• Dymonika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Anyone who wants to try Linux but is scared of or reluctant about anything about the process at all: talk to me! There are multiple ways to try it with zero change to your system, like Oracle VirtualBox or a USB flash drive.

    • ChogChog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      This really stuck with me. “Rewrote” implies feature parity. What they really did was replace the taskbar.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    In Windows 10, you could move it to the top, left, or right of the screen.

    In every version of Windows up until now which has contained a taskbar and start menu, as far back as Windows 95. Not just Windows 10. Let’s not sell short the full extent idiocy on display, here.

    “Pouring its engineering resources,” my ass.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      6 days ago

      In the launch version of windows 11 and for over TWO YEARS it didn’t even support drag&drop. It was working fine even on windows me

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        6 days ago

        Drag and drop worked on windows 3.1. That was like the whole thing. “LOOK WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW!”

        At this point, I’m fairly sure pissing people off is the point with Windows 11. It’s full of AI no one wants, refuses to officially run on most hardware that people already have, despite running just fine on that same hardware UNofficially, dropped support for drag and drop, doesn’t let you move the taskbar.

        And thats not even to mention the fact that it monitors you, and reports back to HQ with screen grabs and usage activity.

        Oh look, ZorinOS, just one singular distro, had 1.6 million downloads in the past 2 months.

        Wait, is there any special thing that happened 2 months ago? Oh right. Windows 10 support ended, and microsoft told its userbase “fuck you, you can’t get support for windows 10, and this computer can’t update to windows 11. This computer is now trash!”

        Suddenly all these youtube videos pop up “Is your PC unable to install windows 11? Try linux!”

        And these videos don’t try to sway you to one distro or another. They point out a few big hitters like mint or ubuntu. I can’t imagine them specifically naming zorin, unless it’s a zorin centric video. But I’m talking about the flood of “try linux” videos that popped up in October.

        And that 1.6 million is JUST zorin. That’s the runoff. I don’t have numbers, or sources, but gut instinct tells me that if Zorin had 1.6 million downloads, Mint must have had like 5 million minimum. Every video always reccomends Mint. It’s probably overtaken Ubuntu at some point as most used distro.

        And all of this, every single bit of user loss has NOTHING to do with linux. Users are angrily switching. Not happily. They feel abandoned, and forced to switch.

        If Microsoft either extended Windows 10 support, or allowed Windows 11 to be installed on reasonable hardware, this linux boom DOES NOT HAPPEN. This is Microsoft saying “Yeah bitch, money is tight! Go buy another computer, loser! You’ll do what we say, and there’s nothing you can do to stop us!”

        That’s when users switched to linux. This is pure hubris from Microsoft. It would be interesting if somehow we could get a combined number of EVERY distros doenload numbers.

        • anon5621@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          It also has a very poorly written UI interface that’s fucking infuriating. I was reverse engineering it to figure out why it’s so damn slow on HDDs, with explorer.exe rendering like shit, the Start menu crawling, and taskbar popups that make you want to smash your screen. They wrote really really fucking bad code compared to the Win7 days—basically just took the old MFC crap and slapped a XAML wrapper on it to make it look “nice.” What a fucking disaster.

          • felbane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I read some article or saw some video claiming that explorer was basically a react app now, which is why unlocking the screen takes 3.5 business days when you enter the correct password.

      • hikaru755@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Uh, what? Can you clarify what you mean by “drag&drop”? Because dragging and dropping files or text around within or between application windows definitely worked even when Win 11 was new, so you’re probably talking about some specific instance, I assume?

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 days ago

          The taskbar on windows 11 for the first two years didn’t support dragging and dropping on icons or opened applications. It was completely unusable

          • hikaru755@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Ah, okay, gotcha. Yeah that’s fair. Not something I’ve ever really used, so wasn’t aware of that. Your comment read to me as if Windows as a whole just didn’t support drag&drop.

