• socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Look man, making missile killing lasers is just way more interesting than building another pointless SUV to a price target.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    My university is practically owned by weapons manufacturers which sucks. Idk if that’s the norm or not

      • I’m from mainland China (currently residing in the US), profile pic is because I hate the 5-Star Red Flag and the politics it represents.

        Probably something with Asian cultures’s obsession with the idea of “success”. Like… my parents literally wouldn’t care if I became some corrupt government official as long as I don’t get caught. Success is worshipped, failure is shamed. I talk shit about trump, and like my mom said “at least he became president, can you do that?”

        I’m like: “naturalized citizens can’t be president”

        omg immediately less than 1 second later, mom goes: “but Gary Locke became Governor” (Gary Locke is a Chinese American)

        And like you know Mamdani won, immedialy after, she told me “an immigrant managed to become Mayor, you are an immigrant just like him, why can’t you do the same?” bruh… maybe I could if I didn’t get so much emotional damage, mom.

        Like they worship success, regardless of if they are “good” or “bad” people.

        If you try to be a good person and you “fail” in life, you are considered worse than the bad person in power making a lot of money.

        I’m like just so close to killing myself, even though I really wanna live, this is too painful, depression is too painful.

        My parents are slowly killing my ethics and empathy, like one day I might just not care.

        Either you die young with your morals intact, or you seek success and survival, and you corrupt your soul…

        This world is cruel. The world wants you to be cruel to be able to even live a comfortable life.

  • Darkness343@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    Tools don’t kill. It’s the ones wielding the tools that do.

    A black home bomb is harmless until someone uses it to wipe out an entire solar system.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To quote Casually Explained:

    "The only real question engineering students and new grads need to know the answer to is ‘When is it ok to violate your moral principles?’

    Exactly. It has to be at least 6 figures."

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is why I focused on graphics hardware for so long… Then some arsehole came up with running AI on GPUs.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      series of increasingly large dominoes where the smallest is “NVIDIA releases CUDA” and the largest is “the entire global economy has become dependent on running a useless computer program that tricks stupid people into believing it can do anything worthwhile”

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ll be honest, I’d rather the best engineers be there to create weapons that are extremely precise. The weapons are gonna be made regardless, but I’ve seen photos of what happens to cities when bombers are dropping unguided munitions. Back during WW2, if you wanted to hit a factory in London, you didn’t just drop 1-2 bombs, you dropped hundreds of bombs, you flattened absolutely everything in the area because that was the only way you were gonna hit your target.

    At least with precision munitions, if you’re doing war ‘nicely’, you only hit what you intend to hit, not your target + everything else even remotely close to said target. With precision munitions, you can’t ‘accidentally’ bomb a hospital, so when you inevitably do bomb a hospital, you don’t get to go “Oh oops no it’s not my fault it’s the bombs’ fault!”. The sights are crystal clear, the plane/drone moves exactly where you want it to, there’s nothing interfering with the guidance, the bomb locked onto the target you wanted to hit, and you dropped it, all thanks to engineers making those systems. You had everything going for you as a bomber to know exactly what that target was, and you dropped the bomb anyway.

  • ExLisperA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Here’s a great idea: let’s not produce any weapons and disarm unilaterally. What could go wrong?

      • ExLisperA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The good guys. Define them as you like.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      How about we split the difference and only cut two thirds of all military spending? We would still be pouring more money into it than any country on earth.

      • ExLisperA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There will still be people working for arms companies. All of them will deserve hell?

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If we cut back that much, then we wouldn’t be able to fuel nearly as much death and destruction around the globe. But, not to worry, I’m sure we could still find enough evil to do to both satisfy your desire for blood and to earn the people responsible a cozy little spot in Hell, yes.

          • ExLisperA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Where did you get my desire for blood from? All I’m saying is that the same arms companies make weapons that fall in Gaza and that protect Europe. You can’t have one but not the other. It’s up to politicians to decide how to use those weapons, not engineers.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              It’s up to politicians to decide how to use those weapons, not engineers.

              Exactly how far does this extend? Because a lot of people involved in supporting the Nazi war effort said the exact same thing.

              If you go around solving every problem you’re asked to with no concern for who’s asking or why, that’s how you wind up developing Zyklon B.

              Giving a gun to a murderer is the same as pulling the trigger. Giving artillery to a murderer is too.

              • ExLisperA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Great, so let’s disarm unilaterally. I’m sure Russia and China will do the same.

                Such a childish take…

  • Sculptus Poe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I offered to leave my senior design group and find another when they were going to build a system for the military as their project. They were nice enough to change it to an automated feeder.