to get by,
      2. Almost all dem politicians and their wealthy neoliberal donors are doing alright despite a literal fascist party being in power.

      Besides, even when someone like Mamdani gets elected, they can’t effect any meaningful change because they are “checked” by the pro-capitalist legislature and “balanced” by the corrupt judiciary.

      It doesn’t need a reboot, it needs a complete realignment of who’s in charge.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’ve under taken the arduous trip and located the answer. To save you the trouble, I’ve drawn a map.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    20 days ago

    Incoming Truth Social post…

    “This PROVES that Demonrat states are run by crooks, because only criminals use the Fifth Amendment!”

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 days ago

    I wish the media stop addressing him as President for the rest of his term he only cares about his ego and white supremacy. Trump has show something being illegal doesn’t matter if you just don’t care.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 days ago

    Trump’s violated so many laws and under aged women and got no consequences so why would he stop?

      • Rhoeri@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        You can expect this behavior from an orange ghoul. Calling him a man insinuates that he is supposed to be better than this- which makes it worse.