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Look at this video from 4 years ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGHokrbjlz8

          I updated even on the beta version and at the beginning I was like “well it’s a beta, surely they will fix it”… Then it launched with the broken taskbar and I thought “surely this will be patched in a week” - it took TWO YEARS

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      And it kind of makes sense to have the taskbar at the right or left on a widescreen monitor as there is so much space there

      • ravelin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Actually my understanding is that in Japan and other cultures, right hand side start menu has been the standard preference. It’s amazing to me that that cultural preference even has been ignored.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      In every version of Windows up until now which has contained a taskbar and start menu, as far back as Windows 95. Not just Windows 10.

      Sadly not true. Microsoft removed the Start button in a version of Windows before. It was in Windows 8 (and Windows Server 2012 for some godforsaken reason) with the cursed “metro” interface. MS did it for the same stupid reason they’re citing here “tablet and touchscreen users”. The uproar caused MS to release Windows 8.1 a year later where they returned the Start button.

      • hikaru755@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sadly not true. Microsoft removed the Start button in a version of Windows before

        They didn’t say that every version of windows since then had a start button

        First of all they only talked about the start menu, which was still part of 8, even if it was annoying and full-screen. And second they only said that every Windows version that had that allowed you to move the taskbar around. Not that every Windows version so far had it.

    • Janx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      The years of engineering salaries and test versions to dock a visual element at the top, instead of the bottom…

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    5 days ago

    “When you think about having the taskbar on the right or the left, all of a sudden the reflow and the work that all of the apps have to do to be able to have a wonderful experience in those environments is just huge.”

    This is such utter fucking nonsense. They already have to deal with the concept of a “client area” that encompasses variable-sized screens and (worse) the multiple-monitor situation. Movable task bar is trivial.

  • oh_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s quite an article to say they forgot about it after re-writing the task bar for no reason. It’s such a basic expected feature.

    • kalpol@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Linux is missing enterprise management tools. For all its horrible flaws, nothing like SCCM, In tune, group policy, and Active Directory (in the sense of managing group policy, not so much identity) exist for Linux. Fix that, even commercially, and you might see a real change.

      • oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        No thanks! I’m more into abolishing capitalism than facitating it further. I’m looking forward to the end of all commercial enterprises and especially management! It should be as difficult and expensive as possible to establish hierarchical systems of digitally managing large corporations.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    6 days ago

    Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

    WHAT DATA?!

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        If they were using that data, then they would have included features people actually use in 10. Or maybe they’re just doing the inverse of whatever the data suggests.

        • hikaru755@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Or maybe you’re overestimating the amount of people who actually used that. Spending effort on something that less than maybe 1% of users actually use and that is not load bearing to any important workflows is hard to argue for when you’re a corp that is only concerned about its own bottom line. It’s a pretty rational business decision, even if you (and I) disagree with it.

        • pemptago@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s the data of what corners MS can cut to save more money than they lose when x number of users decide enough is enough.

    • Madrigal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Two data points: What their intern could do with React; what their intern couldn’t do with React.

    • imecth@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s Microsoft, they have all the data. And quite frankly it doesn’t surprise even a little bit, i doubt even 5% of people moved around the taskbar, people are just ready to hitch themselves to every bandwagon they see shitting on Microsoft.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        In that case, based on the roughly 1.5 billion Windows users, that’ll only affect a mere 75 million users for a feature that’s been there since Windows 95.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 days ago

          The equation they are thinking of, though, is “will the cost of those who actually quit using Windows outweigh the cost of building and maintaining this feature.” Funnily enough the inability to move the taskbar is what finally pushed me to Linux full-time, but the overwhelming majority will complain and stick to Windows.

    • BigMilk13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Plasma is everything I used to wish Windows’ desktop could be, but isn’t because of… honestly I have no idea what they’re thinking over there. I am so glad I dumped that trainwreck. Love everything KDE <3

  • krakenx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    "Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

    Unfortunately, for the enthusiasts who had a left-aligned or vertical taskbar in Windows 10, you would have to settle for the fact that Microsoft’s data shows such users are really small when compared to the number of users who are asking for other newer features in the taskbar."

    100% of the users that are smart enough to care about moving the task bar are also smart enough to turn off all optional telemetry. This sadly a part of why tech companies are making products for the dumbest people and pushing away power users.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I just find it hilarious that the top/right/left toolbar was possible in windows 95/98/ME

      but its to much of a technical problem to do today.

      I guess thats what you get with AI doing all your coding…

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    The amount of bullshit is incredible. The DE sets the windows position. The DE tells the apps what’s the “usable” desktop area. It worked for decades. And now “you can’t imagine the amount of work”

    Fuck you microsoft. Not that I care anymore. Even your excuses are pathetic.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      There was a while back some Windows developer externally lamenting how ass-backwards they were and as a result their NT kernel was woefully under-featured compared to other contemporary OSes…

      Then I think they forced him to take it back and say ‘um actually our kernel is actually super awesome, my mistake’.

  • B-TR3E@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    6 days ago

    building the taskbar from scratch meant that they had to cherry-pick things to put into the feature list first, and the ability to move the taskbar didn’t make the cut, for several reasons that Microsoft values.

    Translation: Nobody really knows (or wants to take the blame), we probably just forgot to put on the feature list. Anyway, I’ll just use the usual vague weasel-words that don’t really mean anything.

    • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 days ago

      "Window’s is built on many layers of shit and we dont know what will or won’t break things.

      Also co pilot was really expensive"

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    So, to cater to the maximum number of users at once, Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

    I call bullshit, because nobody uses the “modern” devices and printers interface in windows 10, because it fucking sucks. Everyone goes to the control panel instead. In windows 11, you have to use the “modern” interface, and it drives me crazy, especially because the old, fully functional, and reliable one is still in the OS, but Microsoft decided to hide it/make it a PITA to get to.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      They keep re-implementing things.

      Just the Start menu. You can see how 95 evolved into 98 evolved into ME, then they changed it for XP, and they never stopped making big pointless changes. In many cases, those big pointless changes have been lengthening the process of going from the bare desktop to the thing you need by adding pointless screens and dialogs. Or, like the Start menu, they just drastically redesigned it such that a user used to Win XP tries to use 7 and they just…stare at it because it’s not what they were expecting. Windows 7’s Start menu might even be objectively better, Microsoft’s software engineers could very well produce good research documentation about UI design based on observing or polling users about what features they wanted and then they made the thing people seemed to want, but to people who got used to how it already worked the new thing was bad because it’s different.

      I could be convinced Windows 8.1 is a mental unwellness simulator. In Sierra’s FMV horror game Phantasmagoria 2, the player character goes insane at work, and this is simulated by the paperwork he’s working on flashing scarier words for a split second. You’re reading this document and then near the bottom of the page an ordinary word like “recommended” turns to “murdered” for a few frames. Win 8.1’s animated tiles reminded me of that. Plus the whole “The desktop and all normal Windows apps therein is itself just an app that can be run in split screen next to special phone-like single tasking apps which pretty much only we will develop for and we won’t include desktop versions of so you have to deal with this.” I hate Windows 8.1.

      What’s real fun is you can tell when they abandoned work on a project by which drastically different UI it’s encrusted with. The modem dialer looks like Windows XP, the fax program looks like Vista, some things have the flat purple stank of 8, some things have the dark glass look of early 10.

      • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Over the years I came to realize that tech savvy when it came to windows doesn’t actually mean anything. It just means you are able to fight through the bullshit and get things done with what you have.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      For printers, go to DEVICES > let it load it all > more devices settings (towards bottom) - to open old school printer control panel. Major pain in the ass.

  • Stormcrow@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Simple regedit used to fix this, but then stuff started to not work quite right as it got updated, and now I don’t think that regedit works anymore.